Recommendation 1372 (1998)1
Unidroit Convention on stolen or illegally exported
cultural property
1. The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe regards the
1995 Unidroit Convention on stolen or illegally exported cultural property as an important
contribution to the preservation of the cultural heritage of mankind and fully endorses
it. It calls upon the members of the Assembly to work towards ratification of the
convention in their own parliaments.
2. The Council of Europe has itself addressed the question of the
illicit movement of cultural property, notably in the Assemblys Recommendation 1072
(1989) on the international protection of cultural property and the circulation of works
of art and in the European Convention on Offences relating to Cultural Property (Delphi,
1985).
3. The Unidroit Convention aims to provide a substantial benefit for
owners whose property is stolen in having the market tightened to try to avoid the present
easy passage of stolen goods into the licit market. A significant advance is in the
potentially worldwide scope of the convention and the restrictions this should place upon
the pillage of cultural property from developing countries or areas of conflict.
4. The Unidroit Convention can, however, only develop its full
effect when the same number of states producing cultural property accede to it as states
importing cultural property.
5. The Unidroit Convention cannot solve all the problems which the
transfer of cultural objects poses. Because the convention does not apply to cultural
objects taken before its entry into force, it will not provide remedies, for example, for
the theft of cultural objects in the former Yugoslavia or Jewish cultural objects
transported from the Baltic states into many countries as a result of the second world
war, or for the national treasure which the Romanian Government sent abroad for
safekeeping during the first world war and which was never returned. However, other
remedies are already available under the Protocol to the 1954 Convention, the Unesco
Convention on illicit traffic of 1970 and by application to the Unesco Intergovernmental
Committee for Promoting the Return of Cultural Property to its Countries of Origin or its
Restitution in Case of Illicit Appropriation.
6. The Unidroit Convention does not deal with criminal law. But
while it will not of itself completely solve the problem of international crime rings
dealing in cultural property, the effect of the convention should diminish the
profitability, and increase the risks, of criminal activity.
7. Further international efforts are necessary to go beyond the
convention in protecting while respecting countries right to their own
heritage the cultural heritage of humanity and allowing as wide public access to it
as possible.
8. The Assembly recommends that the Committee of Ministers:
i. call on all member, Observer and Special Guest states to become
parties to the convention and incorporate it into their national law;
ii. create, through the Council of Europe and the European Union,
the material means by which experts of the Unidroit Institute could assist those states
seeking advice on incorporating the convention into national law;
iii. promote an exchange of good practice in the application of the
Unidroit Convention, especially in the field of customs and police activities;
iv. call on the North-South Centre in Lisbon to encourage
non-European countries to ratify the convention and implement it with the help of Unesco
and the Unidroit Institute, and extend, if necessary, the mandate of the North-South
Centre to this effect;
v. invite the states which have signed the convention to deposit the
text of the law which incorporates the convention into their national legislation, in an
official language of the convention, at the Unidroit Institute;
vi. contribute to ensuring that, in addition to the known
international courts of arbitration, the states establish an arbitration commission at the
Unidroit Institute that can be called upon by the States Parties to assist in the event of
disagreements concerning the interpretation of the text of the convention;
vii. promote the results of the conference organised by the Paul
Getty Institute in Amsterdam in May 1997 on the identification, origin, legal acquisition,
transport and ownership of cultural property and to solve other outstanding problems as
soon as possible;
viii. ask member governments to take steps to ensure that special
attention is devoted to combating international crime rings in the area of cultural
property, ensure that there are sufficient police officers specialised in criminality
concerning art objects and step up international police co-operation in this field.
__________
1. Text adopted by the Standing Committee, acting on
behalf of the Assembly, on 26 May 1998.
See Doc. 8001, report of the Committee on Culture and Education,
rapporteur: Mrs Terborg; and Doc. 8095, opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs and
Human Rights, rapporteurs: MM. Kostytsky and Schwimmer.
|