The PRESIDENT (interpretation)
Thank you
very much, President, for your speech, which was of great interest
to the members of our Assembly. A large number of colleagues have
expressed their desire to put questions to you. I remind members
that questions must last only 30 seconds, not more, and that they
must ask a question, not make a speech.
The first question is by Mr Vareikis on behalf of the Group
of the European People’s Party.
Mr VAREIKIS (Lithuania), spokesperson
for the Group of the European People’s Party
Mr President,
people of my generation remember that, during the Cold War, Finland
was the place where West met East. The Helsinki process was very
important in ensuring world peace. We are now talking about a new
Cold War. Perhaps it is time for Finland again to start global diplomatic
efforts for world peace.
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
Many people now say that we face similar circumstances to
those that we saw during the decades of the Cold War. Someone has
even said that we face an ice-cold war. Finland appreciates and
respects dialogue, and we are trying to enhance that all the time.
Last week, I had the opportunity to meet President Xi of China,
and I have also met President Trump and President Putin recently. The
world order has changed. I mention those three gentlemen, but we
others – 7 billion of us – depend on what they think and how they
handle their policies. However, those others can also have an influence
through dialogue – by telling them what we think, and hoping we
return fully to a rules-based order, which has been beneficial for
every human being – including in this Parliamentary Assembly, every
time you meet.
Mr ÇEVİKÖZ (Turkey), Spokesperson
for the Socialists, Democrats and Greens Group
Finland
is a direct neighbour of Russia, and the two have good neighbourly
relations. Do you think you have an opportunity to contribute to
the resolution of the current crisis in relations between the Council
of Europe and Russia? Soon after Finland leaves the Chair of the
Committee of Ministers in the Council of Europe it will take the
presidency of the European Union. In view of this double role, what
are your plans to develop co-ordination between the two organisations?
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
Yes, we have a big neighbour, and I have already said that
we want to have dialogue. Finland also has a dialogue, as I do personally,
with the Ukrainian President Poroshenko. There is only one aim for
Finland: trying to have a dialogue and thus enhancing the peace,
which is most important for all of us.
We also chair the Arctic Council at the moment, so this is
a year of three presidencies for Finland. The visit of our Foreign
Minister yesterday and my visit today has opened our eyes to the
fact that the Council of Europe and the European Union have a lot
in common. Like you said, we are a player now, with our presidency
of the European Union starting mid-year. This is a good lesson for
us, too. Your idea about trying to enhance co-operation between
the institutions is a good one that I gladly support.
Lord BALFE (United Kingdom), Spokesperson
for the European Conservatives Group
Mr President,
you referred to the three presidencies. I notice that Japan, China,
India and Korea have had observer status at the Arctic Council since
2013. However, the application of the European Union has been deferred
since then, and it appears that the Council of Europe has never
applied. Do you see a more tied-in role for the Council of Europe
and the European Union at the Arctic Council in future?
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
I have said many times that, if we lose the Arctic, we lose
the globe. How we protect the Arctic is vital. There are historical
and geographical reasons why the Arctic Council has only eight permanent
members. We have observers, as you said, and we have noticed a lot
of increasing interest in becoming an observer, from the very South
to the very North. On the European Union’s observer status, that
was tabled a long time ago and has been discussed year after year.
We might try it again someday. However, we are all aware that Russia
has vetoed it. As long as that is the situation, it is difficult
to go further. Let us put it this way: I fully agree with you.
Mr BILDARRATZ (Spain), Spokesperson
for the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe) (interpretation)
Thank
you, Mr President. This morning, you addressed two very important
concepts.
(The speaker continued in English)
First, preventing radicalisation, and secondly, developing
inclusion. What is the role of education in Finland in preventing
radicalisation, and what role does universal basic income play in
developing inclusion in Finland?
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
In Finland we face a problem – specifically with young boys
– where they somehow fall out of society. What we have been thinking
and doing about that and about the radicalisation of youngsters
fits together. The key is that everyone, especially young people,
should feel that they are part of society. When people feel a part
of society, they behave in a decent way. How do we make youngsters
feel that? Education is surely one way, and so are financial solutions
to help them.
I have also pointed out the responsibility of each individual.
I suddenly remember words from here or there from when I was a youngster,
such as somebody saying to me “Don’t do that again” or “Now you’ve
made it fine”. Such reactions from people near to us either bring
us in or take us out of society. I think everybody will have similar
experiences from their youth. It is very odd, actually, how one
sentence from a total stranger can still come into our minds after
decades. Why? Because it had an impact. We all have an impact on
each other.
