1. Introduction
1. The Parliamentary Assembly
has on several occasions expressed its concern about the situation
in Gaza and in particular has emphasised the need to find a political
solution to the crisis.

However, this report will focus on the
humanitarian aspects of the present conflict.
2. The following figures illustrate the continuously deteriorating
humanitarian situation in Gaza: 71% of the total population of Gaza
are Palestinian refugees, whose families were displaced and lost
their livelihoods in the 1948 Arab-Israeli war (1.3 million people);
43% of Gaza’s population is unemployed (unemployment rates among
young people are even more alarming, with 64.4% of young men and
82.8% of young women unemployed). 40% of Gaza’s population only
has access to water for between five and eight hours every three days
as a result of the insufficient and irregular power supply. According
to a World Bank report,

nearly
80% of Gaza’s population receives some kind of social assistance,
and nearly 40% falls below the poverty line. Real per capita income
in the territory is 32% lower than in 1994. In the last 20 years,
Gaza’s rate of growth has been one of the lowest in the world.
3. After a victory by Hamas in the 2006 parliamentary elections,
the organisation took over the Gaza Strip in June 2007 after a military
conflict with Fatah. The area has since become the scene of constant
conflict between Hamas and various other political factions opposing
Israel, the most notable of which was the Gaza War of 2008-2009,
which has substantially contributed to the deteriorating humanitarian
situation. In addition, military operations by the Israel Defense
Forces (IDF) – Operation Cast Lead in 2008, Operation Pillar of Defense
in 2012 and Operation Protective Edge in 2014 – have transformed
the Gaza Strip into a disaster area.
4. Since the Israeli military operation “Operation Protective
Edge” in the summer of 2014, the situation has become even more
worrying. Besides the huge number of people killed, the destruction
of civil infrastructure during the operations was enormous. It is
estimated that over 12 620 houses were totally destroyed and 6 455 severely
damaged. 17 650 families or about 100 000 persons were displaced.

As
a result, many people preferred to flee Gaza and join the masses
of refugees going to Europe.
5. In addition, the border tunnels – the main supply and commercial
trade route for goods into Gaza since 2007 – have been destroyed
by Egyptian and Israeli military forces because they are also used
to smuggle weapons and to carry out assaults into Israeli territory.
6. The main aim of the present report is to make an assessment
of the current humanitarian situation in Gaza on the basis of interviews
with both the Israeli and Palestinian authorities and reports from
reliable humanitarian organisations. It is important to understand
the humanitarian consequences of the state of siege in which Palestinians
in Gaza have lived since 2007 in order to propose some measures
to improve the situation.
7. Unfortunately, I was not able to visit Gaza since the Israeli
authorities denied me permission and the Egyptian authorities did
not respond to my request. This runs counter to the requirement
of Israel’s observer status with the Parliamentary Assembly which
should imply facilitation of fact-finding missions of the Assembly’s
rapporteurs.
8. The report endeavours to assess why Europe and its partners
have not succeeded in promoting European Neighbourhood Policy values
in this region and obtaining the opening of the Gaza territory to reconstruction
and humanitarian assistance. According to a recent report by the
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), due
to severe damage to the coastal aquifer and the overall environmental
degradation, Gaza is in danger of becoming unlivable by 2020. By
that time, its population is forecast to rise to 2 million and water
resources and infrastructure will no longer suffice. The engagement
of international donors is therefore a vital precondition for the
survival of Gaza’s population as well as for the ending of the blockade
of Gaza.
2. The historical context
9. The United Nations General
Assembly’s 1947 partition of the territory of the British Mandatory
Palestine into a Jewish and Arabic State

was accepted by the Jewish
Agency and after the withdrawal of the British military forces the
establishment of the State of Israel was declared on 14 May
1948. The State was then recognised by several States, including
America and the Soviet Union. The Arab League and the Arab Higher Committee
of Palestine rejected the partition plan, arguing that it did not
comply with the right to self-determination set out in the United
Nations Charter.
10. The day after the establishment of the State of Israel, the
armies of Egypt, Syria, Transjordan and Iraq crossed the former
Mandatory Palestine border and the first Arab-Israeli war started.
As a consequence of the war, around 750 000

Palestinians
were expelled from their homes or moved to the neighbouring countries,
to the Gaza Strip or to the West Bank. Between 1948 and 1967, the
Gaza Strip was controlled by Egypt and the West Bank by Jordan.
In 1967, the Six-Day War ended with the occupation of the Gaza Strip
and the West Bank by Israel.
11. In 1964, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) was established
with the aim of liberating Palestine through armed combat.

