1. Introduction
1. Andorra is a principality of
468 km2 landlocked between the Pyrenees
mountains, on the border between France and Spain, with a total
border length of 120.3 km. This geographical situation has allowed
Andorra to maintain its specific status for more than a thousand
years.
2. The Principality of Andorra is a constitutional democracy.
The current status of Andorra originates from a treaty of 1278 establishing
shared sovereignty, known as the “Coregency”. This legacy was perpetuated
in the 1993 Constitution, which defines Andorra as a parliamentary
Co-principality with a diarchic Head of State, namely the Bishop
of Urgell and the President of the French Republic. Their role is
to ensure respect for the Constitution and facilitate the functioning
of public institutions. The Co-princes rank as Head of State, but political
power is in the hands of the government and the parliament (the Consell general). Under the authority of
its head, the Cap de Govern,
the government directs Andorra’s national and international policy.
The Co-princes are both represented in Andorra by a delegate.
3. Andorra’s main legislative body is the Consell General (parliament),
which is composed of 28 general councillors elected by direct universal
suffrage. Fourteen members are elected from a national constituency under
the proportional system, while the other fourteen members are elected
from the “parishes” or administrative divisions (two MPs for each
of the seven parishes) under a simple majority system with one round
of voting. Slightly less than half of the parliamentary seats are
held by women. The Sindic (President
of Parliament), the Subsindic (Deputy
President) and the Consellers Generals (MPs)
are elected for a four-year term in a general election. The Sindic and the Subsindic cannot serve more than
two consecutive terms of office.
4. After the elections and following an investiture debate, the Consell general elects the head
of government, a choice which is ratified by the Co-princes. The
head of government chooses the other ministers, forming the Govern.
5. The first elections following the adoption of the Constitution
took place in 1993. Since the inception of the system of political
parties under the Constitution, the political scene has been marked
by alignments, mergers or splits of political parties for electoral
purposes. The political spectrum is generally centre-left versus centre-right,
on the one hand, and parish politics versus national politics, on
the other.
6. The April 2011 general elections took place after two years
of government deadlock. The Democrats for Andorra (DA) won 20 seats,
followed by the Social Democratic Party (PS) with six and the Lauredian
Union with two. Antoni Martí became the Head of Government. The
2011 elections marked a change of power from the Social Democratic
Party to the Democrats for Andorra. The last general elections took
place on 1 March 2015 (see below).
7. Local elections will be held in December 2015. The local government
authorities are the parish councils, or Comuns,
which manage local affairs. Each Comú generally
has from 8 to 12 members, who are elected by direct universal suffrage
for a four-year term. The two highest-scoring candidates of the
party, or list, which wins the election become mayor (Consol) and deputy mayor (Consol menor).
8. As a parliamentary Co-principality, Andorra has a joint Head
of State, in the singular. This form of sovereignty dates from 1278
and has evolved over the years, culminating at present in the reign
of the President of the French Republic and of the Spanish Bishop
of Urgell. With the adoption of the 1993 Constitution, international
recognition of the Principality as an independent, law-based, democratic
and social State (Article 1-1 of the Constitution) was no longer
called into question. Andorra went on to sign many international
agreements, including a trilateral treaty of vicinage, friendship
and co-operation with France and Spain in 1993, a trilateral treaty
on the free movement of persons with France and Spain in 2000, a
similar treaty with Portugal in 2007, and a Concordat with the Holy
See in 2008. The country has joined various international organisations;
it became a member of the United Nations in 1993 and of the Council
of Europe one year later, on 10 November 1994.
9. Relations between the European Union and Andorra have been
marked by a high level of stability and co-operation. In particular,
in June 1990 a trade agreement between Andorra and the European
Community established a partial customs union. In November 2004,
an agreement was signed introducing measures equivalent to those
of Council of the European Union Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation
of savings income, and in June 2011 a monetary agreement was signed
between Andorra and the European Union. In November 2012, the Council
of the European Union called for an evaluation of the European Union’s
relations with the sovereign European microstates of Andorra, Monaco
and San Marino. In November 2013, the European Commission concluded
that Association Agreements were the best mechanism to integrate
the microstates into the internal market. In December 2014, the
Council of the European Union approved the launching of negotiations
on such an agreement. In order to develop closer relations with
the European Union, in particular with regard to its increased participation
in the internal market, Andorra has, in recent years, worked to
bring its legislation closer to the acquis
communautaire (see below).
10. Upon its accession to the Council of Europe, Andorra committed
itself to respect the obligations incumbent upon every member State
under Article 3 of the Statute with regard to pluralist democracy,
the rule of law and human rights. As of 30 July 2015, Andorra had
ratified 46 Council of Europe treaties and signed seven additional
treaties without ratification.

