1. Introduction
1. In July 2006, I presented a
motion for a resolution on the subject of “the role of women in
modern societies, including in intercultural and inter-religious
dialogue” together with a number of colleagues. The motion was referred
to the committee for report, and I was appointed rapporteur in December
2006 (the Committee on Culture, Science and Education will prepare
an opinion, for which the rapporteur is Mr Pollozhani, a member
of the European Democrat Group from “the former Yugoslav Republic
of Macedonia”).
2. Since my appointment as rapporteur, I have consulted some
Latvian and international experts on the matter and organised a
small hearing in spring 2007 in Riga. At my instigation, an exchange
of views on the theme was held during our meeting in Istanbul on
6 December 2007 to allow us to refine our proposals and to identify
concrete measures which could be proposed to the Parliamentary Assembly
to empower women in society and promote the contribution of women
to intercultural and inter-religious dialogue.

At the meeting of 17 April
2008, the committee proposed that the title of the report should
be changed to “Empowering women in a modern, multicultural society”.
3. On the 10th anniversary of the establishment of the Committee
on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men, I believe that the Council
of Europe, as an organisation that champions human rights, must
remain in the vanguard of those fighting to promote women’s rights
and equal opportunities for women and men and combating discrimination
and all forms of violence against women.
4. Women have a growing role in political, public and economic
life in Europe and have legitimate hopes that their rights will
be enshrined in legal instruments and in practice. However, as I
will attempt to show in this report, equality between women and
men, which forms an integral part of the human rights that the Council
of Europe promotes, is far from having been achieved in all 47 of
the Council of Europe’s member states. On the contrary, we must
continue and intensify our efforts to promote equal opportunities
for women and men in a Europe grounded in multicultural societies
which advocate integration and dialogue between the communities from
which they are made up. Empowering women therefore is a key to the
development of modern societies, based on respect for the fundamental
rights and freedoms of individuals, as well as measures to promote
equal opportunities for women and men and intercultural and inter-religious
dialogue.
2. Empowering women in the Council of
Europe member states
5. The role of women in society
has evolved differently under different cultural, historical and
religious conditions. While the strengthening of the democratic
rights of women and a tendency to gender equality are historically
recent (one hundred years) in even the most prosperous of our societies,
there remains much to be achieved in emerging and developing economies.
6. The Assembly has made it clear on several occasions that violations
of women’s human rights are never acceptable and that cultural and
religious relativism cannot justify or excuse such violations. Thus,
for example, Assembly
Resolution
1464 (2005) on women and religion in Europe explicitly stated in
paragraph 6: “It is the duty of the member states of the Council
of Europe to protect women against violations of their rights in
the name of religion and to promote and fully implement gender equality.
States must not accept any religious or cultural
relativism of women’s human rights [emphasis added].
They must not agree to justify discrimination and inequality affecting
women on grounds such as physical or biological differentiation
based on or attributed to religion. …”.
7. There has been a lot of progress in many member states over
recent decades when it comes to the realisation of gender equality
(not only in theory, but also in practice). In most Council of Europe
member states, women take an active part in political, public and
economic life and contribute to the development of the society they
live in. Unfortunately, however, “tradition” (be it based on religion
or culture) often still hinders women and girls from achieving their
full potential and participating equally in the development of their
society. The 2007 UNICEF report on the situation of children in
the world notes that gender equality gives double dividends: healthy,
well-educated women raise healthy, well educated children.
8. The following are some examples mentioned in recent Assembly
reports. Violence against women and girls (in particular domestic
violence) is still amazingly widespread in Council of Europe member
states.

Extreme violations of women’s
human rights, such as so-called “honour crimes”,

forced
marriages

and female
genital mutilation,

though
rare, are on the rise in some communities, even in Europe. Recently,
the Assembly issued a further appeal for member states to “combat
all forms of discrimination and violence (particularly forced marriages,
sexual mutilation of women, so-called ‘honour crimes’) which, in
the name of misinterpreted religious texts or customs, violate the
fundamental rights of women and equality between women and men”.