Ten
years later the PLO was recognised as the representative of the
Palestinian people by the United Nations General Assembly

and Palestine was granted observer
status with the United Nations.

Shortly after the First Intifada
broke out against Israel in 1987, Hamas was founded to liberate Palestine
from the Israeli occupation and to establish an Islamic State in
the Palestinian and Israeli territories. Hamas refused a peaceful
solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict at the time,

and its military wing has been attacking
Israel ever since, with methods which include suicide bombings and
rocket attacks. Hamas is classified as a terrorist organisation
by many States and international organisations, including the European Union,
the United States of America, Canada, Japan, Australia and Israel.

12. Egypt as a regional power has always played a key role in
the Israeli–Palestine conflict. In the first decades, Egypt, together
with other Arabic States, participated in several military operations
against Israel. However, in 1977, Egypt started secret negotiations
with Israel, resulting in the 1978 Camp David Accords and in the
Egypt–Israel Peace Treaty of 1979. In the accords, Egypt recognised
the State of Israel in return for Israel withdrawing its armed forces
from the Sinai, dismantling around 12 Jewish settlements with 4 500
civilian inhabitants, and restoring the peninsula to Egypt.

This agreement was strongly
criticized by the United Nations General Assembly, as it was concluded
without the participation of the PLO and the United Nations, neglecting
the Palestinian refugees’ right to return to the Israeli and Palestinian
territories and the Palestinians’ right to self-determination.

13. In 1992, after decades of military conflict between Israel
and the member States of the Arab League and after the increasing
number of clashes between the Israeli police and the Palestinians,
Israel and the PLO started negotiations that led to the Oslo Accords.
The PLO recognised the State of Israel in return for Israel recognizing
the Palestinians’ right to self-governance.

However,
they failed to agree on key issues such as the question of the Jewish
settlements in the Palestinian territories, the return of the Palestinian
refugees and the status of Jerusalem.
14. As a result of the Oslo Accords, in 1994 the Palestinian National
Authority (PNA) was established to govern some parts of the West
Bank and the Gaza Strip.

However,
this was not seen as an end solution for Palestine and further negotiations
were foreseen on the permanent status of the Palestinian territories
that should have covered the remaining issues including Jerusalem,
the refugees and the Jewish settlements. In 2000, the negotiations
ended without reaching a comprehensive peace agreement, which contributed
to the outbreak of the Second Intifada.
15. The first restrictions on the Gaza Strip were imposed by Israel
during the First Intifada in 1989: only those who owned a magnetic
card issued by the Israeli Government could leave Gaza. From 1991,
the Palestinians from Gaza needed a personal exit permit in order
to enter Israeli territories and, in 2000 during the Second Intifada
Israel imposed the total closure of the Gaza Strip.

16. In 2005, Israel launched a unilateral disengagement plan,
which meant the withdrawal of the Israeli army from
Gaza after 38 years of occupation, and the evacuation of
all
Israeli
settlements from the
Gaza Strip. As a consequence, the PNA gained full control of the
Gaza Strip with the exception of its sea space, air space and borders,
controlled by Israel.

17. In 2006, Hamas won the Palestinian parliamentary elections,
defeating the
PLO-affiliated
Fatah party and in 2007 took control of the Gaza Strip, ordering
the Fatah officials to give up their posts.

As
Hamas refused to renounce violence and to respect the previous agreements
with Israel, the Israeli Government, together with the Quartet (United
Nations, European Union, United States and Russia) imposed economic sanctions
against the Hamas-led Palestinian Authority on the Gaza Strip.

