1. Introduction
1. For ten years, the Committee
on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men has sought to promote parity democracy
and to combat violence against women. Particular emphasis has been
placed on combating the discrimination suffered by women (in the
job market, and in economic and political decision-making posts)
and the inequalities between women and men which are firmly rooted
in society and which, in some cases, can result in violence against
women, in both the public and private spheres.
2. The enactment of new and effective legislation in the field
of gender equality has fallen short of what is required because
European societies, still heavily patriarchal, put up considerable
resistance. New avenues must be explored to take equal opportunities
further and to ensure that in the Council of Europe member states, both
men and women can benefit from a more egalitarian society. While
it must be stressed that the contribution of women’s organisations
has been crucial in advancing the cause of equality between women
and men in Europe, it has to be acknowledged today that if there
are to be real changes in attitudes and behaviour in terms of gender
equality, then men have to become more involved.
3. For example, although the situation of women has improved
considerably since the time when the Council of Europe was founded,
it is still unsatisfactory. Too few women are in positions of responsibility.
In 2008, women account for just 27% of PACE members, 23% of national
members of parliament and 33% of economic decision-making posts
in the European Union. This inequality persists even though it is
now a known fact that women are in the majority in secondary and
post-secondary education and, more particularly, that more women
than men successfully complete higher education courses
. Although the situation has changed in
the past few years, it is nevertheless too early to measure the
impact.
4. Internationally, since the 4th World
Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995, the concept of promoting equality
has been more closely defined: whereas the emphasis previously was
on promoting women, it is now placed on gender equality. It highlights
the need to include men in the framing of equality policies. This dimension
was also recognised in the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers’
recent Recommendation Rec (2007)17, which states that “Because gender
equality is a concern of all members of a society, the full involvement
of boys and men is decisive and instrumental to achieve that aim,
which will have a positive impact on and bring added value to the
lives of both girls and boys, women and men”.
5. The implementation of innovative policies in Council of Europe
member states today opens up new prospects. The so-called “male”
professions are slowly becoming accessible to women – while few
men accept to work in so-called “female” professions. Over the last
30 years there has been a gradual, albeit still insufficient, improvement
of the participation of women in national parliaments. In order
to reach the critical mass of 40%
of
women in elected assemblies and thereby maximise the development
potential of society as a whole and individuals, it is essential
for men to be fully involved in gender equality policies and themselves benefit
from the new relationship between women and men.
6. In general, men have more to gain from a more equal society.
In effect, gender equality is not a zero sum game. Reinforcing the
role of women does not weaken the position of men – on the contrary.
According to a recent study published in Sweden based on the relationship
between paternity leave in 1978-1979 and male mortality in 1981–2001,
Swedish men who take parental leave benefit from a significant reduction
in their mortality risk (16%).
This figure might be surprising,
but a possible explanation could be that parental leave can mean
reduced professional stress and healthier lifestyle and attitude.
7. The Committee on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men was
asked by the Bureau of the Assembly to draft a report on “involving
men in achieving gender equality”, following the motion tabled by
José Mendes Bota (Portugal, EPP/CD) and others, which was a follow-up
to Motion 10604, “Men’s involvement in equality projects” tabled
in 2005 by Jean-Guy Branger (France, EPP/CD) and others. By appointing
a man as its chair in January 2008, ten years after it was set up,
and by instructing me to draft the report, the Committee on Equal Opportunities
also wished to send a strong political signal and encourage PACE
male parliamentarians to promote gender equality policies in Europe.
I would like to thank the members of the committee who, at its meetings
on 6 June and 12 September 2008, made valuable contributions to
the debate.
2. Involving men: lessons learnt
from the parliamentary dimension of the Council of Europe campaign to
combat violence against women, including domestic violence
8. If we are to achieve gender
equality, the role of men is crucial. The path to equality requires
a gender perspective to be a part of all fields of action – ie not
only a gender mainstreaming approach, but also specific action to
make men realise that a continuation of gender inequality is harmful
for the human and economic development of society.
9. I would like to illustrate this aspect of the problem by the
lessons we have learned from the parliamentary dimension of the
Council of Europe campaign to combat violence against women, including
domestic violence (2006-2008)
.
Violence against women by men is one of the most widespread and
frequent violations of human rights in our societies. Even though
a minority of victims of domestic violence are men, violence against
women is often the ultimate expression of a patriarchal society
which makes women subordinate to men.
