|
|
 |
RECOMMENDATION 1348 (1997)[1]
on the
temporary protection of persons forced to flee their country
-
In Europe a number of people forced to flee countries beset by
war, civil strife, widespread violence or natural disasters may not necessarily be covered
by the refugee definition of the 1951 Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees
and its 1967 Protocol, nor by their application. Likewise, in the event of a massive
influx, it is virtually impossible to process asylum applications individually.
-
The swift and flexible award of temporary protection to whole
categories of people in danger is therefore an essential instrument which complements, but
cannot substitute for, the protection system established by the Geneva Convention.
-
To gear the use of this instrument as closely as possible both to
the beneficiaries' needs and to the host states' resources, it is imperative to establish
a common reference framework which will serve as a basis for European states' legislation
and practice. At present, besides general provisions of international human rights and
refugee law, there are no specific international legal obligations concerning the granting
of temporary protection and the scope of the rights it entails.
-
Temporary protection is by definition limited in time. It is
based on the presumption of return, which must take place as soon as the conditions
justifying temporary protection cease to exist. Compliance with this principle is
essential if the concept is to remain credible in the eyes of the member states and to be
used in the future.
-
The Assembly stresses that return must be safe, dignified,
orderly and staggered and must take into account the country of origin's capacity to
absorb the returnees.
-
If temporary protection is to function effectively, the process
must be closely co-ordinated from beginning to end between all the states and
international organisations concerned so as to avoid disproportionate distribution of
people fleeing their country as well as secondary movements of refugees between European
states in the event that temporary protection is lifted unilaterally.
-
Temporary protection must be viewed in the broader context of a
comprehensive effort to re-establish peace and prosperity in the country of origin. While
a successful return is critical for reconstruction, hasty repatriation may be a further
barrier to stabilising the country.
-
At present, the debate on temporary protection in Europe is
closely linked to the situation of persons who have fled the conflict in some countries of
the former Yugoslavia, in particular Bosnia and Herzegovina.
-
The Assembly therefore recommends that the Committee of
Ministers:
-
adopt a recommendation to member states establishing common
guiding principles for member states' legislation and practice with regard to temporary
protection, drawing upon the proposals contained in paragraph 9.iv below, as well as upon
the principles formulated by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees (UNHCR);
-
provide in such a recommendation for the introduction of a
system for swift consultation and co-ordination between the member states, in co-operation
with UNHCR, if there is a risk of a massive influx of people seeking international
protection, especially on such points as the admission of these people to the states'
territory, their equitable distribution and the lifting of protection;
-
invite the European Union to use the framework of the Council
of Europe in co-operation with UNHCR to co-ordinate its temporary protection initiatives
on a pan-European scale and, when framing its standards in this area, to draw upon the
principles set out in paragraph 9.iv below;
-
ask the member states to:
-
adopt a generous attitude towards people in need of international
protection, allow them to be speedily and flexibly admitted to their territory and, in
particular, exempt them from visa requirements;
-
co-ordinate their temporary protection policies at European level
and support the establishment of a rapid consultation and co-ordination system as proposed
in paragraph 9.ii above;
-
strictly respect the principle of
non-refoulement;
-
ensure respect for the human rights of people under temporary
protection and, where their stay is prolonged, upgrade their economic and social rights,
including access to employment;
-
ensure that people under temporary protection have access to
primary and secondary education and make every effort to improve their access to higher
education;
-
organise vocational training schemes for people under temporary
protection to help them reintegrate after their return and in the event of resettlement;
-
from the very outset of temporary protection, facilitate family
reunification for certain vulnerable groups, especially unaccompanied under-age children
and, where the stay is substantially prolonged, allow family reunification for spouses,
under-age children and other, dependent ascendants of people under temporary protection;
-
examine asylum applications by people under temporary protection
as soon as possible and, in any case, two years after the beginning of temporary
protection at the latest;
-
refrain from returning persons whose applications for asylum have
been rejected as long as the conditions justifying temporary protection persist;
-
where the conditions justifying temporary protection persist for
an extended period, and in any case after two years, grant all beneficiaries stable legal
status entitling them to the same economic and social rights as other residents;
-
once temporary protection has been lifted, favour the principle
of voluntary return and refrain from forcibly repatriating certain categories of people,
especially those who might have reason to fear persecution, victims of torture, traumas
due to war and rape and sick people who cannot receive medical care in their countries of
origin;
-
implement these recommendations as soon as possible and apply
them to both future situations and to persons already under temporary protection.
[1] Text adopted by the Standing Committee, acting on
behalf of the Assembly, on 7 November 1997.
See Doc. 7889, report of the Committee on Migration, Refugees and
Demography, rapporteur: Mrs Arnold.
|
 |