THE PRESIDENT
Thank you
very much, Prime Minister, for your most interesting address. Members
of the Assembly have expressed a wish to put questions to you. I
remind them that questions must be limited to thirty seconds and
no more. Colleagues should be asking questions and not making speeches.
I will allow supplementary questions only at the end and only
if time permits.
The first question is from Mr Atkinson.
Mr ATKINSON (United Kingdom)
Three
years ago, it was a pleasure for me and my co-rapporteur on Bulgaria
to recommend to this Assembly that your country had reached our
standards of democracy, human rights and the rule of law. Since
then, however, we have received complaints from minority religions
in your country of discrimination against them, and you just referred
to the new law on religion – the Confessions Act – which legitimises
that discrimination, contrary to the European Convention on Human
Rights. Will you respond to those concerns?
THE PRESIDENT
Thank you.
Mr Prime Minister, you may reply. However, the thirty seconds do
not apply to you. You may take as long as you need.
Mr Saxe-Coburg Gotha, Prime Minister of Bulgaria
It is difficult to
put it in a nutshell, but I shall try to explain the essence of
the law. It aims to guarantee the equality of all faiths in our
country. A slight reference to the Eastern Orthodox faith does not
mean that it has a preference over any other faith. It means simply
that it is a symbol of our national identity, which has to do with
our history. However, it has no priority over other faiths. In fact
we have witnessed, as have many foreign friends of Bulgaria, the
tolerance that exists and the co-operation of other faiths with
the Orthodox Church. Of course, we recently witnessed the difficulties that
can arise from inter-faith issues. In Bulgaria, a political coalition
makes up most of our government, and that is proof of the active
role of our Muslim community. In addition, people of very different
faiths have arrived in our country as refugees throughout time.
They have settled in Bulgaria and have always felt comfortable there.
I realise that that answer is quite detailed, but in some
Anglo-Saxon countries, including the United States, it must seem
strange that we regulate a faith. That is not the case, however.
We want to secure equal rights for it before any authorities or
courts. I have tried to answer that question to the best of my abilities.
Ms KOSA-KOVACS (Hungary)
Prime Minister,
according to recent research, most Roma in Bulgaria live in discriminatory
conditions. Twice as many Roma as non-Roma live in extreme poverty.
Prime Minister, what plans do you have to improve the situation
of the poor among this ethnic minority? What assistance do you expect
from the European Community?
Mr Saxe-Coburg Gotha, Prime Minister of Bulgaria (translation)
I should like to begin
by saying that I am very impressed by the active role Hungary and
its authorities are playing with respect to questions concerning Roma
minorities in Europe. I hope to have the pleasure of going to Budapest
this year to take part in a conference on the subject.
With regard to the Roma community, which is quite large, you
speak of its greater poverty. This is not quite true. It is far
from being a question of racism. It is more a socio-economic issue.
Unfortunately, you have to take into account the very high unemployment
rate in Bulgaria, for example, in the north-west of the country
where many Roma live. Because of this, they have an abnormally high
unemployment rate.
Social problems or problems of poverty, to call things by
their proper name, have to be taken into account without discriminating
against or favouring any one social or ethnic group when there are,
I regret to say, non-Roma Bulgarians in the same situation. If too
much emphasis were placed on the Roma’s problems it might produce
a backlash among non-Roma Bulgarians, so we have to keep a balance
Fortunately, we receive assistance from a number of non-governmental
organisations. They work extremely hard and are very helpful to
us in combating the scourge, if I may put it that way, of lack of
resources and unemployment within a community which – and this is
a view I share with a great many Bulgarians – gives us an additional
culture. It is a very ancient culture. The Roma are present throughout
Europe. We should accept them as they are and try to alleviate their
problems or, sometimes, take account of the fact that they are not completely
integrated, although we do have a number of programmes involving
the public and private sector.
We do not practise positive discrimination, but I should like
to inform you that we have two Roma members of parliament.
