1. Introduction
1. On 1 April 2017, the Russian
newspaper
Novaya Gazeta published
its first findings about discrimination and crimes against homosexuals
in the Chechen Republic, alleging extra-judicial killings, torture,
enforced disappearances, arbitrary detentions, harassment and intimidation
on the ground of sexual orientation.
The journalists estimated that the
campaign of persecution had started in February 2017, against the
backdrop of systematic harassment. The newspaper published several
follow-up reports throughout 2017, all alarming.
2. The international community reacted with shock and astonishment.
Several European political leaders condemned these alleged human
rights violations and called on the Russian authorities to launch
an official investigation.
3. In May 2017, following international reactions, President
Vladimir Putin reportedly ordered law-enforcement agencies to support
Russia's Commissioner for Human Rights in addressing what he called
the “rumours” of abuse in the Chechen Republic.
4. Amongst those who reacted were several members of the Parliamentary
Assembly. In April 2017, Mr Jonas Gunnarsson, my predecessor as
General Rapporteur on the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender
and intersex (LGBTI) people, and Mr Frank Schwabe, rapporteur on
“Human rights in the North Caucasus: what follow-up to
Resolution 1738 (2010)?”, issued a joint statement.
The following month, Mr Johan Nissinen
(Sweden, NR) and other members of the Assembly tabled a motion for
a resolution on “Alleged extreme discrimination and crimes against
homosexuals in the Chechen Republic (Russian Federation)”, asking
the Assembly to look into this matter and make any appropriate recommendations.
The Committee on Equality and Non-Discrimination
appointed me as rapporteur during the October 2017 part-session.
2. Scope of the report and sources
5. The authors of the motion expressed
concern at the “numerous reports of extreme, State-initiated discrimination
and crimes against homosexuals, especially males, in the Chechen
Republic (Russian Federation) – resulting in alleged detentions
in camps, beatings and torture by uniformed State personnel, and disappearances
– in certain cases said to be followed by executions”.
6. In the course of my work, I decided to enlarge the scope of
the report to cover not only homosexual men but all LGBTI people.
In addition, I proposed to change the title so that the subject
matter was clearer: in the Chechen Republic, LGBTI people are subjected
to various forms of discrimination, ill-treatment and violence which
are so serious, systematic and widespread as to amount to persecution.
Furthermore, this persecution is either conducted directly by the
Chechen authorities or is condoned and even promoted by them, at
the highest political level.
7. This is not the first time the Assembly has discussed the
matter. In its
Resolution
2157 (2017) “Human rights in the North Caucasus: what follow-up
to
Resolution 1738 (2010)?”, the Assembly clearly stated that: “Considering the
alarming reports of abductions of hundreds of men in Chechnya based
on their alleged sexual orientation, the Assembly urged the Russian
Federation to carry out an immediate and transparent investigation
into these reports in order to bring to justice those responsible
and to ensure the safety of the LGBTI community in the North Caucasus,
as well as human rights defenders and journalists reporting such violations.”
Another report is currently being prepared by Mr Frank Schwabe (Germany,
SOC) on “The continuing need to restore human rights and the rule
of law in the North Caucasus region” for the Committee on Legal
Affairs and Human Rights.
8. This report casts light on the wave of persecution against
the LGBTI community in the Chechen Republic in 2017. I hope that
it will give a voice to all those victims who have decided to remain
silent, fearing retaliation against themselves and their families.
It should also make all of us as politicians aware of the challenges
which LGBTI people still have to face in Europe in the 21st century.
9. In preparing the report, I relied on secondary sources, such
as media and reports of non-governmental organisations (NGOs), as
well as on the information I obtained through various meetings with
people who have been directly involved or affected. I met representatives
of several NGOs providing support to LGBTI people from the Chechen
Republic and several victims of the persecution against LGBTI people
who have fled the Chechen Republic. These meetings were held in
several Council of Europe member States. I also had the opportunity
to meet Mr Maxim Lapunov, the only victim who has so far formally
lodged a complaint.
10. I would also like to point out that Ms Tatyana Moskalkova,
Commissioner for Human Rights of the Russian Federation, was invited
to participate in a hearing of the Committee on Equality and Non-Discrimination
to contribute to this report. I regret that the invitation was turned
down and that she did not provide any written information.