Mr KOX (Netherlands), Spokesperson
for the Group of the Unified European Left
Mr President,
I fully support your call to recognise it as the shared responsibility
of the Parliamentary Assembly and the Committee of Ministers to
overcome our internal problems, which have persisted for too long
and have cost this Organisation and especially our citizens too
much. We are happy that the Finnish presidency is now leading this
process, but what role could you play as head of State of Finland,
an honest broker country? More concretely, will you meet President
Putin, or have you already met, to make it clear that there is also
a shared responsibility on the Russian side to overcome this problem
and that it is also in the interests of the Russian side to be part
and parcel of this Organisation and to live up to their obligations,
in the interests of the citizens of our biggest member State?
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
As I said, I have been in discussions with both President Poroshenko
and President Putin, including about the Council of Europe and the
current situation. I hope to be able to try to enhance that dialogue
so as to enable us at the end to find a common solution. Surely
it is not in my hands; it is more in your hands. However, I have
said today to Madam President and the Secretary General that if
it is needed, or if they think it would be useful, I am always there,
trying to help.
Ms PASHAYEVA (Azerbaijan), Spokesperson
for the Free Democrats Group
Threats to the future
of Europe such as populism, Islamophobia and anti-Semitism are obviously
serious concerns. Are combating these negative tendencies and strengthening
dialogue between cultures and civilizations among your priorities
as the President of Finland heading the Committee of Ministers?
My second question relates to refugees. Do you consider the activities
of European countries and institutions to be adequate to the increasing
refugee problem in Europe, which is the result of conflicts and
wars, and what further steps should be taken?
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
If we find populism or new kinds of opposition arising in
different countries, we cannot just say, “Well, they are wrong.”
We also have to look in the mirror. Have we done something wrong
that has raised these kinds of feelings? Trying to find the answers
is a very difficult task.
I think the situation in many countries is similar to that
in Finland. If I compare the situation now with 30 years ago, I
see that almost everything is better for ordinary people, but I
am not sure that people are more satisfied than they were at the
beginning of this era. We should also bear in mind that we human
beings are such that we get used to good things, and we also get
used to demanding more good things. That makes politics more and
more difficult, and maybe it makes populism easier and easier.
One of the new elements we face is social media, but somehow
I am optimistic. As we can all see, sometimes it is very aggressive
and not necessarily truthful, but I am optimistic. I somehow feel
that this trend will pass. People get bored when they keep seeing
things that make them think, “Well, that really wasn’t quite true”
or “That was throwing the ball too far.” I am a strong believer
in democracy. To refer to the Finnish experience again, we have
had two periods, the first in the ’70s and the second just 10 years
ago, when a new party made big gains, and we called them populists.
Both of them, in the ’70s and now, ended up with governmental responsibility
and they changed – they vanished also. We have to think carefully
about these kinds of elements. If we say to some of these movements,
“You’re totally wrong. Get out. Shut your mouth,” that does not
work and often only generates more criticism.
On the question of refugees, I would repeat what I said. The
migration problem is specific to the European Union area, and the
European Union has to take a leading role in how people get into
Europe, how we interpret asylum legislation and, if at the end there
are people who are not entitled to stay, how we return them together. If
different European Union members create their own systems, I am
afraid that we will end up with chaos.
Mr FOURNIER (France) (interpretation)
On 10 December
last year, we celebrated the 70th anniversary of the signature in Paris
of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This text is today
identified as a common achievement of humanity, but it is not at
all certain that it would be accepted today. That is something that
was recently said by the German Chancellor, and I very much fear
that she was right. I would like to hear your view on this issue and,
in particular, on the calling into question of the universal character
of human rights that we are alas witnessing today.
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
I have not seen the comments of the German Chancellor. Surely times
have changed, and it is indeed possible that if there were a new
round or a totally new situation, we should make an agreement like
the one that we did. The context might be a bit different, because
we are facing different times and different phenomena, but basically,
as I have said, I am a strong believer in a rules-based order and,
in the end, I think it would very much be possible to end up with
an almost similar convention.
Mr HUSEYNOV (Azerbaijan)
Azerbaijani-Finnish
trade turnover is steadily growing, and today 13 Finnish companies
are registered in the fields of industry, trade, services and construction
in Azerbaijan. How do you see the prospects for economic relations
between our countries? Secondly, when the OSCE Minsk Group was established
in 1992, Finland was chosen as a co-chair in finding a solution
to the Nagorno-Karabakh problem. You retain your place in the Minsk
Group today. What new efforts can we expect from you towards finding
a solution to what is a critical problem for Azerbaijan?