In April 2013, Andorra signed the
Convention on Cybercrime (
ETS
No. 185) and its Additional Protocol, concerning the criminalisation
of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer
systems (
ETS
No. 189). In November 2013, Andorra signed the Convention on
Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters as amended by the
2010 Protocol (ETS No. 127). In April 2014, Andorra ratified the
Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual
Exploitation and Sexual Abuse (
CETS
No. 201) and the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and
Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (CETS No.
210). Andorra ratified the Additional Protocol to the Criminal Law
Convention on Corruption (ETS No. 191) and the Protocol No. 15 amending
the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms (CETS No. 213) respectively on 20 February and 27 May 2015.
11. This periodic report was drafted in line with
Resolution 2018 (2014) and the explanatory memorandum approved by the committee
on 17 March 2015.

It was discussed at committee
level on 17 March 2015 and 3 September 2015, taking into account
the comments presented by the Andorran delegation

whom I warmly thank for its valuable contribution.
This report is based on,
inter alia,
the most recent findings of the Council of Europe monitoring mechanisms,
the reports of the Parliamentary Assembly and the Commissioner for
Human Rights and, when relevant, reports prepared by other international
organisations and civil society.
2. Background information
12. Economic relations have had
a strong impact on Andorra’s structural reforms. In recent years,
Andorra had been affected by the global economic crisis. The European
Union and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD) made compliance with international tax standards a condition
for relations with Andorra. In order to stimulate international
ties and build confidence with its European partners, Andorra had
to align itself with common international principles in order to
obtain the endorsement of its western partners.
13. Andorra suffered an economic slow-down in the fields of trade,
banking, construction and tourism, as well as an increasing public
debt (41% of the gross domestic product (GDP) in 2012). After several
difficult years, the Andorran economy is showing signs of recovery.
Despite the intensity of the economic crisis, Andorra still has
one of the highest standards of living in Europe, as shown by its
relative position in terms of GDP per capita: with a GDP of US$37 200,
Andorra ranks 32nd globally. In its Conclusions 2014 on Andorra,

the European Committee for Social
Rights considered that the minimum inter-professional wage does
not ensure a decent standard of living

, in violation of Article
4.1 of the revised European Social Charter (ETS No. 163).

In
April 2014, a law on social and health services was passed, which
provides
inter alia that the amounts
of solidarity-based pensions and other welfare payments cannot be
less than the inter-professional minimum wage of €962 per month.
14. In the past, Andorra maintained bank secrecy laws and levied
no income tax on residents. Its main sources of revenue were registration
fees, property transaction taxes and taxation of capital gains on
property, import taxes and minor sales taxes. As a result of this
tax environment, the Principality was identified by OECD as a tax
haven,

