Edward

Shevardnadze

President of Georgia

Speech made to the Assembly

Tuesday, 27 April 1999

Mr Edward SHEVARDNADZE expressed his appreciation to all representatives of the Assembly and international delegations for their unanimous support for Georgia’s admission as a member of the Council of Europe. He thanked the Council of Europe for its commitment to democracy. In its fifty years the Council of Europe had made a remarkable contribution to the promotion of human values. The Council of Europe had been established to help Europe recover after the second world war but, with the cold war, the idea of a family of nations was doomed, with eastern Europe being isolated behind the Iron Curtain. Following the defeat of fascism, the end of the cold war was the second most significant recent European development and provided the opportunity for progress which was epitomised in the Council of Europe. The end of the cold war allowed a number of countries to take their rightful place in the family of Europe.

Georgia’s admission into the Council of Europe was an important prerequisite towards fulfilling its internal objectives. A society based on the rule of law and a market economy was wanted. Georgia had adopted a new constitution, including free elections and a constitutional court. It was important to note that the reforms had created an institutional respect for human rights. New civil codes had been adopted. Capital punishment had been abolished and an ombudsman established.

A tidal wave of change was sweeping through Georgia. Residents’ permits had been abolished and an environment had been created for an independent mass media. Legal standards had been harmonised with those in Council of Europe countries. Georgia had already acceded to a number of conventions and in 1999 a co-operation programme had been agreed between the Council of Europe and Georgia in the areas of the law and human rights. Co-operation in the fight against corruption was of crucial importance to Georgia. Georgia had created a special enforcement agency to fight corruption. Judicial reform was also under way to ensure that Georgia could gain its rightful place in the Council of Europe.

Georgia also had a role in developing relations and encouraging respect for human rights throughout the south Caucasus. He hoped that in the near future both Armenia and Azerbaijan would become full members of the Council of Europe. The objectives and values of the Council of Europe should be more comprehensively defined to enable countries to make the transition to democracy.

The ethnic cleansing in Kosovo had proved as disastrous as that as in Abkhazia. In Abkhazia over 300 000 people, mostly Georgian, had been driven out and thousands executed. Such widespread low-intensity local conflicts could trigger chain reactions, which could lead to a global confrontation, but international organisations still responded with rhetoric and watered-down resolutions. A new European order could not be created unless each country received equal attention and effort. Kosovo should not be regarded as an isolated event.

A peace process under the auspices of the United Nations would be the best way to solve the problem of Abkhazia. Georgia felt that Abkhazia should accept a place in a federation where the rights of all groups would be respected.

Mr Shevardnadze had just come to Strasbourg from Washington DC. Despite having left behind two world wars and the cold war, the future was not cloudless. Instincts for the recognition of threats had slackened and there were dangers present in making tepid responses in the face of threats to human rights. Nazi crimes, though of a different scale, had shown the tragic results which could ensue. Nor had Bolshevik crimes received a proper assessment. In the past, whole villages and nations had been “ethnically cleansed” in parts of eastern Europe. If peace talks were misused, for example by endless procrastination aimed at allowing crimes to become legitimised, they would be discredited. In general, diplomacy had to be backed by force.

Occupancy of the moral high ground should not be compromised by geopolitical considerations. A partnership was needed involving the European and Atlantic community. The Black Sea Co-operation, initiated by Turkey in 1992, provided a good example of an international organisation of growing weight. A potential belt of peace, the new Silk Route, was coming into being as a result of co-operation between the Black Sea and Caspian sea countries. Oil and gas transportation infrastructures were either complete or under construction. Georgia was at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, and was a partner of proven reliability. Reforms were continuing and, despite an acute energy crisis, industry and agriculture were being revitalised. Georgia had an affinity with European culture and had acceded to the European Cultural Convention in part with the aim of improving understanding of its cultural potential. This was one area in which Georgia was active in the Council of Europe.

He endorsed the creation of favourable conditions for human justice and supported the idea that the Council of Europe and the Committee of Wise Persons had proposed concerning self-renewal. The Council of Europe was vital for small states which, via the Assembly, could contribute to the world stage. He continued to be incurably optimistic about the creation of a new European order in the twenty-first century.