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
I think Finnish industry will be very happy that you have
given me the chance to tell you about everything it can offer. We
all face the phenomenon of urbanisation, which is a huge challenge.
In Finland, many companies are co-operating on how to solve the
problems of urbanisation, such as wastewater, access to clean water
and traffic. We need a lot more of this kind of thinking. We know that
people tend to move to cities but it is a huge environmental challenge,
which we must try to clear up.
Turning to Minsk, Finland fully supports the ongoing process.
I understand that there is a bit more optimism at the moment. We
hope that there will be a solution; surely Azerbaijan and Armenia
are the key players in what will happen.
Mr HOWELL (United Kingdom)
Mr President,
I understand exactly what you said about migration but the press
also reports that Finland is looking to revise its immigration treaties.
Could you tell us where immigration policy in Finland is going?
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
I am not aware that Finland is changing its treaties. I am
aware, however, that Finland is going through the existing treaties
and how they are interpreted. One example is the Dublin Agreement,
of which we still hear two different interpretations. We should
be clear about what the international agreements and conventions
demand and what they do not expect from signatories. This is the work
we are doing. I do not believe that there will be any huge change
in Finnish migration policy. The problem, however, is that we received
quite a lot of young men who were not entitled to refugee status
but are not leaving the country. That is a dangerous situation for
them and for others. Feeling yourself to be, in a way, empty is
not good for a young boy.
Mr TILKI (Hungary)
Mr President,
I would like to ask another question about migration. It is a very
serious problem and there are a lot of asylum seekers in Finland
who pose a security risk, burden the social security system and
create pull factors for further migrants. What kind of solution
does Finland apply?
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
As I said, it is quite a difficult situation. If you have
people staying in your country illegally, which is their situation
if they do not have refugee status, it is difficult to give any
good answer to that question. You cannot treat people, even if they
are staying illegally, in a way that does not follow human demands.
That is why all the countries in the European Union face the same
problem. Thus, it is most important that the European Union should
take a leading role so that we do not see country-by-country solutions,
which are not always the best ones possible.
Mr KITEV (“The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”)
Given that I come from a Western Balkan region that has been
at the centre of the international community’s attention for the
past decade in terms of Euro-Atlantic integration, I would like
to ask: what is Finland’s position on the enlargement of the European
Union? It is a topic that remains high on the agenda of the European
institutions. Does Finland support these processes, which are very
important, particularly for my country and the wider region?
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
Finland has been supportive of enlargement. The last major enlargement
wave was decided in 1999 in Helsinki during the Finnish presidency.
However, we must also recognise that the European Union has quite
a lot of problems at the moment. There is European monetary union
and financial problems. The global importance of the European Union
has been declining. Why? My explanation is that it is because we
have difficulty in agreeing and making compromises to find a clear
path. That also damages the possibility of our having a place at
the global table, which we should have.
I think the European Union needs to improve a lot. During
its presidency I want Finland to take this question back to the
table: where is the European spirit? I felt it in the 1990s when
Finland joined the European Union, but I am not sure that I feel
it in totally the same way today. We should find it again. That
would also give rise to the possibility of enlargement. But enlarging
something that needs fixing is a kind of paradox.
Earl of DUNDEE (United Kingdom)
Mr President,
considering the correct priority given to education for the future
of democracy and human rights, and taking into account the excellent
standards already set by Finland’s education system – now recognised
by the OECD’s PISA measure as the best in Europe – what plans do
you have to help improve education systems elsewhere, not least
this year in connection with your country’s current chairmanship
of the Council of Europe and your imminent chairmanship of the European
Union?
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
Let me start with a couple of words about our success story.
Some say that you have to use a lot of resources for this, but our
educational budget is average among those of OECD countries, so
this is not achieved by money. Our teachers do have a university
education, unlike the position in many other countries, but the
basic element here is totally different – it is respect. I am talking
about respect for education and respect for teachers. If you have
pupils who clearly respect education and the teacher, who has given
them knowledge and information, that makes for the best result.
You ask how we can export that. We have created a clear combination
as to how we can export “the Finnish education” to different countries,
and it is being exported quite lot. However, my answer still is
that this lies in attitudes. You have to respect what you do, as
then you do it well.