10. The Council of Europe campaign has helped to break the silence
on the extent of the problem which affects all member states and
all social classes. According to available figures, it is estimated
that one out of four women has been a victim of physical violence
or threats in her life. These figures differ significantly from one
country to another. In certain countries, there seems to have been
a positive development
. During the campaign,
the Parliamentary Assembly stressed the need for parliaments to
adopt or monitor the application of seven key priority measures
.
The campaign showed that it is vital to change mentalities and involve
men as a
crucial factor for change in
order to combat violence against women, in the words
of the declaration adopted by the Standing Committee in Bratislava
on 25 November 2007.
- Changing
the attitudes and behaviour of violent men often entails specific
treatment for the perpetrators of violence. Several countries have
set up special programmes (eg Reform
centres for Men in Norway which
run anger management seminars, and the Mentors
in Violence programme in the United States designed for
US Navy personnel). Violence may often be accentuated not only by
marginalisation phenomena such as alcohol problems or personal failure
but also by traditions and customs which may glorify a patriarchal
conception of masculinity.
- In order to encourage the involvement of male parliamentarians
in this campaign, the Assembly recommended setting up networks of
male MPs active in combating violence against women. This initiative
was inspired by the network of Swedish parliamentarians set up by
Lars U Granberg and his colleagues, the oldest network of male MPs
dedicated to combating violence against women. It was set up in
2004, following a seminar organised by the Nordic Council on trafficking
in human beings for sexual exploitation. The initial objective was
to encourage men to learn more about this issue. The network’s focus
was quickly extended to cover action to combat violence against
women and the fight for equal opportunities in working life. Accordingly,
the Council of Europe encouraged the setting up of networks of parliamentarians
along the Swedish model in four parliaments (Albania, Andorra, Croatia
and Moldova). Initiatives have been taken in Portugal and the United
Kingdom. Mention should also be made of other networks of men combating
violence against women: on 23 April 2008, the president of the Basque
Autonomous Community Juan José Ibarretxe and a group of 27 Basque
men from the world of culture and sport signed a charter on equality
and against sexist violence . These initiatives owe much to the
action of NGOs such as Men in Schools,
the Male Forum, Masculinity and paternity and the White Ribbon campaign to encourage
men to take action to combat violence .
11. It should be noted that several countries (eg Denmark, Norway
and Sweden
)
have sought to incorporate this mobilisation of men against domestic
violence within their development policy.
12. Lastly, the Council of Europe has taken some welcome initiatives
to promote men’s involvement, both during the campaign “Stop domestic
violence against women”
and
in the activities of the Directorate General of Human Rights and
Legal Affairs.
3. Reconciling private and
family life: a challenge for women and men
13. Societies which have introduced
an active gender equality policy have the highest GNP per capita,
the highest life expectancy at birth and the highest level of education.
This is what is measured by the Human Development Index, devised
by the UNDP in 1990. Iceland, Norway, Australia, Canada, Ireland
and Sweden topped the list in 2005. These countries all have particularly
high employment rates for both women and men
.
14. Female employment has been the main factor in the steady growth
of employment in the EU in recent years. Between 2000 and 2006 employment
in EU-27 grew by nearly 12 million, including more than 7.5 million women
. As such, it appears
among the Lisbon objectives, Growth and jobs, and in the United
Nations Millennium Goals (Goal 3 – Promoting gender equality and
empowering women). This leads me to the conclusion that the way
to make our societies prosper is to improve child-care provision,
put into place parental leave attractive to both women and men,
and put into place other measures to reconcile work and family life.
15. Thanks to the potential of the new information and communication
technologies (ICTs), the implementation of flexicurity (flexibility
of the labour market combined with job security) concerns women
first and foremost. The availability of teleworking opportunities,
child-care provision and domestic services helps establish a more
equal balance between male and female career paths within the couple.
However, despite significant changes, working women continue to
spend more time than men on unpaid domestic chores
and a higher proportion of women work
part-time – often not their preferred choice – since for many women
this is the only way they can manage to combine working life and
family life, given, among other things and not least, the lack of
child-care facilities.
16. The FOCUS project (Fostering Caring Masculinities)
funded
by Daphné in 2006 compared the legal framework in 5 European countries
and assessed the prospects for re-establishing a balance between
men and women in reconciling work and family life
.