Israel also suspended the transfer of
the taxes it collected on behalf of the Palestinian authorities.
Between 2007 and 2010, the Israeli restrictions on the entry of
goods, including humanitarian aid and power supplies, and on exports,
were gradually tightened.

The humanitarian
situation became worse as Israel and Egypt closed their border crossings
with Gaza in 2007.

18. Since 2007, the Gaza Strip has been under a blockade operated
by both Israel and Egypt. The tightening of the blockade resulted
in a 71% decrease of the volume of entering goods between May and
October 2007.

The strict restrictions
on the import of construction materials had a very negative impact
on the economy of the Gaza Strip and made it difficult for the Palestinians
to rebuild houses destroyed by Israeli attacks.

Israel and Egypt have faced increasing
international pressure to ease the blockade due to the significant
increase in unemployment, poverty and food insecurity in the Gaza
Strip.

Since 2010,
Israel has allowed the import of all non-military goods, but continues
to inspect all goods arriving in Gaza.

19. After the 2011 revolution, Egypt reopened its border to Gaza
for women, children and men over 40, and since 2012 Egypt has started
supplying fuel to the Gaza Strip in order to ease the humanitarian
crisis.

In 2013,
Israel also eased the restrictions on the import of construction
materials.

20. In 2014, Israel launched “Operation Protective Edge”, a military
operation aiming at stopping rocket fire from Gaza towards Israel.

Protective Edge has led to the death
of thousands of people, the majority of them civilian Palestinians,

and seriously aggravated the humanitarian
situation in Gaza.
3. The
different aspects of the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza strip
3.1. The
free movement of people and goods
22. The restrictions on the free
movement of people and goods imposed by Israel and Egypt and their
drastic economic consequences are the main contributing factors,
besides the military attacks, to the current humanitarian crisis
in the Gaza Strip, as they seriously compromise people’s access
to food, housing, energy and basic public services. It is also a
violation of human rights. Both the Israeli and the Egyptian authorities explain
these restrictions by security threats provoked by the construction
of tunnels, smuggling of weapons and the organization of terrorist
attacks.
23. The restrictions were first imposed in the early 90s, and
these were reinforced after the imposition of the blockade in 2007.
While in 2005, 31 424 persons per month could enter Israel through
the Erez crossing, this number had decreased to 2 175 in 2008. There
has been a slight improvement since 2010, but in 2015 the number
of monthly crossings was still only around 50% of the number in
2005 (a monthly average of 15 027). At the same time, Egypt also
restricted the movement of Gaza citizens through the Rafah crossing
through which 25 813 persons a month could enter in 2006, but only
1 759 in 2008. In 2012, Egypt opened its border crossing, but since
2014 the number of monthly crossings decreased again from 25 187
in 2013 to 8 141 in 2014 and to 2 393 in 2015.

24. The number of truckloads entering and leaving Gaza has decreased
drastically since the blockade was imposed on the Gaza Strip. While
in 2005, an average of 777 truckloads were exported from Gaza monthly, this
number decreased to just three in 2008, which led to the closing
of hundreds of factories. The amount of exported trucks started
to increase in 2015 with 113 exported truckloads monthly, but it
is still far from the amount seen in the pre-blockade era. The number
of truckloads imported to Gaza has also dropped since the imposition
of the blockade, from 9 290 on average per month in 2005 to 2 236
in 2008. However, this number has increased in the last couple of
years, with 139 364 trucks entering Gaza in 2015.

According to a statement
by the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories Unit
(COGAT) of 13 July 2016, the Erez crossing point will also be opened
for the passage of merchandise for the first time in nine years.

In 2015,
the number of entry permits from Gaza into Israel doubled for the
representatives of the business sector and the entry quota was raised
from 3 000 to 5 000. About 100 000 people entered Israel from the
Erez crossing in 2015, representing a 300% increase compared to
2014.

25. The increase in the numbers of crossings (of people and goods)
is a positive trend, but not significant enough to ease the humanitarian
situation in Gaza. In 2015, the World Bank reported that the blockade
had reduced Gaza’s gross domestic product (GDP) by around 50%.