above all due to the lack of transparency.
In 2009, the OECD called on Andorra to bring itself into line with
OECD standards on information exchange. Having done so, the Principality
was then able to sign 23 information exchange agreements and to
be removed from the list of unco-operative tax havens. Further developments
regarding the tax situation in Andorra have since taken place. In
2010, the country introduced corporation tax, a tax on income from
economic activities and income tax for persons who are not fiscal residents.
In 2012, Andorra adopted value added tax (VAT), and in 2014 personal
income tax, which has been in force since 1 January 2015. In recent
years, the Andorran authorities have thus made an effort to establish transparency
and co-operation in tax and financial matters and to bring the relevant
legislation into line with European and OECD standards.
15. Closer integration into the internal market is essential for
Andorra, as its main trading partners are the EU member States,
representing more than 95% of its exports and 90% of its imports.
In March 2014, as mentioned above, the European Commission issued
a recommendation to open negotiations with Andorra on an Association
Agreement. As from the launch of these negotiations, in April 2015,
the parties agreed to ensure the implementation of the principles
of the European Single Market while taking into account the particular situation
of the country. In parallel, and following the OECD’s recommendations,
in November 2013 Andorra signed the new single global standard for
the automatic exchange of financial accounting information, developed
by the OECD and endorsed by the G20. In March 2014, the European
Council’s conclusions confirmed that the European Union would follow
the principles of the OECD model for the revision of the savings
taxation agreements between the European Union and Andorra. The
OECD and the European Union have repeatedly encouraged Andorra to
comply with and implement the standards on good governance in fiscal
transparency and co-operation matters and have welcomed the changes
made in recent years.
16. Since 2012, the government, with the backing of parliament
(the Consell General), has taken measures to modernise and diversify
the economy and open up the markets in line with international standards.
For example, in 2012 the Foreign Direct Investment Law was passed,
making possible an economic opening of the country. With a view
to containing public spending, an investments limitation policy
has also been implemented so as to avoid driving up public deficits,
and civil service salaries have been frozen. In parallel, valued
added tax was introduced in 2012 at a general rate of 4.5%, with
reduced rates of 0%, 1% and 2.5% for certain goods and services
and a higher rate of 9.5% on banking services. Income tax, at a
flat rate of 10%, has been in force since 1 January 2015 (see paragraph
14 above). A number of laws were enacted in 2014 to align Andorra
with international standards, particularly regarding trade, organisational
requirements and operations in the financial sector and the rationalisation
of public spending. In November 2013, the government signed the OECD
Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax
Matters and the Council of Europe Convention on Mutual Administrative
Assistance in Tax Matters as amended by the 2010 Protocol (ETS No. 127),
which it has yet to ratify (see paragraph 10 above).
17. The banking sector in Andorra recently faced a scandal following
the accusations made on 10 March 2015 by FinCEN, the financial intelligence
agency of the US Treasury, against Banca Privada d’Andorra (BPA). FinCEN
accused the country’s fourth largest bank of being a primary vehicle
for money laundering. The day following this announcement all of
the bank’s foreign correspondent accounts were blocked. The Andorran authorities,
through the INAF (the country’s financial oversight body), took
control of the running of the bank and its chief executive was arrested.

This scandal raises risks for Andorra’s
financial industry, which accounts for almost 20% of its GDP. Moreover,
since BPA held a majority share in the capital of a Spanish private
bank, Banco Madrid, Spain’s anti-corruption prosecutors conducted
an investigation to determine whether similar activities had taken
place in Spain, leading to bankruptcy proceedings regarding the
Spanish bank.

The crisis also had repercussions
elsewhere, such as in Panama where BPA had another subsidiary. Despite
the Andorran authorities’ rapid and firm reaction to the BPA scandal,
the reputation of the country’s financial industry has suffered
and efforts must continue to preserve Andorra’s four other banks
from the effects on their growth prospects and stability. The recently
elected parliament took very rapid action along these lines on 2 April
2015, with the adoption of a “Law on urgent measures to implement
restructuring and resolution mechanisms for banks”, which transposes
Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and the Council into
Andorran law. Under the monetary agreement in force, the directive
was to be transposed before 2018. The BPA scandal merely speeded
up the process. Through this law, the authorities were able to avoid
the receivership and bankruptcy of BPA, which would have battered
its customers and creditors and undermined the Andorran banking
system in general. In accordance with this new law, a State agency
for resolution of banks (AREB) was established and tasked with setting
up a “good bank”, by the autumn of 2015, to receive BPA’s legally
sound assets, as certified by the internationally renowned audit
firm PricewaterhouseCoopers. The purpose of this good bank will
be either to sell the bank’s assets as a whole, safeguarding its
staff’s jobs as far as possible, or to sell them in separate batches.
The toxic assets will remain grouped in the “bad bank”, which will
have to face creditors’ claims before being liquidated. It must
be noted that this crisis has occurred at a crucial time in Andorra’s
history, since the country is reforming its economy so as to enhance
economic transparency.
3. Democracy
18. Andorra had a population of
70 570 in 2014.

Due to the economic crisis and the
subsequent rise in unemployment, the annual population growth rate
decreased by 0,6% between 2010 and 2012. Between 2012 and 2014,
there was an increase in population of 1.16%.