9. More generally, in most member countries, women are seriously
under-represented in parliament, government and other senior positions
in society

and opposition to “positive measures”
(such as quotas), which could quickly remedy this shortcoming, is
increasing in certain quarters. Discrimination against women on
the labour market is the norm.

The “gender pay gap” is as legendary
as it is real, as is the “glass ceiling”. Even access to the labour
market is not always guaranteed, since there is hardly any gender
equality when it comes to shouldering the burden of family and household
responsibilities.

Stigma
about women as housewives leads to a situation, such as in Germany
and the Netherlands, where women with higher education often choose
to stay at home to fulfil their obligations as mothers or wives
or to work a reduced working day. In the Netherlands only one in
ten professional women with children works full time in relation
to 9 out of 10 professional men who have children. We are witnessing
the feminisation of poverty.

10. It therefore seems clear to me that there is a need for the
role of women in modern societies to be empowered, so that the current
backlash against gender equality and women’s rights can be countered
on the basis of a consensus in society as a whole. It has already
been proven in countless studies that gender equality and respect
for women’s rights brings with it significant advantages for society
as a whole: the more gender equal a society is, and the more effort
it invests in promoting women’s rights, the more prosperous, healthy
and peaceful a society usually is. Thus, for example, investing
in the education of girls and promoting a higher participation of
women in the labour force brings measurable dividends in terms of
economic growth and of the population’s health, from which the whole
of society benefits. The role of education in this area is crucial
and governments should pay it the utmost attention. Our committee,
which is currently preparing a report on the rights of today’s girls:
the rights of tomorrow’s women (rapporteur: Ms Cliveti, Romania,
SOC) will have the opportunity to go further into this matter.

11. At all events, the Council of Europe must remain at the forefront
of efforts to promote gender equality and women’s rights in our
societies. The Assembly has recently adopted positions in which
it clearly states the need to enhance equality between women and
men and women’s rights – I am referring in particular to the Assembly’s
texts on respect for the principle of gender equality in civil law,

women and religion

and access to
safe and legal abortion in Europe.

