The PRESIDENT
Thank you
Mr President for your characteristically forthright and amusing
address, and for your kind invitation to your next address. Members
of the Assembly have questions to put to you.
I remind colleagues that questions must be limited to 30 seconds
and must be questions and not statements. We go first to the political
groups. I call Mr Vareikis on behalf of the Group of the European
People’s Party.
Mr VAREIKIS (Lithuania), spokesperson
for the Group of the European People’s Party
Mr President,
you probably know that, for those in this Chamber, the most lovely
and honourable Czech person is Václav Havel. We regard Václav Havel
as a man who represents high moral standards in politics. So who,
in your opinion, is the better candidate for the Václav Havel prize
– the person who imposed sanctions for morality or the person who
is lifting sanctions for business interest?
Mr Zeman, President of the Czech Republic
I forgot to issue an early warning. I almost do not hear –
a great advantage for any politician – so speak slowly and loudly.
But still, with the help of my friend, yes, I understand you well.
Václav Havel has been, and still is, the symbol of moral policy.
If you compare moral policy with so-called realpolitik – a German
term – you are sometimes unhappy that moral policy has nearly no
success. But still, deep in my heart, I believe, even if I support
the economic interest, that without protection of human rights, any
business is only a short-term one. Václav Havel is still a very
prestigious person. I know that his statue is here, but it is also
in the capital of Washington. He will be for a very long time the
symbol of velvet revolution – a revolution without blood and without
violence.
Lord ANDERSON (United Kingdom), spokesperson
for the Socialist Group
Mr President, on sanctions, recall
that we are not the European Union; we are not NATO: we are a human
rights Organisation. Our Russian colleagues have chosen to absent
themselves from this Assembly. The Russian Federation has chosen
to downgrade the European Court of Human Rights in favour of its
constitutional court. As an observer of the Russian Federation,
do you see any prospect of improvement in human rights in that country?
Mr Zeman, President of the Czech Republic
We have discussed with some functionaries of the European Council
the impact of the Russian Federation rejecting the provision of
money for the budget of this Organisation. Well, if you have no
Russian representatives in this Assembly, why pay money for the Organisation
in which you do not participate? That is a very simple question.
I may apply my disagreement with any sanctions, and also disagreement
with financial sanctions from the side of the Russian Federation.
It is, they tell me, approximately 10% of the total budget – an
enormous amount of money, of course. But if you want to change the
attitudes of any human person or any State, it must be present in
the dialogue. If it is excluded from the dialogue, then, as Talleyrand
said, “It is worse than a crime, it is a mistake.”
Mr GONCHARENKO (Ukraine), spokesperson
for the European Conservatives Group
Mr President,
let me give my personal reaction to what I have heard from you.
I want to remind you that there was an aggressor in the 1930s in
Europe, there were attempts to pacify him, the result was a great
war, and one of the first victims of this war was your homeland.
The question from our group is about the annexation of Crimea. What
should be done by the Council of Europe and the international community
to make the Russian Federation stop its repressive policy and deterioration
of the human rights situation in Crimea?
Mr Zeman, President of the Czech Republic
A wonderful, wonderful idea, but the political world is full
of wonderful ideas. Some of them are even in the political cemetery.
I will quote a former German president, Mr Gauck, who said publicly
in Prague, “If we try to take Crimea again and return it to Ukraine,
it would mean European war.” I only quote it – nothing more. So
do you want to risk a European war? Crimea is an act, without any
doubt. Crimea is at the same time a fait accompli. In response to
the second part of your question, what are we to do? Well, if there
was a dialogue between the Russian Federation and Ukraine, I think
– it is only my personal view – that there would possibly be some
compensation for Crimea in financial form or in a natural form,
by which I mean oil or gas. This is only my personal proposal –
nothing more. We respect that we try to avoid European war and at
the same time we try to compensate Ukraine.