19. Less than 50% of the population have Andorran citizenship.
The population is composed of more than 100 different nationalities.
Persons born in Andorra of non-Andorran parents obtain provisional
Andorran citizenship until they reach the age of majority, when
it becomes final if they so request. Persons born in Andorra or
abroad with one Andorran parent have Andorran citizenship. The legislation
is stringent since it requires a minimum of 20 years of legal residency
to acquire Andorran nationality, except in the event of marriage
with an Andorran citizen, in which case citizenship can be acquired
after three years of marriage. If the foreign spouse has been resident
in Andorra for at least three years, he or she can acquire citizenship
upon marrying an Andorran citizen. After his last visit to Andorra
in 2012, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights

called on the Andorran Government
to ease the requirements for applications for Andorran citizenship.
In this connection, the Commissioner recommended the ratification
by Andorra of the European Convention on Nationality. In its 2012
report on Andorra,

the European Commission against Racism
and Intolerance (ECRI) recommended that the Andorran authorities
explore ways of introducing dual citizenship in national legislation,
even if that entailed a constitutional reform. Andorra has still
not signed or ratified the European Convention on Nationality. To
introduce the concept of dual citizenship the country must amend
its Constitution.
20. Voting is only open to Andorran citizens. Residents who are
not Andorran citizens do not have the right to vote. Consequently,
almost two thirds of the population cannot vote in local elections.
In its 2012 report,

ECRI
recommended that the Andorran authorities grant non-Andorrans the
right to take part in local elections. Postal votes for non-resident
citizens were put in place

for the March 2015 elections
for the first time and 100 postal voters were registered. There
were a total of 24 509 registered voters in March 2015.
21. The General Council was dissolved on 16 January 2015, after
the approval of the general budget for 2015, and the general elections
were held on 1 March 2015. Municipal elections are foreseen for
December 2015.
22. The political parties registered for the 2015 general elections
were: “Demòcrates per Andorra” (DA), headed by Antoni Martí i Petit
(the incumbent Head of Government); “Junts”, the coalition of the
Partit Socialdemòcrata d’Andorra, Verds d’Andorra (the Greens) and
Iniciativa Ciutadana I, led by Pere López Agràs; “Socialdemocràcia
i Progrés” (SDP), led by Víctor Naudi Zamora; “Liberals d’Andorra”
(L’dA), led by Josep Pintat i Forné. At the Parish level an independent
party called “Unió Laurediana” was registered in Sant Julià de Lòria.
23. The campaign focused on the economic, fiscal and social reforms
undertaken by the incumbent government, including the introduction
of income tax, the opening up to foreign investments, the reform
of the CASS (the Andorran social security scheme), and the signature
of double taxation agreements with France, Luxembourg, Portugal
and Spain. The liberals (L’dA) questioned the fiscal model of the
incumbent government and called for a competitive system respectful
of Andorra’s identity. They recommended that direct taxes be reduced
to a strict minimum, the maintenance of indirect taxes and modification
in the taxation of income by taxing only their income of Andorran
origin, whereas the current law takes the worldwide income; they considered
the double taxation agreements with Spain and France as contrary
to Andorra’s specificities. For them, further EU integration was
not the best solution, and they wished to submit the agreement with
the European Union to a referendum. The social democrats (SDP) recommended
a balanced system of limited taxation promoting competitiveness
and demonstrating Andorra’s will to open up. The Junts deplored
the economic situation and contested the undermining of social rights
and the unfairness of the income tax system; they called for a proportional
income tax and a system giving priority to social policies, in particular
an increase in the minimum inter-professional wage in conformity
with the revised Social Charter. The incumbent Democrats (DA) acknowledged
that during their term of office they had encountered difficulties
in explaining to the population the benefits brought by the social
security reforms, the legislation adopted in the welfare, social and
health fields, the arrangements concerning civil servants’ supplementary
pensions, the rationalisation of public spending, the introduction
of a moderate level of fiscal regulation, and the signature of double
taxation treaties, all with the aim of opening up the markets and
boosting growth. They underlined the need to adopt a fiscal system
acceptable to Andorra’s European neighbours and sought to explain
the opportunities the country might derive from access to the EU
internal market under an Association Agreement with the European
Union, which they would submit to a referendum.
24. The campaign also focused on the issue of abortion, which
is illegal on any grounds based on Article 108 of the Criminal Code.
According to its Article 8-1, “[t]he Constitution recognises the
right to life and fully protects life in all its phases”. Both the
SDP and the Junts were favourable to new legislation on the issue
to authorise abortion in certain cases. The DA and Ld’A considered
that the question endangered not only the Constitution, but also
Andorra’s institutional framework, in view of the fact that a bishop
was joint Head of State, and posed a threat to the country as a
Co-principality.
25. The Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights of
the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE/ODIHR)
undertook a Needs Assessment Mission (NAM) in January 2015 and concluded
that “all interlocutors expressed their overall confidence in the
electoral process and no issues were brought to the attention of
the OSCE/ODIHR NAM that would necessitate the immediate involvement
of the OSCE/ODIHR)”.