I also welcome
the adoption of Recommendation Rec(2007)17 of the Committee of Ministers
to member states on gender equality standards and mechanisms, which
I hope will encourage member states to assess the progress made
on equality between women and men and take all the necessary steps
to ensure that women can participate fully in their countries’ economic,
social and political life. However, there is still a great deal
left to do and we must continue to campaign for active policies
which strengthen women’s rights and empower them.
3. How to promote gender equality and
women’s rights in our societies
12. Gender equality and women’s
rights do not necessarily have to conflict with a country’s traditions,
as long as these traditions are interpreted in a spirit of tolerance
and openness from a religious and cultural point of view. The aim
of promoting gender equality and women’s rights is not to undermine
a country’s or a community’s identity, or the possibility for individuals
to make their own choices about their way of life. Thus, for example,
no woman should be forced to go out to work if she would rather
stay at home to look after her children. However, if a woman has
no real choice but to stay at home to look after her children, because,
for example, her husband does not want her to go out to work, she
has not been properly educated as a girl, she is not offered a job
because she is a woman, she is paid a lower wage than her husband,
she is the victim of discrimination in the labour market or she
cannot afford suitable childcare, this is a different matter altogether. As
an example of the contribution of women to the economy, in the Netherlands
they contribute 27%. Estimates show that if women worked a little
more outside their homes and thus increased their contribution to
the Dutch economy, say to about 35%, this would cause the domestic
product to increase by 11% or by about €60 billion per year.
13. Similarly, many women and girls have little selfconfidence
or belief in their own worth, because some societies so clearly
favour men and boys. For example, because society puts pressure
on them to do so, women can be made to perpetuate their own discrimination.
This is a particularly big problem in countries outside the Council
of Europe, such as China, India, Pakistan and Afghanistan, to name
just a few countries, where the preference for boys (and the societal
standing of men) is so engrained in tradition that it is not unusual
for women in some parts of India to kill their newborn daughters
themselves, or for women in China to abort female foetuses as soon
as they find out they are expecting a girl. In societies which value
girls less than boys, selective abortion of unborn children because
they are girls and the murder of girls at birth has resulted in
a world “deficit” of millions of women and girls.
14. Traditional practices in Council of Europe member states rarely
go as far as this “feminicide”. However, most of our societies can
still be characterised as more or less patriarchal and women often
have a relatively subservient position within the family and society
– in particular where patriarchal cultural and religious traditions
are strongest, such as in certain rural areas, religious “strongholds”
of fundamentalists (of whatever religion – Roman Catholic, Evangelical
Christian, Orthodox Christian, Orthodox Jewish or Muslim, etc.)
and migrant communities (seeking to keep traditions alive in a foreign
country which may already have been abandoned in the countries of
origin).
15. What is needed therefore is a positive agenda designed to
empower women in society. This agenda should be based on common
values which can be accepted by all societies, cultures and religions.
It should be a progressive one which helps societies move towards
these common values while respecting core traditions (which do not
violate women’s human rights). This agenda should also include the
active participation of women in initiatives aimed at promoting
intercultural and inter-religious dialogue, which should always include
the gender equality dimension.
16. For such an agenda to have any hope of success, it is necessary
to involve all stakeholders. These stakeholders are not only women
(represented, for example, by the women’s movement), but also men:
men who may think that they have more to lose than to gain from
women’s empowerment, especially men who hold powerful positions
in society, such as decision makers in the public and political
sphere (members of government or parliament), religious leaders
or economic magnates. It will only be possible to move forwards with
a progressive agenda on gender equality and women’s rights if we
can prove to them that the whole of society – including themselves
– stands to gain from a strengthening of women’s role in society.
In this respect, I would like to welcome the motion for a resolution
tabled recently by Mr Mendes Bota and other colleagues seeking to
“involve men to achieve gender equality”, which will enable the
Parliamentary Assembly to work specifically on this issue

(rapporteur:
Steingrímur Sigfússon, Iceland, UEL).
17. I think that one of the reasons why we are currently suffering
from a backlash against women’s rights is that we do not, at the
moment, have the men “on board” with us. The (more than ten years
old) Beijing Platform for Action will only be realised effectively
– including in Council of Europe member states – when men realise that
women’s empowerment is in their interest too.
18. Therefore, on the global scale, I would like to suggest that
the Assembly, in accordance with
Recommendation 1716 (2005), support efforts to hold a 5th United Nations World
Conference on Women, which could relate to the recent challenges
that have been posed to women’s rights and gender equality (the spread
of HIV/Aids among women, women’s access to new information technologies,
trafficking in human beings and the deliberate victimisation of
women during armed conflicts), while rejecting any move to call
into question the decisions taken in Beijing in 1995 at the UN’s
last World Conference on Women (WCW). Such a conference could promote
the strengthening of women’s role in society on a global scale and
thus make a significant contribution to the aim of this report.
Allow me to cite from paragraphs 3, 5 and 7 of
Recommendation 1716 as my “closing remarks”:
“3. The Parliamentary Assembly considers that
this is not the right moment to give in to ‘gender equality fatigue’
and complacency or to give up on the Beijing Platform for Action
and its important goals. The reality of the situation of women in
the world today is alarming and in some areas even worse than in 1995.
The backlash against women’s rights and gender equality has taken
many forms: …
5. The Assembly considers that
only a new WCW can bring about the required worldwide effort and political
impetus, and that the organisation of such a conference is, in fact,
overdue. However, a renegotiation of the Beijing decisions needs
to be precluded: the 5th WCW should be called to deal exclusively
with the new and emerging challenges to women’s rights and gender
equality. …
7. The Assembly thus recommends
that the Committee of Ministers:
7.1. promote a United Nations
5th World Conference on Women, excluding the possibility of reopening the
Beijing Platform for Action for debate, to take place no later than
the year 2010;
7.2. invite the governments
of the Council of Europe member states to support this initiative;
7.3. organise a preparatory
European regional conference no later than the year 2007.”
4. Strengthening the role of women in
intercultural and inter-religious dialogue, specifically in Council of
Europe activities
19. The Council of Europe has carried
out various activities in the area of the participation of women
in intercultural and inter-religious dialogue. It should be recalled
that the Assembly adopted a resolution and a recommendation in 2004
on conflict prevention and resolution: the role of women,