17. Parental leave as it exists in Iceland is one example of best
practice. This system divides parental leave into three non-transferable
phases, 3 months to be used exclusively by the mother, 3 months
exclusively by the father and the remaining 3 months by either one
of the two parents. Parental leave is paid on the basis of 80% of
the average wage earned during the 24 previous months, and is financed
by a special fund. During the hearing of 13 September 2005 organised
by the Parliamentary Assembly’s Committee on Equal Opportunities for
Women and Men in Reykjavik, minister Árni Magnússon said that this
new system was
one of the best investments
for the future both from a social and an economic point of view,
as well as being a very important scheme that encouraged men’s involvement
in equality projects . Some
countries have run information campaigns to familiarise fathers
with their parental leave rights (eg Belgium
and
Denmark, where the Danish equality ministry issued a brochure “Take
your leave!”
). However, awareness-raising campaigns
– even the most successful ones – cannot correct deeply-ingrained
structural weaknesses of a system.
18. The
European Fatherhood site
is a source of interesting information on men’s involvement in parenthood
. Several countries have organised
special programmes for future fathers during pregnancy; health-care
staff attending the mother are made fully aware of the role the
father will be required to play
.
19. As highlighted in the report by Ms Papadopoulos (Cyprus, ALDE)
, states have a vital role to play
in putting in place reconciliation measures incorporating the gender
dimension, enabling men and women to have access to arrangements
which are both effective and attractive. The introduction of paid
parental leave for both men and women, part of which must be used
exclusively by men, is an excellent example of the type of incentives
which could help change mentalities. The Nordic countries have shown
the way in this field, in particular Sweden and Iceland
. Because this parental
leave is paid leave and part of it is non-transferable to the mother,
it constitutes a major step forward in gender equality
. Ingolfúr V. Gislason of the Gender
Equality Centre in Iceland believes that employers are more positive
about paternity leave when it is forced upon them by law than when
it is voluntary
.
4. Making boys equality-conscious:
achieving gender equality from an early age
20. Involving men also entails
raising boys’ awareness from an early age through a new and non-stereotyped
distribution of roles to girls and boys, and by bringing boys and
girls up in an equality-based approach. This is a key challenge
which will impact on future relationships between men and women.
At school, it is essential to provide children with an open education
which integrates the gender perspective and offers equal opportunities
to both girls and boys. The Canadian authorities have been at the
forefront of this, publishing several textbooks aimed at boys.
21. Here, I would like to focus particular attention on the image
of women conveyed in the media. All too often, as condemned by the
Parliamentary Assembly
,
the image of women in advertising and in the media is based on stereotypes
perpetuating inequalities between women and men, or even trivialising
violence against women and violations of their dignity. Subsequently
in adolescence, young people’s discovery of sexuality is heavily
influenced by pornography.
22. Clearly, parents have a responsibility to be attentive to
such developments among their children, but the public authorities
must also regulate and combat such images, in particular through
specific action targeting men so that they question the negative
side of masculinity and the attitudes and behaviour which fail to
respect the human rights of women and girls.
23. Boys and men need to be involved in other areas too. In the
field of reproductive health, the United Nations Population Fund
(UNFPA) has undertaken very specific action in Turkey with the first
division football federation
,
the textile federation, the police training colleges, imams and
the newspaper Hürriyet’s campaign to combat violence against women.
24. Numerous sectoral programmes are also specifically aimed at
involving men (such as in the field of health, reproductive health,
fatherhood, etc). A study by the World Health Organisation assessed
58 programmes designed to encourage greater involvement amongst
men. It showed that such action is particularly effective when it
covers several themes and includes specific discussions on social
perceptions of men and masculinity. It was not enough to involve
men in sectoral projects, it was also essential to initiate substantive
debate on issues of (in)equality between women and men in order
to change mentalities and attitudes
.
5. Sharing political and economic
power
25. Involving men in equality policies
should enable women to participate fully in society and to reach
the objective of the Committee of Ministers Recommendation Rec(2003)3
on balanced participation by women and men in political and public
decision making, which sets out that “the representation of either
women or men in any decision-making body in political or public
life should not fall below 40%”.