11. Ms Tanya Lokshina, Russia programme director at Human Rights
Watch, based in Moscow, and Mr Igor Kochetkov, Director of the Russian
LGBT Network, provided valuable information for this report when
they attended a hearing which was jointly organised by the Committee
on Equality and Non-Discrimination and the Committee on Legal Affairs
and Human Rights on 24 April 2018 in Strasbourg. I would like to
thank them for their participation and commend their courage for
the actions taken to support victims of the anti-LGBTI campaign,
and in general for their outstanding support to victims of discrimination
and violence on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity
in a challenging context.
3. Attitude
towards LGBTI people in the Russian Federation
12. In the past few years, along
with the insistence in public discourse on traditional gender roles
and family values, a climate of rising homophobia has been perceptible
throughout the Russian Federation. This climate was epitomised by
the adoption of the law prohibiting the so-called propaganda of
non-traditional sexual relationships among minors in 2013, in spite
of international criticism.
This law has
inspired similar initiatives in other countries.
13. International reactions denouncing the risks presented by
the adoption of this kind of legislation have not triggered change
and it appears that this legislation is still rather popular today.
In 2017, in its judgment in the case of
Bayev
and Others v. Russia,
the
European Court of Human Rights found that it violated Articles 10 (freedom
of expression) and 14 (protection from discrimination) of the European
Convention on Human Rights (ETS No. 5).
14. Several years after the entry into force of this law in 2013,
Human Rights Watch found “an increase in discrimination and violence
against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people and
activists. The law sends a message that LGBT people are second-class
citizens posing a threat to children and public morality”.
15. In a poll published at the beginning of 2018, the Levada Center,
a Russian polling agency, found
that “83 percent of Russians thought gay sex was “always reprehensible”
or “almost always reprehensible”. Videos presenting LGBTI people
as Western agents, dangerous persons, threats to political stability
and to traditional values circulate on social media and contribute
to this homophobic climate. Homophobic videos were available on
internet during the last presidential campaign in 2018, calling
on people to vote so as to avoid chaos.
Legislation, media reports and
political statements contribute to creating a climate encouraging
homophobic attitudes.
16. On the rainbow map
released by the International Lesbian,
Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA) on 14 May 2018,
the Russian Federation has a score of 11% and is at the bottom of
the list of European countries as regards equality for LGBTI people.
17. The anti-LGBTI campaign which occurred in the Chechen Republic
in 2017 did not trigger a strong opposition in public opinion in
the Russian Federation. Rising homophobia and support for anti-propaganda legislation
are signs of an overall context which can lead to the acceptance
or toleration of discrimination and violence against LGBTI people.
18. On 14 May, Alexander Konovalov, Minister of Justice of the
Russian Federation, addressing the Human Rights Council in the context
of the 30th Session of Universal Periodic Review, in his reply to
comments from other delegations, denied the existence of LGBTI people
in the Chechen Republic.
This kind of statement by high-ranking
Russian officials defies common sense and is deeply disturbing.
4. Gender
roles, the promotion of traditional values and so-called “honour”
crimes
19. One also needs to look into
the overall context in the Chechen Republic in order to understand
the situation. While this report addresses discrimination and extreme
violence against a specific group, there is an overall climate of
impunity and absence of rule of law in the Republic.
20. Human rights defenders have been and continue to be threatened.
In this context, I will mention only the arrest on 10 January 2018
of Mr Oyub Titiyev, Head of the Memorial Office in Grozny, since
the report by Mr Schwabe will provide a more detailed insight into
the pressure and attacks against them. Ms Elena Milashina, journalist
at Novaya Gazeta who investigated
the purge, has received death threats in connection with her work
in the Chechen Republic.
21. Since he consolidated his power in the Chechen Republic in
2007, Ramzan Kadyrov has had a free hand to promote his vision of
a traditional society. He has presented himself as the guardian
of tradition, religion and authority. He has stated that his mission
is to cleanse the nation of all deviations, including alcohol and
drugs.
He has also made reference to the
need to cleanse the blood of the nation,
using repressive tools. The use of
aggressive and barbaric language contributes to creating a climate
of fear. He stated that a man had to be a man and a woman should
stay a woman, promoting a traditional definition of gender roles
in society.
