See related documentsAddendum to the report
| Doc. 13082 Add.
| 22 January 2013
Towards a Council of Europe convention to combat trafficking in organs, tissues and cells of human origin
Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development
Rapporteur : Mr Bernard MARQUET,
Monaco, ALDE
Origin - Addendum approved by
the committee on 22 January 2013. 2013 - First part-session
1. Proposed amendments
to the draft recommendation
Amendment A
In the draft recommendation, paragraph 1, replace the words
“preliminary draft Council of Europe convention” with the words
“draft Council of Europe convention”.
Amendment B
In the draft recommendation, paragraph 4, replace the words
“preliminary draft convention” with the words “draft convention”.
Amendment C
In the draft recommendation, replace paragraph 5 with the
following text:
“The Assembly
underlines the utmost importance of protecting vulnerable persons,
in particular persons deprived of their liberty and persons who
are unable to give full and valid consent to an intervention for reasons
either of their age (in the case of minors) or their mental incapacity.
In this connection, it welcomes the provision in the draft convention
defining any removal of organs without the free, informed and specific
consent of the living donor as illicit. This is in line with the
provisions of the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Oviedo
Convention), which prohibit any organ removal from persons who do
not have the capacity to consent, thereby affording special protection
to that group of persons. The Assembly notes that, while it is possible
for States to reserve the right not to apply this article, such a
reservation would be accepted only in exceptional cases and in accordance
with appropriate safeguards or consent provisions under their domestic
law. The possibility of making a reservation is intended to facilitate
access to the convention for States whose legislation is less restrictive
than the principles set out in the Oviedo Convention in relation
to consent, while respecting the fundamental rights of the persons
concerned.”
Amendment D
In the draft recommendation, paragraph 7, replace the words
“, the Assembly calls for the future convention to have the broadest
possible geographical scope” with the following words:
“, the Assembly welcomes the provision
made in the draft convention for its opening to signature by States
that are not members of the Council of Europe, even prior to its
entry into force, which will foster the broadest possible geographical
scope.”
Amendment E
In the draft recommendation, paragraph 8.1, replace the words
“preliminary draft convention” with the words “draft convention”.
Amendment F
In the draft recommendation, paragraph 8.4, replace the words
“for transplantation purposes” with the words “for transplantation
or other purposes”.
Amendment G
Delete paragraph 8.5 of the draft recommendation.
Amendment H
Delete paragraph 8.6 of the draft recommendation.
Amendment I
In the draft recommendation, replace paragraph 8.7 with the
following text:
“provide for an
independent, strong and effective Committee of the Parties assigned
a clear function of co-ordination and monitoring on the basis inter
alia of reporting requirements for the Parties; while entrusting
the competent committees – the European Committee on Crime Problems
(CDPC) and the Committee on Bioethics (DH-BIO) – with a role in
supervising the convention's implementation.”
Amendment J
In the draft recommendation, after paragraph 8.8, add the
following sub-paragraph:
“call
on those member States wishing to reserve the right not to apply
the provision defining as illicit any removal of organs without
the free, informed and specific consent of the living donor to instead
revise their legislation in order to bring it into line with this
provision and the Oviedo Convention.”
2. Explanatory memorandum by Mr Marquet, rapporteur
1. On 19 November 2012, the Committee on Social Affairs,
Health and Sustainable Development adopted the report entitled “Towards
a Council of Europe convention to combat trafficking in organs,
tissues and cells of human origin”. The report and the draft recommendation
it contained were drawn up on the basis of the preliminary draft
convention against trafficking in human organs, finalised on 19
October 2012 by the Committee of Experts tasked with this activity
(PC-TO).
2. The preliminary draft convention was then examined by the
European Committee on Crime Problems (CDPC) at its plenary meeting
on 4-7 December 2012. The CDPC examined the preliminary draft article
by article and the delegations sought to reach agreement on its
provisions where a consensus had not been found at the level of
the PC-TO. On 7 December 2012, the CDPC approved the final text
of the draft convention against trafficking in human organs in the
form that will be submitted to the Committee of Ministers
.
3. The present addendum and the proposed amendments it contains
stem from the need to align the draft recommendation adopted by
our committee with the final draft convention text as approved by
the CDPC.
