Print
See related documents

Resolution 1601 (2008)

Procedural guidelines on the rights and responsibilities of the opposition in a democratic parliament

Author(s): Parliamentary Assembly

Origin - Assembly debate on 23 January 2008 (6th Sitting) (see Doc. 11465, report of the Committee on Rules of Procedure, Immunities and Institutional Affairs, rapporteur: Mr Van Overmeire). Text adopted by the Assembly on 23 January 2008 (6th Sitting).

1. “Democracy is founded on the right of everyone to take part in the management of public affairs; it therefore requires the existence of representative institutions at all levels and, in particular, a parliament in which all components of society are represented and which has the requisite powers and means to express the will of people by legislating and overseeing government action” (Universal Declaration on Democracy, Inter-Parliamentary Union, 1997). A politically representative parliament shall embody society in the diversity of its composition and shall work with due respect for the plurality of opinions.
2. The promotion and consolidation of pluralist democracy is one of the main objectives of the Council of Europe and its Parliamentary Assembly. The member states of the Organisation shall endeavour to develop common standards and practices aimed at promoting a free and pluralist parliamentary democracy and the means for their implementation in national parliaments. The democratic quality of a parliament is measured by the means available to the opposition or the parliamentary minority to accomplish its tasks.
3. A political opposition in and outside parliament is an essential component of a well-functioning democracy. One of the main functions of the opposition is to offer a reliable political alternative to the majority in power by providing other policy options for public consideration. By overseeing and criticising the work of the ruling government, continuously evaluating government action and holding the government to account the opposition works to ensure transparency of public decision and efficiency in the management of public affairs, thereby ensuring the defence of the public interest and preventing misuse and dysfunction.
4. The Assembly considers that effective follow-up should be ensured, at the level of national parliaments, to its Resolution 1547 (2007) on the state of human rights and democracy in Europe, in particular when it recalls that the right to form a political opposition shall be considered as a key element of a genuine democracy. It then recalls its Resolution 1154 (1998) on the democratic functioning of national parliaments, in which it calls on national parliaments, inter alia, to “give the opposition a status enabling it to play a responsible and constructive role …”.
5. Granting the parliamentary opposition a status according to which it is entitled to rights contributes to the effectiveness of a representative democracy and respect for political pluralism, and thereby to the citizens’ support for and confidence in the good functioning of institutions. Establishing a fair legal and procedural framework and material conditions enabling the parliamentary minority to fulfil its role is a prerequisite for the good functioning of representative democracy. Opposition members should be able to exercise their mandate in full and under at least the same conditions as those members of parliament who support the government; they shall participate in an active and effective manner in the activities of the parliament and shall enjoy the same rights. Equal treatment of members of parliament has to be ensured in all their activities and privileges.
6. The Assembly recalls that in Resolution 1547 (2007) it calls on opposition parties and their members not to ask only for rights and means, but also to show responsibility and willingness to use them and make their best efforts to enhance the efficiency of the parliament as a whole. They should not restrict themselves to merely criticising the powers in place.
7. The Assembly welcomes the fact that procedural rights of the opposition are currently of political relevance in several national parliaments. It recalls in this context the conclusions reached during the last meeting of the Council of Europe Forum for the Future of Democracy held in Stockholm/Sigtuna from 13 to 15 June 2007 regarding the role and responsibilities of the opposition. It considers that appropriate follow-up should be given to them at the level of national parliaments.
8. Differences exist in the degree of institutionalisation of the opposition in the parliaments of Council of Europe member states, ranging from informal recognition in the parliamentary rules of procedure when granting rights to the parliamentary minority to formal recognition of the opposition in the constitution of the state. However, beyond diversity of parliamentary systems in Europe, all parliaments of the member states grant rights to the parliamentary minority, whether organised around political groups or not. The Assembly notes that the notion of parliamentary opposition has undergone changes in conjunction with the modernisation of political debate. Several innovative good practices have been developed in a number of states which merit the attention of a wider audience. Therefore, the Assembly welcomes the current tendency in some parliaments to achieve full parity between the majority and the opposition concerning some rights, irrespective of the strength they have in parliament.
9. Consequently, the Assembly invites the parliaments of the member states to reform or update their rules on the rights of the opposition or parliamentary minority and encourages them to draw up a charter on the rights of the opposition, or to define the status of the opposition in parliament, taking inspiration from the guidelines below.
10. While bearing in mind the variety of parliamentary democratic institutions in Europe, the Assembly encourages the member states of the Council of Europe to start as soon as possible a genuine and thorough reflection on the modernisation of their democratic institutions and the adaptation of their parliamentary institution to the needs of a modern society. To this end, member states should take into account the guidelines set out below, as well as good practices established in the most innovative parliaments.
11. The Assembly also invites the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) to undertake a study on the role of opposition in a modern democratic society.

(open)