22. In addition to these general statements, President Kadyrov
urged women to adopt righteous behaviour and launched campaigns
to impose a certain dress code. In 2013, our committee held a hearing
on women’s rights in the North Caucasus, during which members received
information on the systematic harassment of women not respecting
the dress code in the Chechen Republic
or
not behaving honourably. Some women were killed by their families
for “inappropriate” behaviour. Families are allegedly washing their
tarnished “honour” by taking care of the “problem” directly. “The
legal system tends to close its eyes to crimes committed in adat’s
name”,
reported the International Crisis
Group. So-called “honour” crimes are perpetrated with full impunity.
Families are called on to assume their responsibility to protect
and preserve their honour.
23. The United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination
against Women (CEDAW) expressed concern at harmful practices and
violence against women in the North Caucasus in its concluding observations
in 2010
and 2015:
“The Committee remains concerned
at the increasing prevalence of violence against women in the northern
Caucasus, as well as of harmful practices, such as child and/or
forced marriage, abduction of women and girls for forced marriage,
crimes in the name of so-called honour, female genital mutilation
and polygamy, notwithstanding the criminalization of such practices
by federal law. The Committee is concerned that such harmful practices
appear to be socially legitimized and surrounded by a culture of
silence and impunity. The Committee reiterates its previous concern
(see CEDAW/C/USR/CO/7, para. 10) that the federal Government may
lack the will and an efficient mechanism to ensure the application of
federal legislation in the regions and autonomous entities to fully
implement the Convention coherently and consistently.”
24. Being LGBTI means contravening the so-called traditional society
where a couple is composed of a woman and a man. In the Chechen
Republic, coming out often means being shunned by the family. Homosexuality
is considered a disease and a provocation. LGBTI people are forced
to hide their sexual orientation and are obliged to live a secret
life. They fear being rejected, beaten up, tortured, abducted or
even killed if they come out. When the police or security forces
discover that a person is LGBTI, they threaten systematically to
tell the family if the person does not give them a certain sum of
money.
5. Extra-judicial
killings, arbitrary detention and use of torture against LGBTI people
in the Chechen Republic
25. During the bilateral meetings
I have held with victims and witnesses of this targeted persecution,
I have received first-hand information about the use of torture,
mistreatment and arbitrary detention against LGBTI people in the
Chechen Republic. Several persons are still missing, including the
pop singer Zelim Bakayev, who is now believed to have died following
his abduction. Novaya Gazeta reported
at least three deaths during the actual purge, but more are feared
since several disappearances have been reported.
26. I met several times with Elena Milashina, journalist at
Novaya Gazeta, who investigated
this targeted persecution. I also had meetings with representatives
of the Russian LGBT network in 2017 and 2018.
This Network helps those fearing
torture and victims of degrading treatment and torture leave the
Chechen Republic. To date, the Russian LGBT Network has helped 114
persons leave the Chechen Republic, including 41 persons who say
they that they had been detained and tortured and 30 family members
who feared for their safety.
They contacted the Network via a
hotline and received shelter in hidden safe houses. Some stayed in
the Russian Federation and others (92) left to go abroad. Victims
are often afraid of seeking justice and fear retaliation, which
may explain why few have officially filed complaints to date.
27. Evidence has been collected by human rights organisations
in order to bring those responsible to justice. Human Rights Watch
documented meticulously the purge through interviewing victims and
witnesses.
The details of victims’ testimonies
tally. When being tortured, victims were interrogated and forced
to give the names of other LGBTI people. Most detainees were outed
to their families. According to Tanya Lokshina, the anti-gay purge
was unique in its magnitude and its horror.
28. I was shocked to discover that, according to testimonies,
Magomed Daudov, Speaker of the Chechen Parliament
had
played a key role in the anti-LGBTI campaign. Human Rights Watch
reported that he watched some of the victims being tortured.
29. High-level Russian officials called for an investigation and
regretted that victims would not file complaints. In September 2017,
Maxim Lapunov, despite security risks, filed an official complaint.
The allegations of persecution could no longer be considered as
rumours.
30. Maxim Lapunov is the first and only victim to officially file
a complaint and to speak out publicly about the anti-LGBTI campaign.
He shared with me his story in person.