Overall, the legal framework was
considered satisfactory,

as well as the impartiality
and efficiency of both the election administration and the electoral
dispute resolution system.
26. The elections confirmed the overall majority of the incumbent
party “Demòcrates per Andorra” headed by Antoni Martí i Petit. Despite
a loss of five seats, “Demòcrates per Andorra” secured 15 out of
28 seats in the General Council. The Liberals d’Andorra secured
8 seats, the coalition Junts 3 seats and the SDP 2 seats.
4. Human rights and fundamental
freedoms
27. Andorra has ratified Protocol
No. 12 to the European Convention on Human Rights (ETS No. 177).
Its Constitution and legislation declare all persons equal before
the law and prohibit discrimination on grounds of birth, race, gender,
origin, religion, opinions, or any other personal or social condition.
28. In the past, whilst having the same rights and freedoms as
Andorran citizens in principle, non-citizens lacked access to some
of the social benefits provided by law. In its third

and fourth

reports, ECRI recommended that the
Andorran authorities introduce policies to promote the integration
of non-Andorrans in all areas, including the labour market. This
was one of the three specific recommendations for which ECRI requested
priority implementation in its fourth report. ECRI insisted that
this policy address the problems faced by seasonal workers, and
raise public awareness of the importance of a diverse society. Andorra
is not a member of the ILO. It has neither signed nor ratified the
Additional Protocol to the European Social Charter providing for
a system of collective complaints.
29. The Andorran authorities have recently amended the existing
regulations to ensure that non-citizen residents receive the same
social and economic benefits as citizens. In 2014, the General Council
passed a law on social services giving access to social services
and other benefits to all residents. Based on this legislation,
access is given to residents, without discrimination, to economic
and technical benefits and services (social benefits provided for
by the law include education, higher education, housing, social
aid, family welfare). For example, minimum residence requirements
for access to social welfare have been lifted, and migrant and seasonal
workers are provided with full health coverage. In its conclusions
on the implementation of the recommendations in respect of Andorra
subject to interim follow up,

ECRI welcomed all the measures taken by
the authorities in the field of integration which had marked substantial
progress in the field and concluded that this recommendation had
been implemented.
30. Another priority issue raised by the ECRI was the lack of
comprehensive and exhaustive criminal legislation relating to racism
and intolerance. The principle of the sharing of the burden of proof
in case of discrimination complaints should be applied, and judges,
prosecutors and lawyers should be trained on racism and racial discrimination.
In its conclusions on the interim follow-up,

ECRI
noted that the recommendation regarding training had not yet been
implemented but welcomed as a promising initiative the reform project
in the judicial field, which the Andorran authorities could use
as an opportunity to implement its recommendation. ECRI considered
that its recommendation on the burden of proof was not implemented.
31. Andorra signed the Additional Protocol to the Convention on
Cybercrime concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and
xenophobic nature committed through computer systems in April 2013,
but has not yet ratified it.
32. The
2012
ECRI report recommended that legislation on asylum seekers and refugees
be enacted. In November 2013, on the occasion of the consideration
of the United Nations Committee against Torture’s report on Andorra,

the Andorran delegation confirmed
that there were still no national laws on refugees. According to
the delegation, very few foreign nationals come to the country due
to Andorra’s geographical location and thus the current legislation
is adequate to provide asylum and other permits on an ad hoc basis.
33. Andorra has neither signed nor ratified the Framework Convention
for the Protection of National Minorities and the European Charter
for Regional or Minority Languages. As regards the Framework Convention,
the authorities have stated that due to the geographical and historic
specificity of the Principality of Andorra, Andorran citizens have
never represented the net majority of the population and that the
concept of “national minority” would therefore not be fitting.
34. In the field of media freedom, while the 2014 Freedom House

report on Andorra was rather positive, Andorra’s
rank in the
World
Press Freedom Index represents the sharpest fall between 2014 and 2015:
it ranked 32nd, falling by 27 places “due to the lack of independence
of its media from financial, political and religious interests”.