Exports
from Gaza stand at only 17% of their amount before Hamas took power.
In addition, the suspension of the entry of cement to Gaza from
3 April to 22 May 2016 delayed the reconstruction works in Gaza.
Only the total lifting of movement and access restrictions to and
from Gaza and a call for an end of the blockade of Gaza can provide
the necessary conditions for its reconstruction.
3.2. Food
insecurity
26. As a consequence of the blockade
and military operations, 47% of the households in Gaza have insufficient
access to food. Although food is available, goods are too expensive
for many people due to the high unemployment rate, which currently
stands at over 40% in the Gaza Strip.

The closing of the border
crossings to Israel and to the West Bank prevents the population
of Gaza from seeking employment outside the Gaza Strip and thereby
improving the economic and humanitarian situation. As I was told
by Palestinian non-governmental organisations (NGOs) during my visit
to Jerusalem and Ramallah, those who do manage to cross the borders
are sometimes arrested by the Israeli authorities or incited to
collaborate with them. In addition, the buffer zone covers around
23% of the Strip’s agricultural land, limiting the owners’ ability
to cultivate their own land. It is divided into two parts; the first
part is a no-go zone where it is forbidden for anybody to enter.
This area represents 4% of the territory of the Gaza Strip. The
second part is an area where no building is authorised, representing
19% of the territory.
27. Even if families can afford enough food, the poor quality
of the water, the low level of sanitation and hygiene, the shortage
of an energy supply and the insufficiency of imported cooking gas
makes its preparation difficult.

The
amount of cooking gas imported through the Kerem Shalom crossing
covers only a third of the estimated demand.

Another
serious issue is the access to fishing areas (see “Fishing zones”
below).
28. During meetings with the Israeli authorities, I was informed
that Israel has undertaken some measures in recent years to improve
the food supply by boosting the economy of the Gaza Strip. One of
these measures was the authorisation of the export of industrial
goods (textiles, furniture, scrap metal) and agricultural products, which,
according to the Israeli authorities, has resulted in over 15 000
tons of Gaza products being sold to the West Bank, Israel and further
afield since October 2014. The Israeli authorities also informed
me that Israel has permitted the import of engines and second-hand
vehicles into the Gaza Strip. According to the Israeli authorities,
since 2011 all types of food, consumer and other goods are allowed
to enter Gaza from Israel; the prohibitions now cover only weapons
and a list of equipment items which are considered convertible for
use by terrorists. In the first part of 2016, agricultural exports
and transfers from Gaza totalled US$5.6 million, which is three
times more than in 2015.

29. Although the amount of imported and exported goods has somewhat
increased in the last few years, it is still far from the quantities
imported and exported during the pre-blockade era.
3.3. Reconstruction
and import of construction materials
30. As a consequence of the Israeli
blockade affecting the import of construction materials, the lack
of an efficiently functioning government in Gaza and the delay in
payment of the promised international funding, the reconstruction
process is proceeding very slowly.
31. The Israeli authorities argue that despite the serious security
risk of Hamas using the construction materials imported to Gaza
to build terrorist infrastructure (e.g. cross-border tunnels), they
are making efforts to support the reconstruction work in the Gaza
Strip in the framework of the Gaza Reconstruction Mechanism.

Over
4.3 million tons of construction materials have entered Gaza since
the summer of 2014: 800 truckloads of building materials and other
goods per day. The building projects in Gaza permitted by Israel include
housing, schools, hospitals and infrastructure projects. To speed
up the reconstruction process, Israel has facilitated the movement
of Gaza reconstruction personnel; around 1 000 permits have been
issued since the summer of 2014 for travel from the West Bank to
Gaza.
32. However, Israel limits the import of a specific list of restricted
materials

into the
Gaza Strip, which includes “dual-use” items such as basic construction
materials (gravel, steel bars and cement), along with a wide range
of spare parts, computer equipment, vehicle products and technologies
normally used for civilian purposes but which may have military
applications. According to the information I obtained during the
fact-finding mission, this situation has not changed.
33. From 3 April to 22 May 2016, the Israeli authorities suspended
the supply of cement for the private sector, after the discovery
of a tunnel under Gaza into Israel.
3.4. Energy
and water supply
34. There are between 12 and 16
hours of power outages in Gaza every day. More than 70% of the households
in Gaza are being supplied with piped water for 6-8 hours only once
every two to four days, due to the insufficient power supply. The
estimated electricity requirement of the Gaza Strip is around 470
megawatts, of which only 45% is met. Part of the power supply is
ensured by the Gaza Power Plant which, due to fuel shortages, has
been operating at only half capacity since July 2013. Besides this
power plant, Gaza depends on the electricity supply from Israel
and Egypt.