Ms PETROVA-MITEVSKA (The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia)
Distinguished Prime Minister, you plan to visit the Republic
of Macedonia in the near future. What is your opinion concerning
bilateral relations between our two nations and two states in the
economic, political and cultural spheres?
Mr Saxe-Coburg Gotha, Prime Minister of Bulgaria
I will be going soon
to “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”. May I begin on a
personal note by saying that I look forward enormously to that visit? For
the benefit of the distinguished audience before me, I might also
mention that the Republic of Bulgaria was the first country to acknowledge
and recognise “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”.
We are neighbours, as Ms Petrova-Mitevska rightly mentioned,
and we have much common history, which means that we have many common
goals. We are already trying to achieve economic co-operation, and
there is much common ground between two neighbouring countries on
sharing a common perspective that will improve our relations and
our economic interrelationship.
At certain times, it has been insinuated that there is a national
minority of Macedonians in Bulgaria. The fact of minorities and
the condition of minorities are acknowledged in the constitution
of Bulgaria. What we do not have is a legal terminology to cover
national minorities. In the 2001 census, which was extremely thorough,
some 5 071 citizens defined themselves as Bulgarians of Macedonian
origin or as Macedonians, and more than 3 000 said that Macedonian
was their mother tongue. I mention those figures simply to point
out that we have the very best understanding of that situation.
More visits by Macedonian authorities to my country and vice versa, as
well as joint diplomatic efforts by our administrations, will help
to foster good relations. That will also help to consolidate South-eastern
Europe into a normal European area, rather than a geographical entity
that has, sometimes unfairly, been branded a conflict zone.
Mr AGRAMUNT (Spain) (interpretation)
asked Mr Saxe-Coburg
Gotha what Bulgaria was doing to address the problem of corruption.
Mr Saxe-Coburg Gotha, Prime Minister of Bulgaria (interpretation)
said that Bulgaria
was addressing this problem not only at national level but at institutional
level. In the transitional years, there had been a period that had
enabled corruption to take root. Bulgaria was reducing its high
numbers of bureaucratic processes; however, it would be wrong to
say that corruption had completely taken over the country.
Mr SFYRIOU (Greece) (translation)
Prime Minister,
during its January part-session, our Assembly took a clear stance
in favour of the peaceful application of United Nations Security
Council Resolution 1441 on the Iraq crisis. Could you clarify the
very prominent position you adopted in favour of the Anglo-American
military operations?
Mr Saxe-Coburg Gotha, Prime Minister of Bulgaria (translation)
I believe there is
to be a debate here today on this very subject. Consequently, anything
I might say could not be more interesting than what will be said during
that discussion.
To return to what I was saying earlier, I should like to point
out that as a non-permanent member of the Security Council Bulgaria
worked extremely hard to avert war. We worked right up to the last
moment, so much so that we backed Mr Blair’s last attempt, with
the six points leading to a second resolution, as the last hope
and in order to exert further pressure on the Iraqi regime to try
to avoid the worst.
Of course, when we realised there was no possibility of reaching
a consensus or of preserving peace, we expressed our support, in
pectore, for the second resolution. Thus Bulgaria is, along with
some forty other countries, in the camp of those that have offered
a degree of co-operation, such as the right for mid-air refuelling
tankers to use our airspace and land at a base in Bulgaria. In addition,
a small contingent of some hundred men from chemical, bacteriological
and nuclear protection units are to be moved, probably next week, to
a country neighbouring Iraq. We do not want our soldiers to be committed
on the ground, even for humanitarian reasons.
Rather than talking about what has been done, it would be
better if all of us looked to the future so as to decide how we
can come to the aid of the Iraqi people and how a democratic system
can be supported and introduced. Not only do they deserve it, but
the international community wants to see a democratic Iraq that
is part of that community and can in this way help to find a peaceful
settlement in the Middle East.
THE PRESIDENT
Thank you.
The next question is by Mr Toshev, who is from your own country.