26. Above and beyond parliamentary parity, sharing political power
not only means a balanced distribution of experts on consultative
committees, but also the provision of budgetary resources via
gender budgeting. These principles
should also apply to the Council of Europe, as requested by the
Parliamentary Assembly in its
Recommendation
1738 (2006)Mechanisms to ensure women’s
participation in decision-making (Rapporteur: Ms Cliveti,
Romania, SOC) and
Recommendation 1739 (2006) on
Gender budgeting (Rapporteur:
Ms Curdová, Czech Republic, SOC).
27. Out of the 20 countries that have broken through the critical
threshold of 30% of women in their parliament, 10 are Council of
Europe member states
. Spain and Finland are the only
countries with a government having more women than men.
28. Although women’s participation in economic life has increased
significantly, their representation in key posts of power and influence
falls well below that of men
.
29. The Norwegian law on gender quotas for boards of directors
of listed companies is ground-breaking in terms of improving the
representation of women in the decision-making bodies. The law has
been in force since 1st January 2006. It provides that on 1st January
2008 any company which does not have at least a 40% gender quota
may be delisted from the Oslo stock exchange
.
In 2006, Norway already had a much higher feminisation rate than
other European countries, standing at almost 28%.
30. However, despite the adoption of legislative measures to bring
about greater involvement of men, male employees are reluctant to
avail themselves of these facilities. This may be explained by the
culture of presenteeism, the risks this may represent for career
advancement, and the stereotypes that persist both in society (the
man as breadwinner versus the woman as home-maker) and in the work
environment. This is also reflected in advertising
and in the incomprehension
or hostility met with from employers, work colleagues or other family
members
.
31. Companies can also exert a positive influence to help reconcile
working and family life and promote positive parenting among their
male employees. There are specific guides in this field, in particular
the Decalogue for Companies and Organisations, drawn up under the
European “All together” project
,
and the “Handbook for Companies to promote positive parenting among
male employees: a work equality issue”
. The aim is to help companies
identify the cultural and structural barriers to genuine equality
at work, put forward proposals for consulting the social partners,
trade unions and staff on this issue, manage working hours and organisation,
propose facilities for parents, draw up action plans and assess
the arrangements in place.
32. It is essential to improve women’s labour market participation
in order to tackle unequal pay between women and men
. According to the European Commission’s
figures (2005), women in the European Union earn an average of 15%
less than their male counterparts
.
Here again, it is crucial to involve men in the issue of women’s
position in the world of work, in order to change attitudes, further
equality between women and men and thus take active steps against
unequal pay, which is unacceptable.
33. Men must be involved in a comprehensive discussion of the
traditional roles assigned to women and men and of ways to combat
stereotypes and promote equality in the private, public and economic
spheres. A noteworthy experiment has been conducted in Norway, where
the Minister for Children and Equality Karita Bekkemellem set up
a “men’s panel” in 2007, comprising 32 men from political, artistic
and sports circles and other personalities from the private and
public sectors and grassroots associations
to
discuss men’s rights (particularly in the areas of divorce, childcare
and health). As part of the government’s preparation of a White Paper
on “The role of men in society”, the panel drew up a memorandum
in March 2008
and
put forward a series of recommendations on education, violence,
health care and the integration of migrants. Parliament will discuss
the White
6. Conclusions
34. The Parliamentary Assembly
believes that men’s involvement is an essential precondition for
achieving gender equality. Accordingly, PACE should take the view
that public policies should incorporate not only a gender perspective
but also measures to combat stereotypes and encourage men’s involvement.
Its stance should be that men too can benefit from a fairer distribution
of the roles between women and men and from a more egalitarian society.
35. The Assembly should urgently call on the governments of member
states to:
- initiate educational
programmes to encourage boys and men to play a part in equality
projects and to put forward proposals for specific action to raise
their awareness of the importance of gender equality;
- promote the involvement of men, at the earliest possible
age, in combating violence against women and girls;
- educate men and offer a framework to encourage them to
take an active part in tasks traditionally assigned to women (childcare,
management of social and educational matters);
- take an active part in stopping the perpetuation of stereotypes
confining men and women to traditional roles, particularly in advertising;
- promote positive measures to improve women’s and men’s
participation in public and political life (in line with Resolution 1489 (2006) on Mechanisms to ensure women’s
participation in decision-making);
- promote the position of women on the labour market and
their access to the decision-making posts, and thus help to tackle
unequal pay;
- introduce special programmes to promote parenthood and
ways of reconciling work and private life among male employees in
the civil service and encourage enterprises in the private sector
to propose similar programmes, in line with Recommendation 1769 (2006) on The need to reconcile
work and family life;
- fully incorporate men’s involvement in sectoral policies
relating to reproductive health, the organisation of working time
and family policies, while at the same time explicitly addressing
the question of gender equality;
- change legislation, if this has not already been done,
to introduce paid parental leave including a part that is non-transferable
to the mother, which encourages men to take it and to play an active
part in the care of young children;;
- introduce the gender perspective into budgets, which is
a key means of analysing the impact of public policies on citizens,
both female and male, and to restructure revenue and spending so
as to reduce socio-economic inequalities between men and women.