35. The lack of sufficient power supply over the past nine years
has disrupted the delivery of basic water, sanitation and hygiene
services, which affects the lives of around 1.3 million refugees,
internally displaced persons, vulnerable people and vulnerable non-refugee
communities. Since 2010, 29 Palestinians in Gaza, 24 of whom were
children, have died in fire-related incidents due to power outages.
Besides the lack of a sufficient power supply, the slow implementation
of the Gaza Reconstruction Mechanism and the prohibition of the
importation of dual-use materials such as pumps, drilling equipment,
and disinfectant chemicals have also contributed to the insufficient
water supply, which resulted in taps running dry and sewage overflowing onto
the streets and into the sea. The already unsustainable water, sanitation
and hygiene situation in Gaza, due to the long-standing blockade,
has been worsened by the 2014 conflict, The situation has been seriously affected
by the prohibition on entry of “dual-use” materials, inadequate
power supplies and the lack of government regulation.
36. In order to improve the power supply of the Gaza Strip, Israel
has authorised the connection of Gaza to a natural gas pipeline.
According to the Israeli authorities, Israel will increase the water
supply to Gaza from 10 to 16 million cubic meters in the next few
months, and support small-scale desalination systems. Israel also supports
the international efforts to construct a large-scale desalination
plant in Gaza.
37. Water is a very precious resource in Gaza, as 95% of water
extracted from the coastal aquifer is not good for human consumption.
The construction of the seawater desalination plant financed by
the European Union is therefore a vital project for the population.
After the termination of the first phase of construction in June
2016, the plant was to produce 6 000 m3 of
potable water daily, to provide 75 000 Palestinians with drinking
water. After the termination of the second phase of the plant, in
36 months, its capacity will be doubled.

3.5. Access
to essential services
38. Around 1.1 million people in
the Gaza Strip are in need of humanitarian health and nutrition
assistance. As a consequence of the restrictions on the import of
goods, including medical resources, the shortage of power supply
and the Israeli attacks, the health system of Gaza has been seriously
compromised. Furthermore, the closure of the Rafah border crossing
by Egypt makes it very difficult for the referred patients of Gaza
to get medical treatment in Israel or in the hospitals of the West
Bank.

The
crossing has been closed since October 2014 (except during 42 days),
and currently there are at least 30 000 Palestinians waiting to leave
Gaza via Rafah for humanitarian reasons.

Meanwhile,
according to Palestinian NGOs, in 2015 Israel denied 3 188 patients
the right to leave the Gaza Strip to obtain medical treatment in
Israel or in the West Bank. 529 cases were rejected for security
reasons and in 320 cases the Israeli authorities placed restrictions
on the person who would accompany them for the same reasons.
39. I was informed by the Israeli authorities that Israel is trying
to improve the free movement of the citizens of Gaza for medical
purposes. In addition to granting entry permits for urgent medical
care for patients and their escorts, Israel has raised the number
of permits for travel to the West Bank for non-urgent health care.
Israel has also co-ordinated the movement of around 650 doctors
and medical teams from the Gaza Strip to the West Bank for continuing
education projects and conferences. According to the Israeli authorities,
in 2015, some 32 000 patients and their escorts travelled from the
Gaza Strip to Israel for hospitalisation in the West Bank or in
Israel. Likewise, over 6 700 tons of medicine and medical equipment
entered Gaza through the Kerem Shalom crossing.
40. Although there has been some improvement in the number of
crossings via Erez since 2014, the situation is still critical as
thousands of people still have no access to medical treatment because
they cannot get an entry permit into Israel or Egypt. To deny people
vital medical treatment is a violation of human rights.
41. Inside Gaza, the health system does not function normally,
and 40% of employees in the medical sector have not been paid their
full salaries since May 2014.