4. Firstly, in the draft recommendation, since the references
made to the preliminary draft convention are now obsolete, it is
proposed that they be replaced by references to the “draft convention”
(Amendments A, B and E).
5. Given that organ trafficking occurs worldwide, extending beyond
the territory of the Council of Europe's member States, the committee
had called for the broadest possible geographical scope for the
future convention. Accordingly, of the two proposals of the preliminary
draft convention as finalised by the PC-TO, the committee had proposed
recommending that the Committee of Ministers opt for the one making
provision for its opening to signature by States that are not members
of the Council of Europe, even prior to its entry into force.
Since the
CDPC has already opted for this solution in the draft convention,
the recommendation to the Committee of Ministers is no longer relevant,
hence my proposed Amendments D and H.
6. In view of the issues associated with the consent of persons
deprived of their liberty (notably prisoners), the committee had
thought it necessary that the convention include a provision prohibiting
the removal and use for transplantation purposes of organs from
these persons, whether living or deceased.
However, while organ trafficking is carried
out mainly for transplantation purposes, there is nothing to prevent
organs being trafficked for other purposes, such as research. Indeed,
article 2.1 of the draft convention stipulates that it applies to trafficking
in human organs for purposes of transplantation or other purposes.
Consequently, I think it important to supplement the recommendation
in order to prohibit all removal and subsequent use of organs from
persons deprived of their liberty (Amendment F).
7. When adopting the draft recommendation, the committee had
asked its chair to inform the CDPC that it favoured the variant
of the preliminary draft convention that included article 4.1.
a, defining as illicit any removal of
organs without the free, informed and specific consent of the living
donor or, in the case of a deceased donor, without the removal being
authorised under domestic law. In the form approved by the CDPC,
article 4 of the draft convention reads as follows:
“1. Each Party shall take the necessary
legislative and other measures to establish as a criminal offence under
its domestic law, when committed intentionally, the removal of human
organs from living or deceased donors:
a. where the removal is performed without the free, informed
and specific consent of the living or deceased donor, or, in the
case of the deceased donor, without the removal being authorised
under its domestic law …
2. Any State or the European Union may, at the time of
signature or when depositing its instrument of ratification, acceptance,
approval or accession, by a declaration addressed to the Secretary
General of the Council of Europe, declare that it reserves the right
not to apply paragraph 1.a of this article to the removal of human
organs from living donors, in exceptional cases and in accordance
with appropriate safeguards or consent provisions under its domestic
law.”
8. Our committee's wish has been granted, therefore, in respect
of article 4.1.a. This provision
is in line with the provisions of the Convention on Human Rights
and Biomedicine (ETS No. 164, “Oviedo Convention”) which prohibit
any organ removal from persons who are unable to give full and valid
consent to an intervention for reasons either of their age (in the
case of minors) or their mental incapacity, thereby affording special
protection to that group of persons.
9. Concerning the new article 4.2, which allows States to make
a reservation in respect of article 4.1.a in the
case of living donors, it should be emphasised that such a reservation
is acceptable only in exceptional cases and in accordance with appropriate
safeguards or consent provisions under the domestic law of the State
concerned. In the area of consent, the legislation of certain Council
of Europe member States is less restrictive than the principles
set out in the Oviedo Convention, permitting, in exceptional cases,
the removal of organs from minors and persons without the necessary
mental capacity, while respecting the fundamental rights of those
persons. Such legislation is in direct conflict with article 4.1.a and, were they unable to make
a reservation in respect of this article, it would quite simply
be impossible for the States concerned to accede to the convention.
For that reason, the drafters have opted for a compromise solution
aimed at facilitating access to the convention for as many States
as possible, which the Assembly should encourage, while urging member States
to revise their legislation in line with article 4.1.a and the OviedoConvention (Amendments C, G and
J).
10. Independently of the amendments made to the draft convention
text by the CDPC, I also propose, on the grounds I put forward in
the report
, that the recommendation be
reworded where implementation of the convention is concerned, so
that it better conveys the committee's message set out in paragraph
7
(Amendment
I).
11. Finally, I think it important to point out that the explanatory
memorandum of our committee’s report must be read in the light of
the amendments proposed above and bearing in mind that the draft
explanatory report to the convention is still in preparation.