36. It should also encourage national parliaments to set up networks
of male parliamentarians committed to combating violence against
women and to working to achieve gender equality. The Assembly should encourage
an exchange of best practices between these groups and draw up guidelines
to promote men’s involvement and achieve gender equality.
Reporting committee:
Committee on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men.
Reference to committee: Doc. 11428, Reference No. 3396 of 21 January 2008.
Draft resolution and draft recommendation unanimously
adopted by the committee on 30 September 2008.
Members of the committee: Mr Steingrímur
J. Sigfússon (Chairperson), Mr José Mendes Bota (1st Vice-Chairperson),
Mrs Ingrīda Circene (2nd Vice-Chairperson),
Mrs Anna Čurdová (3rd Vice-Chairperson), Mr Frank
Aaen, Mr Francis Agius (alternate: Ms Marie-Louise Coleiro Preca), Mr John Austin, Mr Lokman Ayva, Ms Marieluise
Beck, Mrs Anna Benaki, Mrs Oksana Bilozir, Ms María Delia Blanco
Terán, Mrs Olena Bondarenko,
Mr Pedrag Bošcović, Mr Jean-Guy Branger,
Mr Igor Chernyshenko (alternate: Ms Svetlana Khorkina),
Mr James Clappison (alternate: Mr Oliver Heald),
Mrs Minodora Cliveti, Mr Vladimiro
Crisafulli, Ms Diana Çuli, Mr Ivica Dačiċ, Mrs Lydie Err, Mrs Catherine Fautrier, Mrs Mirjana
Ferić-Vac, Ms Sonia Fertuzinhos, Mrs Alena Gajdůšková, Mr Guiseppe
Galati, Mrs Claude Greff, Mr Attila Gruber, Mrs Carina Hägg, Mr Ilie Ilaşcu, Mrs Fatme Ilyaz, Ms Francine John-Calame, Ms Nataša Jovanoviċ,
M. Guiorgui Kandelaki, Mrs Birgen Keleş, Mrs Krista Kiuru, Mrs Angela Leahu, Mr Terry Leyden, Mrs Mirjana Malić, Mrs Nursuna
Memecan, Mrs Danguté Mikutiené, Mr Burkhardt Müller-Sönksen, Mrs Christine
Muttonen (alternate: Ms Ana Blatnik),
Mrs Hermine Naghdalyan, Ms Fiamma Nirenstein, Mrs Yuliya Novikova, Mr Mark Oaten (alternate:
Mr Tim Boswell), Mr Kent Olsson, Mr Jaroslav Paška, Mrs Antigoni Papadopoulos, Mr Claudio Podeschi,
Mrs Majda Potrata, Ms Mª del Carmen Quintanilla
Barba, Mr Frédéric Reiss, Mrs Mailis
Reps, Ms Maria Pilar Riba Font,
Ms Jadwiga Rotnicka, Mrs Marlene Rupprecht (alternate: Ms Angelika Graf), Mrs Klára Sándor, Ms Miet
Smet, Mme Albertina Soliani, Mrs Darinka Stantcheva, Mrs Tineke Strik, Mr Michał Stuligrosz, Mrs Doris Stump, Mr Han Ten Broeke, Mr Vasile
Ioan Dănuţ Ungureanu, Mrs Tatiana Volozhinskaya,
Mr Marek Wikiński, Mr Paul
Wille, Mrs Betty Williams,
Mr Gert Winkelmeier, Ms Karin S. Woldseth,
Mrs Gisela Wurm, Mr Andrej
Zernovski, Mr Vladimir Zhidkikh,
Mrs Anna Roudoula Zissi.
N.B. The names of the members who took part in the meeting
are printed in bold.
Secretariat of the committee:
Mrs Kleinsorge, Mrs Affholder, Mrs Devaux.