Mr TOSHEV (Bulgaria)
Mr Prime Minister,
I am glad to welcome you to our Assembly today. My question refers
to Resolution 1211, of 2000, and item 4.ii. This Assembly has launched
an appeal to the Bulgarian authorities to take greater account of
European standards and of the opinion of Council of Europe experts
on the draft laws that they examine. What is your commitment on
this issue, and could you approach your parliamentary faction in
this respect?
Mr Saxe-Coburg Gotha, Prime Minister of Bulgaria
You, Mr Toshev, I
and everyone else in Bulgaria know that, as with all new candidate
countries, we are being monitored to ensure that we abide by this position.
There are obviously some points that can be improved and measures
that could be implemented more quickly. However, we also know that,
in evolving from the previous totalitarian system to the current
one, many difficulties have to be overcome. This point may be valid
in relation to our laws and religious freedoms – indeed, you are
the president of our parliament’s committee on religious affairs
– which we have already mentioned.
There are also other important subjects such as the ombudsman,
which I mentioned in my opening speech. That is another element
that will help our society in being listened to by the government
more directly. There are a number of other reforms and initiatives
to which not only our party but our government is paying particular attention.
I need not tell you, Mr Toshev, but I should it point out for the
benefit of this distinguished Assembly – to which I also spoke in
Spanish a moment ago – that we have received many reports on, and
criticisms about, the issue of corruption. In considering our priorities,
we are very determined certainly to diminish that problem, if not
to eradicate it.
Mr BINDIG (Germany)
Mr President,
I had prepared a question about the social discrimination of the
Roma, but as the Prime Minister has answered a similar question
I shall withdraw mine.
Mr LLOYD (United Kingdom)
The Prime
Minister referred to the consolidation of South-eastern Europe as
a normal European area and not a war zone. You will recall, Mr Prime
Minister, the promise from the European Union and the United States
that the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe would be part of
the process of normalisation. Is your government happy with the
levels of resources and the political will put into the Stability Pact
process?
Mr Saxe-Coburg Gotha, Prime Minister of Bulgaria
Thank you, Mr Lloyd.
The Stability Pact is a project or intention that we in the Bulgarian
Government support. For some years, it has been a little less active
than we would have liked. We are aware of the size of the commitment
and the importance of fostering infrastructure projects vital to
the development of South-eastern Europe. The corridors that could
be supported by the Stability Pact are a way to accelerate our integration
and a way for western Europe to feel more comfortable when it comes
towards us. The Stability Pact needs at this stage some serious
financial investors and the participation of some of the larger
international construction companies, as well as assistance from countries
in the rest of Europe. It is a fine statement and I hope that many
of the other countries in South-eastern Europe share my view. I
was in Albania recently and I was satisfied to see how interested
they were in our work. With our Romanian neighbours, we are working
on the vital second bridge across the Danube. That will affect transport
to Greece and will be of great importance to other regions and countries.
Any support and encouragement for the work of the Stability Pact
would be most welcome.
Mr ELO (Finland)
In an earlier answer, Mr Prime Minister, you said that Bulgaria
had tried to do everything possible to avoid the military action
in Iraq. However, three months ago, Bulgaria expressed the view
at the United Nations Security Council that Resolution 1441 gave
sufficient grounds to start a military operation against Iraq. How
will that contribute to solving the crisis?
Mr Saxe-Coburg Gotha, Prime Minister of Bulgaria
The statement to which
you refer came from someone who was not specifically a recognised
spokesperson. The delegation at the United Nations supports this
view. Delving into this unfortunate crisis, one can mention Resolutions
678 and 687. However, without juggling figures and becoming pedantic
and tedious, Resolution 1472 is the most important. As I have said,
it concerns what can be done for Iraq and its people the day after
the military action is terminated.
Mr JARAB (Czech Republic)
Mr Prime
Minister, it is a great honour to have you here in this Chamber.
At a meeting of the Sub-Committee on Media of the Committee on Culture,
Science and Education this week, a reference was made to the crisis
at the Bulgarian news agency, BTA, and criticisms were voiced of
a new draft law on radio and television. My question ensues from
what we have heard about that draft media law. Is the law as drafted
something that you would like to see enforced if your party were
not in government but in opposition?