The co-ordination between Ramallah
and Gaza is much reduced and people have to wait for very long periods
to obtain the necessary drugs and treatments. As a result, the number
of chronic diseases, cases of cancer and people who urgently need
operations has significantly increased.
42. The destruction of and damage to school facilities and property
caused by military operations have very negatively influenced the
quality and quantity of educational services and the psychological
well-being of children and teachers in the Gaza Strip, with around
462 770 kindergarten and school-age children affected.

UNRWA has reported a dramatic
increase in cases of psychological trauma and the United Nations
Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) has identified 360 000 children
in need of psychological support, the majority of whom still need
attention.
43. In Gaza, recurrent hostilities and the ongoing blockade continue
to impact the learning environment for Palestinian refugee children,
and frequently disrupt access to formal education for the enclave’s
child population, including over 263 000 students at UNRWA schools.

44. According to the Palestinian NGOs, the freedom of academic
choice has also been limited by Israel, as students from Gaza are
denied entry to the universities of the West Bank even in the case
of non-availability of courses in the Gaza Strip.
3.6. Fishing
zones
45. Israeli forces continue to
maintain a buffer zone in Gaza, using live fire to maintain the
closure. The buffer zone areas are made up of rich agricultural
and fishing grounds, now in large parts inaccessible to the population.
46. Under the Oslo Accords the coastal fishing zone was set at
20 nautical miles. Nevertheless, Israel has imposed greater restrictions,
motivated by security concerns. By sea, Israel maintains a permitted
fishing zone of between 3 and exceptionally 9 nautical miles. In
April 2016, this zone was extended to 9 nautical miles.

47. The Palestinian NGO Al Mezan documented a massive and exceptional
escalation in Israel’s attacks and harassment of Palestinian fishermen,
including use of live fire, arbitrary arrest employing humiliating
and degrading practices and use of physical violence and verbal
abuse. Boats and equipment are frequently damaged and confiscated.
The fishermen are prevented from accessing their fishing territories
and valuable resources; these direct attacks are a violation of
their fundamental human rights, including the prohibition of arbitrary
arrest and detention and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.
Although fishing was previously one of the most economically viable
sectors in Gaza’s economy, the fishermen are now reduced to severe poverty
and unemployment as a direct result of Israel’s policies and practices
against them.
48. The use of excessive and intentional force without justification
against Palestinian civilians in the buffer zone, including against
farmers, journalists, medical crews and peaceful protesters, runs
blatantly counter to human rights principles and the international
law-enforcement standards laid out in the Code of Conduct for Law
Enforcement Officials and the Basic Principles on the Use of Force
and Firearms. Cases of the deliberate fatal shooting of individuals
who posed no imminent danger to life amounts to an appalling pattern
of apparently systematic unlawful killings.
49. Since 2010, Al Mezan has documented the killing of 136 Palestinians
in Gaza by Israeli live fire in the buffer zone, including 20 children.
An additional 1 775 people were injured, including 282 children.
4. Issues
of special humanitarian concern
50. The 2014 aggressions put under
particular pressure those who are the most vulnerable and already have
experienced suffering and discrimination: internally displaced persons
(IDPs), women and children and people with disabilities.
4.1. The
situation of IDPs
51. There are around 95 000 internally
displaced people in Gaza as a consequence of the attacks in 2014. 78 000
of these are housed in temporary shelters and around 168 000 people
in Gaza are accommodated in poor quality and/or overcrowded housing.
According to UNRWA, around 140 000 refugee homes were damaged or
destroyed in the 2014 conflict, over 12 000 of which are now uninhabitable.
More than one year after the ceasefire there are still 47 000 refugee
families whose homes need to be repaired.