He is not Chechen but lived and worked as an events organiser in
the Chechen Republic for two years. He told me he was abducted and
held in captivity from 16 to 28 March 2017 in a basement, where
he was regularly beaten up by Chechen security forces. His captors wanted
information about all the gay persons he knew. They read all the
messages he had on his phone. Several men, speaking Chechen, entered
one after the other the room where he was being detained. Each of them
beat him up, with their hands or with plastic tubes. They would
let him fall and catch his breath and then recommence the beating.
After some time, he was brought to another room, where he was forced
to fight with a Chechen man. He was asked to perform sexual favours
on this man, which he refused, and was again severely beaten. He
lost the sense of time. He told me he did not expect to survive.
He was forced to record a testimony acknowledging he was gay, had
to give names and addresses of family members and his fingerprints were
taken.
31. Intimidations continued after his release. He was warned not
to tell anyone what had happened and that the Chechen diaspora would
find him if he did. He fled the Chechen Republic and joined his
family in the Ural region, but he and his family members received
threats from Chechnya. He then went to Moscow and he asked the Russian
LGBT Network for support. He was provided with medical support,
food, housing, psychological help and, in the end, assistance to
leave the country.
32. Mr Lapunov told me that he met with Ms Moskalkova, Commissioner
for Human Rights of the Russian Federation, in August 2017. She
took his statement and sent it to the federal investigative authorities.
He met several times with investigators, in the presence of his
lawyers. He asked the Russian authorities for State protection but
did not receive a reply. He has now left the Russian Federation
since he feared for his safety.
According to Tanya Lokshina from
Human Rights Watch, “he did not have to face what every Chechen
man caught in the purge feared: being targeted by his own relatives
for tarnishing family honour or exposing his entire family to overwhelming
stigma because of his homosexuality”.
33. I also tried to collect information about the situation of
LBT women. At least 12 women, two of them transwomen, were also
detained by Chechen authorities last year.
LBT women face difficulties
in a Chechen society which promotes traditional gender roles.
The Russian LGBT Network reported
that remaining invisible is a necessary choice for lesbian and bisexual
women in the North Caucasus.
They
are often victims of violence within their families. Several of
them told the Russian LGBT Network that they had been taken to psychiatric
clinics to cure their homosexuality or to mosques for exorcism sessions.
Corrective rapes and forced marriages are considered as ways of
“putting them back on the right track”. Testimonies of transgender people
published in the press describe how the security situation has changed
for them in the past 15 years in the Chechen Republic.
34. Methods used for the persecution of LGBTI people in the Chechen
Republic are similar to the ones used against other vulnerable groups,
including drug users. “Using strategies tested in the fight against
the Islamists, the authorities blacklist families, attacking clan
solidarity. Some detainees accused of being gay are forced to confess
publicly in ‘liberation ceremonies’, which other men in their family
are required to attend … By shaming whole families, the authorities
seek, often successfully, to involve them in repression, forcing
victims to flee their homes; some have to take refuge in a country
where they can elude reprisals from the diaspora. Women are forced
into exile if they wish to pursue a homosexual lifestyle rather
than obey the familial injunction to marry.”
It is nevertheless difficult for
them to leave since they need the authorisation of their parents
or husband to do so, according to tradition, and their family members
are likely to chase after them.
6. Reactions
by the Chechen authorities
35. In February 2017, President
Ramzan Kadyrov announced that all gay men in the Chechen Republic would
be exterminated by Ramadan (May 2017).
Following the publication of investigations
by journalists and human rights organisations, President Putin invited
Ramzan Kadyrov to the Kremlin to explain the situation on 19 April
2017. President Kadyrov said the allegations were rumours.
36. Shortly after, Mr Kadyrov’s spokesperson, Alvi Karimov, stated
the reports of an anti-gay purge were false since such men did not
exist in the Chechen Republic.
In a television interview for the
United States television Channel HBO on 14 July 2017, President
Kadyrov, asked about the purge against gay men, said: “This is nonsense.
We don’t have this kind of people here. We don’t have any gays.
If there are any, take them to Canada. Praise be to God. Take them
far from us so that we don’t have them at home. To purify our blood, if
there are any here, take them … They are devils. They are for sale,
they are not people. God damn them for what they are accusing us
of. They will have to answer to the Almighty for this”.
