RECOMMENDATION 509 (1968)[1]
on human rights and modern
scientific and technological
developments
The Assembly,
1. Considering that member States under
the Statute of the Council of Europe accept the principle of
the enjoyment by all persons within their jurisdiction of
human rights and fundamental freedoms;
2. Having regard to the serious dangers for the rights of the
individual inherent in certain aspects of modern scientific
and technological development;
3. Believing that newly developed techniques such as phone-tapping, eavesdropping, surreptitious
observation, the illegitimate use of official statistical and
similar surveys to obtain private information, and subliminal
advertising and propaganda are a threat to the rights and
freedoms of individuals and, in particular, to the right to
privacy which is protected by Article 8 of the European
Convention on Human Rights;
4. Considering that the law in the
majority of the member States does not provide adequate protection against such threats to the right
of privacy, and that there is in consequence danger of
violation of Article 8 of the Convention on Human Rights;
5. Noting that some member States of
the Council of Europe are planning to revise their
legislation on this subject and that it would be desirable for
any such reform to tend towards a greater harmonisation of the
law ;
6. Considering that it would be useful
to make a detailed study of the legal problems arising in
connection with the right to privacy and its violation by
modern technical devices, with special reference to the
European Convention on Human Rights;
7. Reserving the right to continue its own studies
and to make further proposals on the questions concerned,
8. Recommends that the Committee of Ministers
instruct the Committee of Experts on Human Rights :
(i) to study and report on the question whether, having
regard to Article 8 of the Convention on Human Rights, the
national legislation in the member States adequately protects
the right to privacy against violations which may be committed
by the use of modern scientific and technical methods;
(ii) if the answer to this question is in the negative, to
make recommendations for the better protection of the right of
privacy.
[1]. Assembly Debate on 31st January 1968 (16th
Sitting) (see Doc. 2326, report of the Legal
Committee).
Text adopted by the Assembly on 31st
January 1968 (16th Sitting).
|