Mr Saxe-Coburg Gotha, Prime Minister of Bulgaria
Thank you. If I may
start with your last question, I would say emphatically yes.
To go back to the beginning of your question, on our news
or telegraph agency, the gentleman who headed it unfortunately decided
to hand in his resignation because he was unable, if I may say that,
to run this old, established agency, of which we are proud. The
three candidates who are now being considered are professional journalists,
which I think will help solve the crisis, as you put it. With regard
to our law on the media, it has been, for many people, too long
a process, and I must take the blame for having prolonged the preparatory
period because, having seen the enormous interest, debate and criticisms
that the new law was provoking, I asked for a special panel of journalists
and NGOs to help me and to voice their views. We eventually found
a common date, and we had a huge round table of some eighty professional
journalists and representatives of NGOs and a two and a half hour
discussion, which I found enriching and informative. The law is
approaching its implementation and adoption in parliament and debates
are still going on.
To go deeper into your question, without wanting to be too
meticulous, I could add that, within the journalistic profession,
a keen interest exists in a new, better law. People in the profession
feel that it is not proper for the general manager or director of
state television or radio to be a person who is not subject to control
and who can decide about everything in his department without being
accountable. We also want those two state companies to become more
like public institutions and less like state or government ones.
There was an interesting document in which some parliamentarians
mentioned that our government, over which I have the pleasure to
preside, is the first that has not at any moment exerted pressure
on those two vital media or sources of information. It is a complex
process but, with a professional approach and with good will on
behalf of all interested parties, we can come out with a respectable,
working law that has a long future and is not biased towards one
or other political party.
Mr HEGYI (Hungary)
My question is
similar but it is important to raise the issue once more. In the
Sub-Committee on the Media, we heard many complaints about the situation
of the media in Bulgaria. Do you agree that the public media should
be independent of both governing and opposition parties? How can
you envisage such new, independent public media being set up in
your country?
Mr Saxe-Coburg Gotha, Prime Minister of Bulgaria
Thank you for your
question. In general terms, I tried to explain to your colleague
what our views were. I am able only to emphasise my personal belief that
these institutions should be public in nature – in the interests
of the public, everyone, any party and all parties – and should
not approach the days when government radio or television were simply
propaganda instruments.
Mr RIESTER (Germany) (translation)
Two questions
have already been asked concerning anti-corruption measures in your
country. You know that this is vital for your own economic development
and also, of course, for foreign direct investment. The Council
of Europe has itself made recommendations on this subject, so I
can withdraw my question. Thank you.
Baroness HOOPER (United Kingdom)
In thanking
the Prime Minister for his presentation this afternoon, may I ask
him to expand on his government’s programme for giving equal opportunities
to women? For example, could he talk about the participation of
women in his administration at both local and national levels?
Mr Saxe-Coburg Gotha, Prime Minister of Bulgaria
I would not like to
sound in any way discriminatory by dividing the so-called “weaker”
sex from the male functionaries or employees in our administration.
As you bring it up, however, about 30% of employees in the administration,
also comprising the municipal administration, are women. In parliament,
in a house of 240 members, there are 64 women, and our party has
some 40 or more of those, so we are very lucky and particularly
well endowed with female MPs. Women therefore make up 26% of the
240 MPs.
I should add that this is not some kind of token, or something
that we are trying to implement because it is expected or trendy.
It is simply that in Bulgaria over the years women have participated
independently in many areas of life. We have three women ministers
in our Cabinet. The Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Labour and
Social Affairs is one of them, the Minister for the Environment
and Ecology is another, and the Minister for European Integration,
whom I suppose many of you have seen here, is the third.
On the whole I would say that Bulgaria is doing well. However,
this is a matter of merit; women should not be given better chances
than men. In a normal society, it is a matter of equality in every
way.
THE PRESIDENT
We must
now conclude the questions to the Prime Minister. On behalf of the
Assembly, I thank him most warmly for his statement and for the
answers that he has given to the questions.