Mr Espen Barth EIDE
Norway
Mr President, I flew in yesterday from the deep Arctic, from
Tromsø and the Arctic Frontiers conference, so I was happy that
you mentioned the Arctic. One topic we discussed there was the fact
that an institution that was built in better times, the Arctic Council,
is working well, to a large degree unaffected by the difficult east-west relations
we are seeing elsewhere; credit should also go to the chairmanship.
I wonder whether one reason for that is that the Arctic Council
has been able to focus on its core purpose and its core issues.
Do you think the Council of Europe has a lesson to learn from that
experience?
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
Yes. We planned to have an Arctic Summit, the first ever where
the heads of State could meet, This was going well until something
happened and it now seems that we are not able to arrange it. As
for the Arctic area, one explanation for what is happening is surely
that the surroundings are cool enough not to have hot talks. This
is being tested now, because of the environmental element; the melting
of the ice is dangerous for the whole globe. However, huge economic
interests are involved, and how these eight Arctic countries can
handle and combine them is a test now. So far, as you said, we have
not seen any major problems, and it seems that the big members –
the United States and Russia – are both trying not to bring to that
table issues that raise only problems. That is a good attitude to
have. As I said, the two elements of the environment and the economic
interests may create a new and testing situation.
Ms GURMAI (Hungary)
The priorities
of the Finnish presidency include the protection of human rights
and gender equality. You also want to pay particular attention to
the ratification of the Istanbul Convention – the convention on
preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence.
I am the rapporteur on this, so I would love to know what to do.
What can you suggest to those national parliaments that refuse even
to negotiate in respect of the convention. Onnea! Good luck!
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
Kiitos. Thank you. That was wonderful Finnish spoken. As I
said in my speech, in Finland we have a lot to give thanks for on
equality. Finland was the first country in the world to give full
political rights to women. This is key to our success story, and
I hope that all nations find out the same truth. I also mentioned
the HeForShe movement, which is led by United Nations women; and
we talk specifically about Africa. We Europeans – this is more for
the European Union – must do concrete things together. All the EU
countries must do things together, with a clear plan of how to enhance
the position of women and girls in Africa. That would help us a
lot in the future. My answer has to be that eyes have to be opened
to understanding that it is to our benefit if women are strong –
we all benefit from that. Sometimes you have to be “selfish” and
give possibilities to others in order to help yourself.
Mr JALLOW (Sweden)
We have seen,
and continue to witness, the rise of fascism and nationalism in Europe.
These people have not only occupied our public space, marching through
our streets and intimidating others, but occupied our corridors
of power and institutions of policymaking. This is highly relevant
in Finland, as in December 2017 a court in Finland banned a neo-Nazi
group called the Nordic Resistance Movement. My question is: what
do you intend to do, now that you have the presidency of this great
institution, to defend our core democratic values from these racist
and fascist terrorists who are taking over Europe?
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
We can have but just one opinion: racism is totally wrong.
That has been written down in our conventions and it is a guideline
for every covenant. On Nazism, you mentioned the Finnish experience
of having flags. I want to tell you that the police took them off
these people quite quickly and they will continue taking them off
them. The problem with those movements is how to respond legally
to them. In a modern society it is difficult to ban certain groups,
especially if they are not legally organised; you do not know who
they are. But the position must be very clear: you have to react
to everything that is not in accordance with legislation. I am sure
that that is the Finnish answer, against both racism and Nazism.
The PRESIDENT (interpretation)
Thank you.
The last speaker on my list is Mr Fassino.
Mr FASSINO (Italy) (interpretation)
I will be brief.
You were right to emphasise that the Council of Europe is faced
with the serious political problem of Russia’s membership. It is
a sensitive and vexed issue. We are all aware that if Russia were
to leave the Council of Europe, it would change the very nature
and identity of the Organisation. Finland has had complex relations
with Russia. How does the Finnish chairmanship see the issue and
how can it help?
Mr Niinistö, President of Finland
We are helping in every possible way, especially where you
see that we can or should do something. In the end, I underline
that it is in the hands of the Council of Europe; the Committee
of Ministers and the Assembly have to work together to try to find
an answer. By all means, however, we will be as helpful as we can
be. We will try to help with whatever is needed.
You rightly mention that even the nature of the institution
might change. I am worried not only about Russia’s membership of
the Council of Europe, which is surely important, but that it is
the only institutional link between Europe and Russia. If even that
is cut away, how can we continue the dialogue?
The PRESIDENT (interpretation)
That brings
to an end the questions that members wish to put to you, President.
I thank you very much for your address and for replying to questions.