Reporters Without Borders has denounced
“many conflicts of interests and the great difficulty experienced
by journalists in covering the activities of Andorran banks, coupled
with the lack of any legal protection for freedom of information,
such as the confidentiality of journalists’ sources”. This latest development
raises potential concerns that will need to be followed closely.
In November 2014, Andorra passed a law entitled Civil Law Protection
of the Rights to Privacy, Honour and Personal Reputation, which aims
to protect individuals from abuses of these rights.
35. Concerning domestic violence, the Commissioner for Human Rights
noted after his visit to Andorra in 2012 that further prevention
efforts were needed. The Commissioner recommended that the authorities continue
to give priority to extending assistance to victims of domestic
violence and to allow longer stays in shelters.

In April
2014, Andorra ratified the Convention on Preventing and Combating
Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention),
triggering its entry into force on 1 August 2014. On 15 January
2015, during the last session before its dissolution, the parliament
passed a law to combat domestic violence, which had been jointly
proposed by the three parliamentary groups.
36. In its report published in September 2014,

the Group of Experts on Action against
Trafficking in Human Beings (GRETA) noted the existence of a framework
for assisting victims of domestic violence, under the responsibility
of the Ministry of Health and Welfare and based on an action protocol
specifying the different roles of stakeholders. A dedicated department
had been set up in 2006 within the Ministry, and agreements had
been concluded with NGOs. Domestic violence victims were allocated
financial assistance and received counselling. Under an agreement
concluded with the Bar Association of Andorra, free legal assistance
could be provided if they had insufficient resources. Victims of
violence could be accommodated by the Domestic Violence Department
in specific premises for up to nine months. Once the monitoring
mechanism for the Istanbul Convention, GREVIO (Group of Experts
on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence),
becomes operational, the implementation of the Istanbul Convention
by Andorra will be evaluated.
37. Concerning trafficking in human beings, no victims of trafficking
were identified in Andorra at the time of GRETA’s reporting.

In
its report, GRETA took note of the absence of a specialised authority
on the fight against human trafficking and underlined the need to
raise awareness amongst vulnerable groups (vulnerable children and
women and migrant workers in particular) on the risks of human trafficking.
The Committee of the Parties to the Council of Europe Convention
on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (CETS No. 197) recommended

that a proactive approach
to the identification of victims of human trafficking be taken.
It also recommended the adoption of a legislation establishing trafficking
in human beings as a criminal offence in conformity with Article
4 of the Convention, and of the relevant measures to provide assistance
and protection to all victims of trafficking including by increasing
the awareness of the actors concerned. It has called on the authorities
to provide in law for a recovery and reflection period for victims
of trafficking, for the possibility to issue renewable residence
permits and to refrain from deportation once the identification
process is started. Since then, on 16 July 2015, the Andorran Parliament
adopted law 10/2015 amending the criminal code with regard to the
legal qualification of trafficking in human beings. These legislative
changes will be examined by GRETA in its second evaluation cycle.
38. There is no other specific concern to be raised relating to
the protection and promotion of human rights in Andorra.
5. Rule of law
39. Six applications against Andorra
were pending before the European Court of Human Rights in May 2015. Most
of the judgments delivered by the Court concerned Article 6 of the
European Convention on Human Rights, but do not seem to highlight
basic structural issues.
40. With regard to the judicial system, according to the 2014
Freedom House report,

the government generally respects
the independence of the judiciary. Defendants enjoy the presumption
of innocence and the right to a fair trial.
41. The government has recently worked on a judicial reform. Between
2013 and January 2015, the Andorran Parliament passed the Qualified
Law on Justice, amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure, amendments
to the Transitional Law on Court Proceedings, a law on bailiffs,
a law on seizure, a law on arbitration and various amendments to
the Criminal Code. The purpose being to have an integrated legal framework
for the judiciary, governing the membership, status and powers of
the Higher Council of Justice and the careers of judges and magistrates.
With this first reform package, improvements have been made to the management
of judicial organisation and the allocation of criminal cases. Applicable
procedural rules have been set regarding the review of domestic
judgments deriving from the judgments of the European Court of Human
Rights.
42. In the field of corruption, GRECO published its Third Round
Evaluation Report on Andorra in June 2011, which found that further
amendments to the Criminal Code were necessary to comply with Council
of Europe standards and called for considerable changes to the legislation
on political financing. In its third Round Compliance Report on
Andorra,

