See related documentsReply to Recommendation
| Doc. 12212
| 26 April 2010
The state of human rights in Europe: the need to eradicate impunity
Author(s): Committee of Ministers
Origin - adopted
at the 1083rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies (21 April 2010) 2010 - Second part-session
Reply to Recommendation: Recommendation 1876
(2009)
1. The Parliamentary
Assembly’s
Recommendation
1876 (2009) on “The state of human rights in Europe: the need to
eradicate impunity” raises serious issues to which the Committee
of Ministers pays considerable attention. It has communicated the
recommendation to the governments of member states and to the Steering Committee
for Human Rights (CDDH), to the European Commission against Racism
and Intolerance (ECRI) and to the European Committee for the Prevention
of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT),
for information and comments. The recommendation has also been transmitted
to the Ad hoc Committee on preventing and combating violence against
women and domestic violence (CAHVIO) for information.
2. The Committee of Ministers considers that the eradication
of impunity is a priority for Council of Europe action. It recalls
that it has instructed the CDDH to examine the feasibility of guidelines
in this field. The latter has reported back that such guidelines
would be feasible and a committee of experts subordinated to the CDDH
has been instructed to draft
the guidelines on the basis of the indications provided by the CDDH
at its last meeting. The instrument is intended to send a clear
signal of Europe’s willingness to end impunity regarding serious
human rights violations. The CDDH has taken note of the Assembly’s
views concerning state secrecy, immunities and measures and remedies
to tackle all forms of impunity, which will be taken into account
in its future work. The committee of experts has held two meetings
and completed a first reading of the draft guidelines. The guidelines
are to be completed by the end of 2010.
3. The Committee of Ministers refers to its reply to Parliamentary
Assembly
Recommendation
1872 (2009) on “The rights of today’s girls: the rights of tomorrow’s
women” and underlines that the future Council of Europe convention
under elaboration by CAHVIO will cover the severest and most widespread
forms of violence against women, including domestic violence and
so-called “honour crimes”.
4. Referring to its role in supervising the execution of judgments
of the European Court of Human Rights, the Committee of Ministers
notes that it is encouraged by the Assembly to explore the possibility
for states to re-open domestic legal proceedings subsequent to a
ruling of the European Court of Human Rights finding the domestic
investigations or proceedings fundamentally flawed, to prevent criminals
from being granted impunity by virtue of the ne
bis in idem rule.
5. As to the Assembly’s invitation to the Committee of Ministers
to examine the advisability of establishing an independent European
committee to investigate serious allegations of gross and systematic
violations of human rights, the Committee stresses the role of the
existing Council of Europe monitoring mechanisms, of the Secretary
General and of the Commissioner for Human Rights. It sees no need
to create an additional structure at this stage.
Appendix 1 to the reply
(open)
Comments by the Steering Committee for
Human Rights (CDDH)
1. The Steering Committee for
Human Rights (CDDH) fully shares concerns expressed by the Parliamentary
Assembly in its
Recommendation
1876 (2009) on “The state of human rights in Europe: the need to
eradicate impunity”.
2. Following the request addressed by the Parliamentary Assembly
to the Committee of Ministers to speed up and intensify its work
on elaborating Council of Europe guidelines on human rights and
the fight against impunity, the CDDH recalls that it was instructed
by the Committee of Ministers to examine the feasibility of guidelines
in this field. The CDDH set up its Committee of Experts on Impunity
(DH-I), which held its first meeting from 9 to 11 September 2009.
The latter had concluded that guidelines against impunity for human rights
violations would be feasible. Whilst leaving a number of questions
open regarding the definition of impunity and the scope of the guidelines,
the Committee had drawn up a preliminary list of possible topics
to be examined. The guidelines would reflect the standards derived
from the Court’s case law and those of the European Committee for
the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment (CPT), as well as, if necessary, other standards which
could prove relevant in the fight against impunity. This instrument
could send a clear signal of Europe’s willingness to end impunity
regarding human rights violations. At its November meeting, the
CDDH had the opportunity to examine the first conclusions of the
DH-I and instructed the latter to start to elaborate the guidelines.
3. The CDDH takes note of the views given by the Parliamentary
Assembly concerning state secrecy, immunities and measures and remedies
to tackle all forms of impunity. These will be taken into account
in the future work of the DH-I, which should be completed during
2010.
Appendix 2 to the reply
(open)
Comments by the European Committee for
the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment (CPT)
The CPT has taken note with great interest of Parliamentary
Assembly Recommendation
1876 (2009). The Committee shares the Assembly’s view that the eradication
of impunity should be a priority for Council of Europe action. The
CPT has emphasised on many occasions, most recently in its 19th
general report, that the credibility of the prohibition of torture
and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment is undermined each time
officials responsible for such offences are not held to account
for their actions. The CPT is contributing to the ongoing work on
elaborating Council of Europe guidelines against impunity for human
rights violations and hopes that work will soon be successfully
completed.