Print
See related documents
Recommendation 1857 (2009)
Humanitarian consequences of the war between Georgia and Russia
1. The Parliamentary
Assembly refers to its Resolution
1648 (2009) on the humanitarian consequences of the war between
Georgia and Russia.
2. It believes that there is an important role for the international
community to play in South Ossetia and Abkhazia in order to ensure
the promotion and protection of human rights and humanitarian law.
It is furthermore convinced that the Council of Europe should have
a role regarding human rights in this area, without any prejudice
to the territorial integrity of Georgia.
3. Therefore, the Assembly recommends that the Committee of Ministers:
3.1. continue to liaise with the
United Nations, the European Union, the Organization for Security
and Co-operation in Europe and other international actors;
3.2. provide support for the human rights training of members
of the European Union Monitoring Mission (EUMM);
3.3. examine with the United Nations, as a matter of urgency,
how it could contribute to the continuation of the work of a United
Nations mission in Georgia, including through a possible Council
of Europe presence, to replace the current United Nations Observer
Mission in Georgia (UNOMIG);
3.4. provide support and funding to the implementation of the
Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights’ six principles
for urgent protection of human rights and humanitarian security.
4. The Assembly also recommends that the Committee of Ministers
invite the relevant sectors of the Council of Europe to:
4.1. provide training to local authorities
and law-enforcement agents on the awareness of human rights, as
well as the specific economic, social, cultural and psychological
needs of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in line with the Committee
of Ministers Recommendation Rec(2006)6 on internally displaced persons
and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement
and in co-operation with mandated United Nations agencies and other
relevant organisations;
4.2. examine the possibility of providing training in Georgia
for government officials, at national and local level, on spending
and accounting for international aid and assistance in a transparent
manner;
4.3. provide training to non-governmental organisations on
the monitoring of aid and assistance run by the government and local
authorities;
4.4. organise a multilateral meeting for government officials
dealing with IDP issues to allow them the opportunity to learn how
these issues are dealt with in other countries;
4.5. organise a multilateral meeting for non-governmental organisations
specialising in IDP issues, to allow them the benefit of learning
from each others’ different experiences.