adopted in October 2013, GRECO noted
that Andorra had satisfactorily implemented only three of the twenty
recommendations from the 2011 report (twelve were partially implemented
and five were not implemented). It stated that Andorra was able
to show that substantial reforms were in progress, offering the
potential to achieve an adequate level of compliance with the outstanding recommendations
in the next 18 months and asked the Andorran delegation to provide
it with a progress report on implementation of the outstanding recommendations
by 30 April 2015 at the latest. Based on this situation report,
GRECO is now expected to assess the implementation of the outstanding
recommendations in the following months.
43. GRECO acknowledged that Andorra was legally equipped to respond
to a certain extent to the requirements of the Criminal Law Convention
on Corruption. However, the restrictive manner in which some of the
bribery and trading in influence offences were incriminated could
explain in part the absence of prosecutions and convictions for
such offences, and even of cases pending. Andorra needed to provide
stiffer penalties for bribery and trading in influence offences.
44. GRECO noted that thanks to legislative improvements, undue
advantage was no longer necessarily of a financial nature but could
take any form, and the concepts of third-party beneficiary and indirect
bribery had been introduced. Bribery of members of parliament from
other countries had also been established as an offence. Improvements
were noted with regard to bribery of jurors and arbitrators. However,
Andorra continued to avail itself of its right of reserve regarding
bribery offences in the private sector and trading in influence. According
to GRECO, a number of other questions still needed to be addressed
notably the issue of extraterritorial jurisdiction of its judicial
authorities and the conditions for extinguishment from liability
based on the “effective regret” provision. On 20 February 2015,
Andorra ratified the Additional Protocol to the Criminal Law Convention
on Corruption (
ETS
No. 191), following GRECO’s recommendation.
45. Concerning the transparency of political party financing,
in its 2011 report GRECO called on the authorities to make considerable
changes to its legislation by requiring, in particular, that political
groupings publish their accounts on a regular basis (including the
names of major donors and support in kind). GRECO insisted on the
need for a more effective supervision of political financing and
for a more extended range of proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.
The GRECO 2013 compliance report noted that out of its ten recommendations
related to transparency of political financing, none were satisfactorily
implemented. At the time of the preparation of the GRECO compliance
report, work at national level was ongoing on the preparation of
the “Political parties’ bill”. While acknowledging the improvements
foreseen in the draft legislation, such as the rules on various
sources of funding used by parties and monitoring of their annual
accounts, the GRECO report highlighted certain aspects requiring
further clarification, such as the scope of application, interlinking and
harmonisation of the legislation, the annual publication of parties’
accounts and publication of the names of major donors. In the meantime,
on 19 September 2014, the law on the funding of political parties
and election campaigns was adopted by the General Council, and was
implemented during the general elections of 1 March 2015. GRECO
is expected to assess the newly adopted legislation. The situation
report on further implementation of the GRECO recommendations was
due for submission on 30 April 2015. This new legislation will be
assessed in this framework.
46. Concerning money laundering and financing of terrorism, at
its 44th plenary meeting in Strasbourg from 31 March to 4 April
2014, the Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering
Measures and the Financing of Terrorism (MONEYVAL) took note of
a follow-up report on Andorra that is still confidential. While
acknowledging some progress in the legislation on money laundering
and terrorist financing offences, in its previous public report
of 2012 MONEYVAL
insisted on the need to improve measures to combat money laundering
and terrorist financing. Although Andorra had the necessary legislation
for the seizure and confiscation of criminal assets in place, criminal
justice bodies’ effectiveness remains insufficient due to the lack
of means. No regulatory framework for freezing terrorist assets
in accordance with United Nations Security Council Resolutions had
been adopted. In the field of preventive measures, further improvements
were still needed and the supervision mechanisms in place to ensure
compliance appeared to lack effectiveness. The report also concluded
that the Andorran Financial Intelligence Unit had insufficient human
and technical resources to perform its tasks. While Andorra’s international
co-operation system and practice appeared sound and effective, there
were some deficiencies regarding exchange of information and co-operation
with foreign supervisory authorities.
47. In the meantime, in November 2014, the government approved
amendments to the Law on international criminal co-operation and
the fight against money laundering and the financing of terrorism
that are based on the old recommendation 26 of the Financial Action
Task Force (FATF) – new Recommendation 29. Their aim is to strengthen
the autonomy of the Financial Intelligence Unit (former “FIU”, now
the “UIFAND”) by regulating its composition (including the appointment
and dismissal of its Director), competences and functions, and to improve
the processing and notification to the law-enforcement agencies.
In its follow-up report of September 2015, MONEYVAL will assess
these legislative provisions as well as the amendments to the Criminal
Code, to the law on criminal procedure and to the Law on Insurance
which were adopted by the parliament on 16 July 2015. These changes
are aimed inter alia at increasing
the criminal penalties for very serious cases of smuggling, introducing
an offence of self-laundering and establishing anti-money laundering
supervision for insurance-related activities.
48. In 2012, the Council of Europe Committee for the Prevention
of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT)
published its report