37. Ms Kheda Saratova, member of the Human Rights Council, which
is an advisory body to the Head of the Chechen Republic, claimed
she had seen no evidence of the alleged persecution. “In our Chechen
society, any person who respects our traditions and culture will
hunt down this kind of person without any help from authorities,
and do everything to make sure that this kind of person does not
exist in our society.”
38. The Russian LGBT Network and
Novaya
Gazeta filed a complaint with the Investigative Committee
and the Prosecutor’s General Office, and received a reply that there
was “no urgency in initiating an investigation”.
Ms Moskalkova also submitted information
to the Investigative Committee. However, the Commissioner for Human
Rights is not mentioned in the Code of Criminal Procedure and has
no authority to conduct or officially contribute to an investigation.
39. Ms Moskalkova promised however to make sure the allegations
made by Mr Lapunov were investigated and stated, “I believe there
are grounds to open a criminal case and provide State protection
to Maxim Lapunov” at the beginning of November 2017.
40. A pre-investigation check has been opened, which should normally
last for 30 days. After this period, an investigator should take
the decision whether or not to open a criminal case, and send their
decision to their supervisor. In Mr Lapunov’s case, the latter asked
for more checks and the procedure has come to a standstill. Ms Moskalkova
criticised the insufficient activity of the investigators on this
case.
No
official criminal investigation has so far progressed beyond the
pre-investigation checks.
41. In January 2018, President Ramzan Kadyrov attacked defenders
of the rights of LGBTI people. He said they “make up nonsense for
money”. “That is all an invention by foreign agents who are paid
a few kopecks. So-called human rights activists make up all sorts
of nonsense for money”, he told the BBC.
42. In April 2018, the Russian LGBT Network obtained access to
18 volumes of documentation about cases collected by the Russian
federal authorities, including a document evidencing that the authorities
had chosen not to launch a criminal case “due to the absence of
a crime having been committed”. According to Igor Kochetkov, “the
local and federal authorities tried everything not to open a case.
They have no interest in conducting an investigation … Pre-investigation
checks have been carried out by Chechen police officers, some of
which have been identified as being perpetrators”.
Testimonies of victims
are not taken seriously, since there have been public statements
denying the mere existence of LGBTI people in the Chechen Republic.
I sincerely hope a thorough, impartial and effective investigation
will be conducted at the national level. Should this not be the
case, in my opinion the Assembly should call for an independent
international inquiry to be conducted by an international human
rights organisation.
7. Calls
by the international community
43. Several heads of State and
ministers
expressed
their concern and called for an investigation by the Russian authorities,
via statements or during bilateral meetings with the Russian President
or the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs, or at press conferences.
Sigmar Gabriel, German Minister for Foreign Affairs, initiated a
letter to his counterpart Minister Sergey Lavrov, together with
foreign affairs ministers from France, the Netherlands, Sweden and
the United Kingdom, addressing the persecution of LGBTI people in
the Chechen Republic. Although it is not a priority in diplomatic
exchanges, the persecution of LGBTI people in the Chechen Republic
has not been a forgotten topic. According to Tanya Lokshina from
Human Rights Watch, the outcry was so intense that the Kremlin was
compelled to tell the Chechen authorities to stop the purge.
44. Five United Nations human rights independent experts, Mr Vitit
Muntarbhorn (Independent Expert on protection against violence and
discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity),
Mr Sètondji Roland Adjovi (Chair-Rapporteur of the Working on Arbitrary
Detention), Ms Agnes Callamard (Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial,
summary or arbitrary executions), Mr Nils Melzer (Special Rapporteur
on torture and other cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment or
punishment) and Mr David Kaye (Special Rapporteur on the promotion
and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression)
called on the Russian authorities to open an investigation. “The
arrested men are subjected to physical and verbal abuse, torture including
with electric shocks, beatings, insults and humiliations. They are
forced to give contact details of other gay people and threatened
with having their sexual orientation disclosed to their family and
community – a move which could put them at risk of ‘honour killings’.”
The Office for Democratic Institutions
and Human Rights (ODIHR) also called on the Russian authorities
to investigate reports of human rights violations against gay men
in the Chechen Republic.
45. On 16 May 2017, the European Parliament adopted a resolution
on the implementation of the Council’s LGBTI Guidelines, particularly
in relation to the persecution of (perceived) homosexual men in
Chechnya, Russia.