Ms FIALA (Switzerland), spokesperson
for the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe
Dear Mr President,
on behalf of my Committee on Migration, Refugees and Displaced Persons,
and as a Liberal, I thank you from the bottom of my heart for the
international conference held in Prague last week. Immigration detention
of children is coming to an end under your chairmanship of the Committee
of Ministers with the legislative changes foreseen after the fruitful
symposium in your country.
Mr Zeman, President of the Czech Republic
The migration problem is one dividing line I did not mention. There
is, as you know, a dividing line between the Visegrád group and
the rest of the European Union. The Visegrád group is strictly against
illegal economic migration, for many reasons – there is no time
to repeat them. As a reasonable solution, we must help migrants
in their domestic countries. That means that from the national budgets
of European countries it is necessary to finance, for instance,
electricity, schools, hospitals, water resources and so on – but,
I repeat, in domestic countries of those migrants, not in European
countries.
Let me add one argument more. I do not speak about fresh working
forces and so on, but basically the European Union has 8% unemployment.
There is a brain drain. If young, healthy men leave their homeland, they
weaken its economy. The brain drain, which is sometimes a muscle
drain, may condemn such countries to permanent backwardness, because
they lose an important part of their workforce – perhaps even millions of
people – which is also my argument against illegal and economic
migration. I have nothing against refugees who have been persecuted
for political reasons in their own country. They are not illegal
migrants or economic migrants.
Mr KOX (Netherlands), spokesperson
for the Group of the Unified European Left
You spoke
relevant words about the inadequacy of sanctions in Europe and the
need to overcome the confrontation in Europe but, more concretely,
what would be your road map to get the European Union and the Russian
Federation away from this dangerous confrontation and towards a
better co-existence on this continent? To say only that sanctions do
not work is not enough. What is your road map to overcome these
difficulties?
Mr Zeman, President of the Czech Republic
I will try to respond frankly. It is about people-to-people communication.
Let us organise workshops, seminars, conferences and so on, so that
we can see the ideological diversion. I talk to Russian people,
and they are not illiterate or uneducated. They are able to hear and
they have their own arguments, and we must be able to hear those
arguments, too. The founder of my State, Tomáš Masaryk, said, “Democracy
is discussion.” Let us discuss.
Ms FILIPOVSKI (Serbia), spokesperson
for the Free Democrats Group
Mr President, how do
you see the situation between Catalonia and Spain? Many European
countries have different points of view on the immigration crisis
over the past four years. Do you believe it is possible to reach
a comprehensive solution? What is your understanding of the political
double standards in the Council of Europe?
Mr Zeman, President of the Czech Republic
There is perhaps a tendency towards the regionalisation of Europe.
It is not a good tendency that we do not evaluate our personal values.
There should be real processes, because it is not only Catalonia;
it is also Scotland. A referendum on Scottish independence has been
declared for the next year, as far as I know.
I have mentioned Crimea, and there is also the problem of
Kosovo. The independence of Kosovo was not a reasonable solution
because it was against the United Nations resolution on the territorial
integrity of Serbia. One standard is being applied to Kosovo and
another, opposite, standard is being applied to Crimea.
The PRESIDENT
We have
time for a very few questions from the floor. I call Ms Duranton.
Ms DURANTON (France) (interpretation)
There have been
sometimes violent demonstrations in Prague about migrants and immigrants.
What is the Czech Republic doing about such hate speech?
Mr Zeman, President of the Czech Republic
There have been demonstrations in Prague both for and against
migrants, although the demonstrations against migrants may be bigger.
It is a little paradoxical, because the territory of Czechia, including
Prague, has no migrants at all – from the Czech point of view, migrants
are like the Yeti or Madame Columbo – but we know there are plenty
of migrants in Austria, Germany and elsewhere, hence the demonstrations
against migrants. Some political representatives say there is no reason
to apply the European policy of relocation, and they recommend,
as I have recommended, helping people in their own territory.
It would not be democratic to stop these demonstrations. In
a recent year, and at the same place, there was one demonstration
against me and one demonstration in my favour. I participated in
both, because I am a democrat.