which details a series of measures
aimed at getting women involved in the prevention and resolution
of conflict.
20. In the intergovernmental sector, the 5th European Ministerial
Conference on Equality between Women and Men, held in January 2003
in Skopje, was dedicated to “Democratisation, conflict prevention
and peace building: the perspectives and the roles of women”.

The
Steering Committee for Equality between Women and Men (CDEG) published,
in 2005, a report on the role of women and men in intercultural
and inter-religious dialogue for the prevention of conflict, for
peace building and for democratisation.

At its meeting in November 2007, it also
finalised a draft recommendation on the role of women and men in
conflict prevention and resolution and in peace building addressed
to member states, which should be examined in the coming months in
the Committee of Ministers.
21. At the same time, the Council of Europe will publish in 2008
a “White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue”,

which will set out the Organisation’s
main policy orientations in this field and provide policy makers
and practitioners at national, regional and local levels with guidelines
and analytical and methodological tools for promoting intercultural
dialogue. The Assembly Committee on Culture, Science and Education
was involved with the consultation process, which was completed
in June 2007. The North-South Centre of the Council of Europe organised
a consultation dedicated to the theme “Women in Intercultural Dialogue”
on 14 and 15 April 2007 in Geneva.
22. The Council of Europe also held a European conference on “The
religious dimension of intercultural dialogue” in San Marino on
23 and 24 April 2007. The representatives of religions and civil
society at this conference called for an open and transparent dialogue
based on the values of the Council of Europe to be set up, in a
spirit of consultation, as from 2008 (paragraph 12). However, only
the Council of Europe representatives at the conference regarded
the participation of women in that process as very important (paragraph
11).