In
this resolution, the European Parliament expresses “its deep concern
at the reports of arbitrary detention and torture of men perceived
to be gay in the Republic of Chechnya in the Russian Federation;
calls on the authorities to end this campaign of persecution, to
immediately release those who are still illegally detained, to ensure
legal and physical protection for victims and the human rights defenders
and journalists who have worked on this case, and to allow international
human rights organisations to conduct a credible investigation into
the alleged crimes”. It also “condemns all statements by the Chechen
authorities that condone and incite violence against LGBTI people,
including the statement by the Chechen Government spokesperson denying
the existence of homosexuals in Chechnya and discrediting the report
as ‘lies and absolute disinformation’; deplores the unwillingness
of local authorities to investigate and prosecute the serious violations
directed specifically at individuals based on their sexual orientation,
and reminds the authorities that the rights to freedom of assembly,
association and expression are universal rights and apply to all;
calls for the immediate release of those who are still illegally
detained; urges the Russian authorities to provide legal and physical
protection for the victims, as well as for the human rights defenders
and journalists who have worked on this case”.
46. On the occasion of the International Day against Homophobia,
Transphobia and Biphobia (IDAHOT) 2017, the Secretary General of
the Council of Europe Thorbjørn Jagland expressed his concern “about
the recent allegations of mass persecutions of LGBTI people in the
Chechen Republic of the Russian Federation. Discrimination and violence
against LGBTI people is the worst kind of populism. Using minorities
as scapegoats is unfortunately a growing trend. It is dangerous
to democracy and governments must do all they can to stop it. Societies
based on human rights, democracy and the rule of law need strong
anti-discrimination laws, which are properly applied, and policies
to integrate minorities and protect their rights. We also need to tackle
irresponsible political dialogue inciting people to hatred and prejudice.
LGBTI people have the same rights as everyone else under the European
Convention on Human Rights, and we cannot and will not tolerate violence
and discrimination against them”.
47. Marking IDAHOT in 2018, Ms Dunja Mijatović, Council of Europe
Commissioner for Human Rights, also came back to the severe ill-treatment
and humiliation to which around 100 gay (or perceived gay) men were subjected
in Chechnya from February to April 2017.
48. Mr Jagland carried out an official visit to the Russian Federation
on 19 and 20 October 2017, during which he discussed the alleged
persecution of gay people in the Chechen Republic with Ms Tatyana Moskalkova,
Commissioner for Human Rights of the Russian Federation.
49. Several national parliaments held debates on the situation
of LGBTI people in the Chechen Republic following the publication
of the articles by
Novaya Gazeta.
Members of the
Bundestag and
the House of Commons
raised this issue with their respective
ministers for foreign affairs. Such initiatives should be praised
and further encouraged, so as to discuss possible actions to be
taken.
50. Several States
have offered protection to LGBTI
people fleeing the Chechen Republic in fear of persecution. Canada
announced it had granted asylum to 31 LGBTI people who fled the
Chechen Republic.
Several European Union countries
have followed suit and have done
their utmost to ensure the safety of the persons concerned, which
remains a serious issue. Belgium officially reported having provided
humanitarian visas to five gay men who fled the Chechen Republic.
Germany also announced it had granted
protection to LGBTI people from the Chechen Republic. Some of them
reported living in fear of retaliation, even far from the Chechen
Republic.
Specific attention should be paid
to the possible threat represented by some members of the diaspora
which might have supported the campaign of persecution against LGBTI
people.
51. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
(UNHCR) has developed specific guidelines on processing claims for
refugee status based on sexual orientation and/or gender identity,
which need to be further promoted.
These guidelines clearly define
specific persecution against LGBTI people.
52. Often, gay men hide their homosexuality and are married to
a woman in the Chechen Republic. The situation of their wives and
children after they leave the Republic is a matter of concern. Homosexuality
is a taboo topic, sometimes ignored by close relatives, including
the spouse. When invited for an interview in a consulate in Moscow,
one woman married to a gay man who had fled persecution in the Chechen
Republic, denied the fact that her husband was homosexual and was
not granted the authorisation to join him in the country where he
had fled. She could not tolerate the idea that her husband was gay,
and could not flee although she was herself victim of threats following
the departure of her husband.
53. The European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman
or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) made a visit to the Chechen
Republic from 28 November to 4 December 2017.
