Traian

Băsescu

President of Romania

Speech made to the Assembly

Wednesday, 25 January 2006

Thank you very much, Mr President. Given that we have the presidency of the Committee of Ministers and that a translation from the Romanian language into the English and French languages is available, please allow me to use the Romanian language in my main speech. I will use the English language when I answer questions.

(The speaker continued in Romanian) (Interpretation) He said that it was a particular pleasure for him to address the Assembly and he thanked Mr van der Linden for the invitation. He had the honour of attending the summit of the Council of Europe in Warsaw in May 2005. He paid tribute to the Council of Europe in its service to democracy, human rights and the rule of law. It was the first completely open organisation to take into account the respect for human rights, freedom and democracy. It had played a major part in the unification of Europe. He referred to the words by Mr van der Linden: “We will not find any better, or more cost-effective, instrument to strengthen the unity of Europe based on common values, than the Council of Europe.”

In 1993, the Council of Europe had been the first organisation to recognise post-revolution Romania. In the last twelve years, the Assembly had witnessed the progress of democracy in Romania. As a result, Romania had a profound sense of attachment and duty to the Council of Europe. Both Romania and the Council of Europe had developed together and shared the European values of equal opportunities, democracy, human rights and the rule of law. Those values were the foundations of Romanian politics. He felt a moral duty, as President, to future generations to continue the long history of co-operation with the Council of Europe.

Since Romania had become a member, the government, parliament, local authorities and civil society had acted with a democratic logic to integrate the standards of the Council of Europe. They had created democratic reflexes which functioned within Romanian society. Romania had ratified 85 Council of Europe conventions and signed 21 others. That consolidation of the standards and principles of the Council of Europe had helped in the process of accession to the European Union.

The Romanian model for recognising its minorities was recognised by others as very democratic. There were now 19 national minorities represented in the Romanian Parliament, including a Magyar representative. Romania’s neighbours Serbia, Ukraine and Hungary had not yet managed to achieve a similar recognition of their minorities. He thanked the Council of Europe for its support on the issue of schools in Transnistria where Romanian teachers and pupils were still subjected to discrimination. The issue still needed greater attention from the Council of Europe. Romanian orphanages had been the subject of great concern to various European bodies. With the assistance of the Council of Europe and other parties, the Romanian Government had now taken full responsibility for the status of children in the orphanages. The children in the orphanages were now given a chance to develop within family units. The reform of local government and the judiciary was under way, as was the integration of the Roma people. Those were all lines of action that had taken place as a result of the co-operation of the Council of Europe, as part of Romania’s ambition to achieve accession to the European Union.

Progress in Moldova, in the adoption of democratic stability and regional security, was a priority for Romania. However, the conflict in Transnistria was an obstacle to achieving progress. Transnistria held enclaves of crime and was home to oligarchs who made their own rules. He noted the ruling of the International Court of Human Rights that the Romanian prisoners Ilie Ilascu, Andrei Ivantoc and Tudor Petrov-Popa had been detained arbitrarily and said that they must be released in the near future. There was a great readiness to transform the Black Sea area under the principles of partnership and democracy and he was keen to help Moldova achieve that. The basis of the democratic acquis should be a road map for Moldova similar to that created by the European Parliament for the west Balkan region.

The Council of Europe was indeed a school for democracy. The democratic acquis of the Council of Europe should be amended to include the Euro-Atlantic community. The problems of ethnic intolerance and exclusion had marked the recent conflicts in the Caucasus and the Balkans. The Council of Europe had once again confirmed its unique status by assisting countries in that region. Romania would hold the chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers and would aim for the implementation of the decisions of the Warsaw Summit. Romania counted on the support not only of all member states, but of their parliaments, governments and citizens

A security area should be created around the Black Sea to create a region of co-operation with the support of the Council of Europe, to help the democratisation of the area. Further reforms were needed at the domestic level, but there were serious challenges from the persistent conflicts in an area where international standards of law did not apply. Romania was supportive of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe’s project to create a European region of the Black Sea. During its chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers, Romania would host the launch of the project, in March. Romania had invited governments, both local and regional, officials, civil society and regional and international organisations to the launch. There should be a political declaration expressing a permanent commitment to the consolidation and promotion of democracy and good governance.

Progress in the western Balkans was all part and parcel of the Euro-Atlantic integration project. Romania would work towards a dynamic and active policy in that field. Sustainable stability had to be based on tolerant societies. Romania’s experience would be added value for European organisations during the decision-making process on the union of Serbia and Montenegro and the future of Kosovo. Reforms had to be strengthened and the rule of law and freedom of the media established. Romania recognised the role of the Council of Europe in aiming to establish democracy in Kosovo.

Romania intended to include its neighbouring countries in its proposals for the future. Romania’s European perspective had been a catalyst for reform to ensure that Romania could join the European family. He pleaded with all organisations to create a European perspective for the Black Sea area, to create a region united by democratic principles. There was a difference in terms of geographical coverage and function between the institutions of Romania and those of the European Union, but they were pursuing the same objectives. Romania’s accession to the European Union would mark the end of its transition towards democracy and the conclusion of a grand historical project. That had been made possible by the Council of Europe.

Romania had striven to accede to the European Union. It had followed the calendar drawn up for that process. Romania was now closer than ever to its objectives, not just because it had met the deadlines, but because it had shown a genuine commitment to the process. Romania had launched an unprecedented fight against corruption. The police, justice system and home affairs department had made great strides under efficient and competent leaders. The reform process had sped up because Romania had no inhibitions and was open to new ideas. Accession would be achieved by bringing together a number of historical, political and legal institutions.

He concluded by delivering a personal message of thanks to the members of the Parliamentary Assembly for their help. Many had been of great assistance with the ratification of Romania’s accession treaty. He appealed to politicians from countries where the treaty had not yet been ratified for their support. The Council of Europe had been a longstanding partner of Romania and had greatly supported its transition to democracy. He was counting on this solidarity to reach future objectives. He hoped that he would soon address the Assembly as the head of state of a member country of the European Union. He thanked the members and President and invited questions.