on its last visit of 2011 together
with the authorities’ comments. Since then, in the framework of
the consideration by the United Nations Committee against Torture in
November 2013,

the authorities have reported on
their efforts to improve the infrastructure of detention facilities,
regulations, conditions of detention of minors, health and sanitary
issues as well as training for prison staff. At this stage, there
is no information on a future CPT visit to Andorra.
49. There is no other specific concern in the area of the rule
of law in Andorra.
6. Conclusions
and recommendations
50. Overall, Andorra has been honouring
its membership obligations to the Council of Europe in the period under
review.
51. The country has carried out a number of important reforms
in recent years, demonstrating its clear capacity and will to reconcile
its European identity with its domestic specificities. The country
is engaged in a reform of its economy so as to enhance economic
transparency and has progressed in the implementation of standards
on good governance in fiscal transparency and co-operation matters,
as acknowledged by its international partners.
52. The ongoing judicial reform has already resulted in improvements
in the justice system, notably concerning the management of judicial
organisation and the allocation of criminal cases. The reform needs
to be further continued, notably with regard to changes in career
management in the judicial field.
53. In addition, the country has made substantial efforts to develop
an effective integration policy striving to increase the level of
integration of non-Andorrans. Important reforms have been carried
out with regard to economic welfare benefits, entitling all people
resident in Andorra to social and other services. A more accomplished
integration policy could benefit from a greater involvement of non-Andorrans
in the democratic processes.
54. The ratification in 2014 of the Convention on the Protection
of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse and the
Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence
against Women and Domestic Violence further demonstrate Andorra’s
commitment to the protection and promotion of human rights, as does
the adoption by the Andorran Consell General in January 2015 of
a law to combat domestic violence.
55. Andorra has so far not signed/ratified certain Council of
Europe conventions. Based notably on the findings of the main Council
of Europe monitoring mechanisms, Andorra should be encouraged, inter alia, to sign and ratify the
European Convention on Nationality and the Additional Protocol to
the European Social Charter providing for a system of collective
complaints. I welcome the announcement by authorities that they will
ratify the Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime,
concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic
nature committed through computer systems by the end of 2015.
56. The question of the lack of independence of the media from
financial, political and religious interests remains a potential
source of concern that will need to be followed closely. The independence
of the media needs to be guaranteed both in principle and in practice,
and measures should be taken by the authorities to ensure that pressure
is not exerted on them.
57. The authorities have recently reported to GRECO and MONEYVAL
on the action initiated for the implementation of their recommendations,
which will be assessed in the following months by the specialised monitoring
bodies. The authorities should continue with the implementation
of the outstanding GRECO and MONEYVAL recommendations, taking into
account the conclusions of their forthcoming reports.
58. In the light of the findings of the Council of Europe monitoring
mechanisms, a certain number of additional issues raise concerns
and should be addressed by the authorities before the next periodic
review. The committee therefore recommends that the authorities:
58.1. further implement the recommendations
of ECRI and continue efforts towards the adoption and implementation
of a comprehensive criminal legislation relating to racism and intolerance;
58.2. work on the preparation of a national legislation on asylum
seekers and refugees;
58.3. further develop the means to ease the residence requirement
for application for Andorran citizenship and explore ways to introduce
dual citizenship into national legislation.
58.4. explore the legal possibility to grant non-Andorrans the
right to take part in local elections;
58.5. implement the recommendations made by GRETA and the Committee
of the Parties to combat trafficking in human beings in particular
the proactive approach towards identification of victims and the measures
to be taken to provide assistance and protection to all victims.