52. To date, two years after the destruction, around 3 000 houses
have been rebuilt, which means that six more years are needed to
complete the restoration of damage. Many IDPs rent accommodation,
live in tents or are accommodated by relatives. Their living conditions
are often unsatisfactory and overcrowded, and lacking in basic services
and privacy. However, UNRWA has ensured that all IDPs have been
provided with long-term accommodation facilities, which enabled
all collective centres for IDPs to be closed in June 2015.
53. The majority of IDPs survive only through the cash and food
assistance provided by UNRWA. In 2016, almost one million IDPs in
Gaza required food assistance. The ongoing blockade of Gaza provokes
a chronic shortage of medicines and medical care. The number of
cancer cases and kidney failure has increased tremendously; the
suicide rate is high.
54. In order to live in dignity, the respect, protection and fulfilment
of the right of IDPs to adequate housing is crucial. The major challenge
for improving the living conditions of IDPs in Gaza is to relax
restrictions imposed by the Israeli authorities on bringing construction
materials into Gaza. Another important problem is the internal divide
between the Palestinian National Authority and Hamas and, therefore,
the absence of effective governmental authorities in Gaza. The international
donors should also comply with their commitments and release funding
for the reconstruction of Gaza.
4.2. The
situation of women, children and disabled people
55. Women and children are the
most vulnerable population groups in the Gaza Strip. Of particular
concern is the situation of widows, internally displaced females,
women and girls with disabilities, adolescent girls and female farmers.
During the hostilities of 2014, 495 children

and 299 women were killed, of whom
16 were pregnant. More than 2 000 women and children were injured.
The situation of widows is particularly difficult as at least 790
women lost their spouse and family breadwinner during the 2014 hostilities.

56. According to Palestinian NGOs, 51% of children in Gaza are
suffering from physical and mental traumas, as many of them witnessed
the killings and more than 1 500 lost their parents. As a result
of the massive destruction of homes during the military attacks,
many women and children were displaced and were accommodated with
host families or in shelters. The traditional discrimination of
women in Palestinian society can be exemplified by the way women
are excluded from property rights, which creates even more difficulties in
obtaining shelters.
57. Women in Gaza are also discriminated against in the labour
market and only 20% of working-age females are in employment. The
unemployment rate among women exceeds 60%, which is twice as high
as among men. As traditionally women are employed in the agricultural
sector and over the course of the hostilities the land was heavily
damaged, many women lost their employment opportunities.
58. Amnesty International has reported on so-called “honour crimes”
against women and girls inside Gaza. Young girls drop out of school
and marriage before the age of 18 has increased.
59. The international community should pay special attention to
the vulnerability of women and children in Gaza, provide them with
special protection and ensure the respect of their rights to humanitarian
assistance by adopting a gender perspective.
60. The situation of disabled people has deteriorated since the
Israeli military operation in 2014. About two thirds of all orthopaedic
injuries treated at hospital in Gaza had resulted in disability
and required rehabilitation: some patients had amputations of upper
limbs or lost one or both legs. Lack of means, for example prosthetic limbs,
remains high and the cost of replacing a damaged wheelchair can
be prohibitive for disabled people without an income.
5. International
assistance
61. At the Cairo Conference organised
by Egypt, Norway and the Palestinian National Authority on 12 October
2014, a meeting which had the aim of raising funds for the reconstruction
of Gaza after the Israeli military operation in July-August 2014,
the donors pledged US$3.5 billion to support the Gaza Strip.

It was agreed
to provide support during the three-year period 2014-2017, and the
World Bank was enlisted to monitor the process and provide regular
reports on its implementation to the Ad-Hoc Liaison Committee.
62. Around 100 international NGOs and 19 United Nations agencies
are providing humanitarian assistance in the Palestinian territories.
The main multilateral donors are the United Nations and the European
Union, while the United States, Canada, Japan, Saudi Arabia and
five European countries (Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, Belgium and
France) provide the main bilateral humanitarian assistance.