Ms HOVHANNISYAN (Armenia)
Mr President,
I acknowledge your personal input in raising awareness of the Armenian
genocide. Human rights education is among the priorities of the
Czech chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers. It is imperative
to include crimes against humanity as a topic within school curriculums. Is
the level of education on crimes against humanity sufficient in
Europe? What can the Council of Europe do to support the integration
of this topic in the curriculums of member States?
Mr Zeman, President of the Czech Republic
That is a complex question. The level of international crime
is growing because of Islamic terrorism. I am open and frank, and
I do not use the phrase “Islamic terrorism” lightly but, in the
overwhelming majority of cases, it has Islamic origin. It is connected
with genocide in Armenia. Yes, I was heavily criticised when I declared
the same thing as France did, for instance, but as the Assembly knows,
the French Parliament even adopted a law about that genocide. On
the other side, I have been criticised for having a good economic
relationship with Azerbaijan. I am probably Jekyll and Hyde, but
nobody knows who is Jekyll and who is Hyde.
What can we do against international criminality? Invest in
the police and the army, and have the courage to invest in our own
guns. My wife also has a pistol. Of course she passed all necessary
tests, but now I am guarded by my wife, and not only by bodyguards.
The second amendment to the American constitution says that everybody
has the right to have a weapon – of course they must fulfil the
necessary conditions and tests. We Europeans are a little more careful
than the Americans, but after Barcelona and many assassinations,
I think that the difference between Europeans and Americans is not
so great.
Mr HOWELL (United Kingdom)
Mr President,
I want to take you outside Europe for a moment. What can you do,
and what can we do, to bring peace to the Middle East?
Mr Zeman, President of the Czech Republic
My response will probably be a deep disappointment to you.
I am a friend of Israel – a deep friend of Israel. That is why I
think that peace in the Middle East should be based primarily in
the safety of Israel. I know the history of all the wars starting
from 1948. Israel was victorious in every war, but had it been defeated
it would have meant the end of that State – the Jewish State. Unfortunately, in
some countries or movements – Hezbollah, Hamas, and others – there
survives a tendency to diminish or to destroy Israel. What should
we do to have peace in the Middle East? We must disarm the terrorist organisation,
and first of all Hamas and Hezbollah.
The PRESIDENT
Thank you,
Mr President. Sadly, that concludes the speakers whom I am able
to accommodate because of time and the President’s commitments.
Thank you, Mr President, for this exchange of views. In concluding
your speech you emphasised one of the core ideas at the heart of
the Council of Europe, which is to build friendship between European
nations. For me and, I hope, for all of us, friendship means unity,
shared values, honesty and, above all, respect. The Council of Europe
is what it is today – a common legal space and a human rights protection
system that stretches from the Atlantic to the Pacific – because
47 European nations have voluntarily committed themselves to respect
a common set of standards. All the Council of Europe’s 47 member
States must respect that commitment for there to be that unity,
mutual trust and friendship. The Assembly offers a platform for contacts
and exchanges between Europe’s politicians, and it will continue
to work hard to achieve that goal. I thank you warmly, Mr President,
for the contribution to that process that we have received from
you today.
Mr Zeman, President of the Czech Republic
Let me add my sincerest thanks to my friend sitting beside
me who was an amplifier of your totally unheard questions. Thank
you, Rudolph, and thank you all. See you not in the next century,
but in the next decade. Bye, bye.
The PRESIDENT
There are
a few housekeeping announcements before we leave. The third ballot
for the election of the President will close in two minutes at 1
p.m. Anybody who has not voted has a fast run to the back of the
President’s chair to vote. Would the tellers please make their way
to the room behind the President’s chair in order to start counting
the votes the moment the ballot closes at 1 o’clock?
The ballot for electing the judge in respect of Georgia to
the European Court of Human Rights is suspended, but not closed,
until the afternoon’s sitting. Voting will reopen at 3.30 p.m. and
close at 5 p.m. As I indicated, we hope to announce that result
later this afternoon.