23. It is time that these multiple Council of Europe efforts to
promote the role of women in intercultural and interreligious dialogue
were properly represented in the Council of Europe activity programmes
as a whole. Initiatives that target women more specifically should,
for example, be developed within parliamentary co-operation programmes,
particularly touching on the question of “frozen conflicts”, and
in “confidence-building measures” programmes, which could be proposed
by the Organisation.
5. Proposed recommendations
24. The Assembly considers it necessary
to counter the current backlash against gender equality and women’s
rights on the basis of a consensus in society as a whole.
25. The Assembly should invite member states to strengthen the
role of women in modern society and encourage them to:
- combat all cultural and religious
relativism, which still often prevents women and young girls from reaching
their full potential and participating equally in the development
of their society;
- combat discrimination against women and genderbased violence;
- promote “positive measures” to achieve balanced participation
of women and men in public, political and economic life;
- make education and training of girls and women a priority
issue and place emphasis on promoting an equal role for women and
girls in education programmes.
26. The Assembly should invite the Committee of Ministers to mainstream
gender equality aspects urgently into the intercultural and inter-religious
dialogue activities of the Council of Europe and, in particular,
to:
- take action to raise awareness
among representatives of religions and civil society in this area
while rejecting all cultural and/or religious relativism;
- develop programmes aimed at promoting participation by
women in intercultural and inter-religious dialogue.
27. The Assembly should, in addition, invite the Committee of
Ministers to make a separate effort to strengthen the role of women
in modern societies and, in particular, to:
- make a review of possible measures (best practice and
new suggestions) aimed at strengthening the role of women in modern
societies, including in intercultural and inter-religious dialogue;
- hold a major Council of Europe conference on the subject,
to which all stakeholders would be invited (including both women
and men, governmental, parliamentary and civil society representatives,
as well as religious leaders) and which would set a progressive
agenda based on common values aimed at strengthening the role of
women in society;
- carry out periodic monitoring of the progress achieved
on this agenda.
28. Finally, the Assembly should start to lobby more decisively
for the holding of a 5th UN World Conference on Women, as promoted
by the Assembly in
Recommendation
1716 (2005).
Reporting committee: Committee on Equal Opportunities for
Women and Men.
Reference to committee: Doc. 10999 and Reference No. 3270 of 2 October 2006.
Draft resolution and draft recommendation unanimously adopted
by the committee on 29 April 2008.
Members of the committee: Mr Steingrímur J. Sigfússon (Chairperson), Mr José Mendes Bota (1st Vice-Chairperson),
Mrs Ingrīda Circene (2nd
Vice-Chairperson), Mrs Anna Čurdová (3rd Vice-Chairperson), Mr Frank
Aaen, Mr John Austin, Mr Lokman
Ayva, Ms Marieluise Beck, Mrs Anna Benaki,
Mrs Oksana Bilozir (alternate: Ms Herasym’yuk),
Mrs Olena Bondarenko, Mr Pedrag
Bošcović, Mr Jean-Guy Branger,
Mr Igor Chernyshenko, Mr James
Clappison (alternate: Ms McCafferty),
Mrs Minodora Cliveti, Mr Ignacio Cosidó Gutiérrez (alternate: Mr Blanco), Ms Diana Çuli, Mr Ivica
Dačiċ, Mr Marcello Dell’utri, Mr José Luiz Del Roio, Mrs Lydie Err, Mrs Catherine Fautrier, Mrs Mirjana
Ferić-Vac, Mrs Maria Emelina Fernández
Soriano, Ms Sonia Fertuzinhos,
Mrs Alena Gajdůšková, Mrs Ruth Genner (alternate: Mr Müri), Mrs Svetlana Goryacheva
(alternate: Mr Lebedev),
Mrs Claude Greff, Mr Attila Gruber, Mrs Carina Hägg, Mr Ilie Ilacu, Mrs Fatme Ilyaz, Ms Nataša Jovanoviċ, Mrs Birgen Kele, Mrs Krista Kiuru, Mrs Irine
Kurdadzé, Mrs Angela Leahu, Mr Terry Leyden,
Mrs Mirjana Malić, Mrs Nursuna
Memecan, Mrs Danguté Mikutiené, Mrs Ilinka Mitreva, Mr Burkhardt
Müller-Sönksen, Mrs Christine Muttonen,
Mrs Hermine Naghdalyan, Mr Gebhard Negele,
Mrs Yuliya Novikova (alternate: Mr Popescu),
Mr Mark Oaten, Mr Kent Olsson, Mr Jaroslav Paška, Mrs Maria
Agostina Pellegatta, Mrs Antigoni Papadopoulos,
Mr Claudio Podeschi, Mrs Majda Potrata, Mr Jeffrey
Pullicino Orlando, Mr Frédéric Reiss, Mrs Mailis Reps, Ms Jadwiga Rotnicka (alternate:
Ms Nykiel), Mrs Marlene Rupprecht, Mrs Klára Sándor, Mr Giannicola
Sinisi, Ms Miet Smet, Mrs Darinka Stantcheva, Mrs Tineke
Strik, Mr Michał Stuligrosz, Mrs Doris Stump,
Mr Han Ten Broeke, Mr Vasile Ioan Dănuţ Ungureanu,
Mrs Tatiana Volozhinskaya,
Mr Marek Wikiński, Mr Paul Wille, Mrs Betty Williams, Mr Gert Winkelmeier,
Ms Karin S. Woldseth, Mrs Gisela Wurm,
Mr Vladimir Zhidkikh, Mrs Anna
Roudoula Zissi.
NB: The names of the members present at the meeting are printed
in bold.
See 21st Sitting, 24 June 2008 (adoption of the draft resolution
and draft recommendation, as amended); and Resolution 1615 and Recommendation
1838.