Print
See related documents

Motion for a resolution | Doc. 13971 | 29 January 2016

Striking a balance between the best interest of the child and the need to keep the families together

Signatories: Mr Ben-Oni ARDELEAN, Romania, EPP/CD ; Lord Donald ANDERSON, United Kingdom, SOC ; Mr Viorel Riceard BADEA, Romania, EPP/CD ; Mr Gérard BAPT, France, SOC ; Ms Eka BESELIA, Georgia, SOC ; Ms Valentina BULIGA, Republic of Moldova, SOC ; Mr Titus CORLĂŢEAN, Romania, SOC ; Ms Aleksandra DJUROVIĆ, Serbia, EPP/CD ; Ms Josette DURRIEU, France, SOC ; Mr Cătălin Daniel FENECHIU, Romania, ALDE ; Mr Valeriu GHILETCHI, Republic of Moldova, EPP/CD ; Ms Dzhema GROZDANOVA, Bulgaria, EPP/CD ; Ms Gabriela HEINRICH, Germany, SOC ; Mr Florin IORDACHE, Romania, SOC ; Mr Tedo JAPARIDZE, Georgia, SOC ; Mr Giorgi KANDELAKI, Georgia, EPP/CD ; Mr Attila KORODI, Romania, EPP/CD ; Ms Anne-Yvonne LE DAIN, France, SOC ; Baroness Doreen MASSEY, United Kingdom, SOC ; Mr Rónán MULLEN, Ireland, EPP/CD ; Mr Andrei NEGUTA, Republic of Moldova, SOC ; Mr Zsolt NÉMETH, Hungary, EPP/CD ; Mr Pieter OMTZIGT, Netherlands, EPP/CD ; Ms Liliana PALIHOVICI, Republic of Moldova, EPP/CD ; Mr Florin Costin PÂSLARU, Romania, SOC ; Mr Bernard SABELLA, Palestine ; Mr Pavlo UNGURYAN, Ukraine, EPP/CD ; Mr Evangelos VENIZELOS, Greece, SOC

This motion has not been discussed in the Assembly and commits only those who have signed it.

The Parliamentary Assembly adopted Resolution 2049 (2015) on social services in Europe: legislation and practice of the removal of children from their families in Council of Europe member States where, inter alia, it is recommended that, except in urgent cases, initial removal decisions be based only on court orders, in order to avoid unwarranted removal decisions and to prevent biased assessments. At the same time, according to Article 9 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child “a child shall not be separated from his or her parents, against their will, except when competent authorities subject to judicial review determine, in accordance with applicable law and procedures, that such separation is necessary for the best interests of the child”.

But in some cases the best interests of the child principle is interpreted in an abusive and disproportionate manner leading to the children’s removal from their families. In this respect it is worth mentioning the case of Marius and Ruth Bodnariu, a mixed Romanian-Norwegian family living in Norway and whose children have been taken by the regional child welfare body (Barnevernet). Virtually an administrative body, based on unproven violence allegations, and whose actions are beyond any democratic oversight, took the decision to take away by force, issuing a temporary care order, their five children, one of them being a three months breastfed child. This last resort measure cannot be justified as long as no intermediate measures have been taken, such as social investigation, psychological counseling or mediation.

The significant number of cases of removal of children from their families – in 2013 out of about 53 000 cases approximately 9000 led to removal of children is a fact that indicates a systemic problem of Norwegian social services that are dealing with the children welfare, matter which should urgently be addressed by the Assembly.