The CPT “looked into the investigation
of certain specific complaints/reports of unlawful detention and
ill-treatment by law-enforcement officials in the Chechen Republic”.
It
adopted its report in March 2018 and sent it to the Russian authorities
for comments. I sincerely hope the Russian authorities will authorise
its publication, which will be a positive sign showing there is
willingness to share findings by an international human rights body
on the situation in the Republic. The proposed draft resolution
includes a call for the publication of this report.
54. The adoption of the report of the European Commission against
Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) on the Russian Federation (5th monitoring
cycle) is foreseen in 2018. I sincerely hope that the Russian authorities
will fully implement all ECRI recommendations, including those concerning
LGBT people.
8. Conclusions
and recommendations
55. One year after the publication
of the findings by Novaya Gazeta,
and despite international calls, no substantive investigation has
been conducted into the wave of persecution against LGBTIs in the
Chechen Republic in 2017. Similarly, no measures have been taken
to address the overall discrimination, harassment and violence to
which LGBTI people are subjected on a daily basis. In fact, the
very existence of LGBTI people in the Chechen Republic is denied,
not only by the Chechen authorities but also more recently by the
Russian authorities.
56. Denial is not an acceptable response. An acceptable response
is that the Russian authorities conduct an impartial and effective
investigation into last year’s events and ensure there is no impunity
for perpetrators. One victim has formally lodged a complaint. This
case should be investigated through the appropriate legal and judicial
procedures. But the fact that only one person formally lodged a
complaint does not absolve the Russian authorities from opening
a broader inquiry into last year’s persecution campaign, because
of the wealth of conclusive evidence which is in the public domain,
the gravity of the crimes which are reported and the involvement
of public officials.
57. The state of relations between the Parliamentary Assembly
and the Russian Federation is far from satisfactory and this has
had an impact on my ability to obtain first-hand information as
rapporteur. Nevertheless, the Russian Federation remains a member
State of the Council of Europe and should strive to uphold human
rights. Should the Russian Federation refuse to conduct an inquiry,
it should at least allow an international independent investigation
to be conducted by an international human rights organisation.
58. There will be no change if there is no strong political signal
that the persecution of LGBTI people cannot be tolerated. Discrimination
on the grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity contradicts
the essence of equality. There is a connection between the campaign
of persecution in the Chechen Republic and the anti-propaganda legislation
in the whole of the Russian Federation, in the sense that the latter
contributes to stigmatising LGBTI people and creating a fertile
ground for hatred. I would therefore recommend that the Assembly
call again on the Russian Federation to repeal the 2013 anti-propaganda
legislation, with a view to respecting freedom of expression and
stopping discrimination. The Assembly should also call for the implementation
of relevant judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.
59. Furthermore, whereas the campaign was limited to the Chechen
Republic, the risk of spill-over exists and our reaction to this
targeted persecution might have an impact on potential similar events
in other countries. It should be made clear that there can be no
impunity for persecution against LGBTI people, regardless of the
country or the circumstances.
60. I also believe Council of Europe member States should welcome
people fleeing persecution from the Chechen Republic on the ground
of their sexual orientation and gender identity, provide them with
a safe haven and look favourably at their claims for international
protection. The protection of victims, witnesses and family members
must be a priority in handling the situation. LGBTI people who have
fled the Chechen Republic fear reprisals from the Chechen community
abroad. They need safety, protection and support, including specific psychological
support. Families of persecuted LGBTI people in the Chechen Republic
also deserve utmost attention, regardless of whether they stay or
leave.
61. I hope this report will not only contribute to shedding light
on this issue but will also call for action by all Council of Europe
member States, so as to take a stand to reaffirm that the rights
of LGBTI people are not special rights but human rights. It is our
duty not to stay silent and to try to use every opportunity we have
to reiterate our commitment to this. It is also our responsibility
to ensure that LGBTI people are not treated as second-class citizens.
62. Protecting all people from torture, degrading treatment, enforced
disappearances, arbitrary detention and ultimately extra-judicial
killings, irrespective of their origin, colour, age, gender or sexual
orientation, is one of the founding principles behind the creation
of the Council of Europe. We cannot turn a blind eye to what has happened
and might still be happening in one of the member States. We cannot
accept that people are persecuted for who they are.