63. The United Nations Relief and Work Agency for Palestine refugees,
through its 30 000 staff, provides vital services to the Palestinian
population including food assistance, emergency shelter assistance,
education and health care. In addition, UNRWA offers targeted cash
assistance to Palestinian refugee families and back-to-school financial
support to students at UNRWA schools. It also provides employment
opportunities to Palestinian refugees, creating around 25 000-40
000 jobs per year.
64. The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian
Affairs, under the leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinator, co-ordinates
the yearly Humanitarian Response Plan developed by the humanitarian
community to respond to the needs of the Palestinian population.
It also manages the secretariat for the forum of national and international
NGOs working in the Palestinian territories (Humanitarian Country Team).
The work of the Humanitarian Country Team is organised by clusters
of all key humanitarian response sectors. The 2016 Humanitarian
Response Plan has foreseen US$400 million to address the most urgent humanitarian
needs in Gaza.
65. The European Commission is one of the most important donors
to humanitarian projects in Gaza. Since 2000, it has provided a
total of €700 million in humanitarian aid to meet the basic needs
of the people in Gaza and the West Bank. In 2015, €18.5 million
was allocated for humanitarian projects in Gaza. In 2016, the European
Union invested €20 million in the construction of the seawater desalination
plant, which after its completion will produce 12 000 m3 of
safe drinking water for the population of Gaza.
66. In 2016, over €422 million will be paid by the European Union
(40 million), Austria, Ireland and Portugal to the Palestinian National
Authority for social allowances. Over 119 000 Palestinian families
benefit from cash transfer programmes and almost two thirds of the
beneficiaries live in Gaza

.
67. Turkish aid to Palestine for the years 2014 and 2015 reached
a total of US$100 million. The recent normalisation of relations
between Turkey and Israel, announced in June 2016, has already resulted
in a first delivery of 11 000 tons and a second delivery of 2 200
tons of Turkish humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip by ship.
68. However, as at 31 July 2016
, only
46% of pledged funds have been distributed. Out of the US$1 596 billion
that has been disbursed, US$612 million was allocated to priority
interventions outlined in the Gaza Detailed Needs Assessment and
Recovery Framework, which covered 16% of total recovery needs across
five sectors impacted by the 2014 war.

69. To improve the reconstruction process in Gaza, the United
Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East peace process developed
the Gaza reconstruction mechanism, which was agreed upon with the
Israeli and Palestinian authorities. Its main task was to respond
to the reconstruction needs of Gaza, while meeting the security
conditions requested by Israel. However, the process of the management
of importation of reconstruction materials and approval of reconstruction
projects foreseen by the mechanism has become very complicated,
which has significantly delayed reconstruction. Moreover, this mechanism
does not prevent abuse of the reconstruction materials and manipulation
of financial aid. The Israeli authorities have the right to veto
some projects on the basis of security concerns and the Palestinian
authorities are delaying some projects due to conflicting internal
procedures. The Palestinian authorities do not control the situation
inside Gaza and cannot guarantee the ownership of the implemented
projects.
70. Many humanitarian organisations also complain about problems
created by the Israeli authorities in issuing permits to enter and
leave the Gaza Strip for national Palestinian staff. Humanitarian
operations in Gaza are also complicated by the restrictions imposed
by Hamas and the closure of the Rafah crossing by Egypt.
71. A short analysis of international assistance to Gaza has shown
that even with existing mechanisms for the co-ordination of this
assistance there is a need for urgent reconsideration of the whole
process, beginning with the assignment of funds, approval of reconstruction
projects and ensuring their security and national ownership. I consider
that a new international conference concerning the reconstruction
of Gaza should be urgently called for, involving all parties of
the conflict and all donors. It is very important that this time,
the Palestinian population, in particular its civil society, be
represented at such a conference. The conference could propose a
time-bound action plan to end the blockade of Gaza ensuring security
conditions for the free movement of people and goods. It should
also evaluate the efficiency of the existing Gaza Reconstruction Mechanism
and align the reconstruction process with the principles of transparency
and accountability, involving all national and international humanitarian
actors.
6. Possible
solutions
72. The humanitarian situation
described above requires immediate action to end the suffering of
people living in Gaza.
73. First of all, the immediate needs of the population in water
and electricity provision, as well as their access to medical and
social services, should be satisfied. This can only be done by the
Israeli Government in co-operation with international humanitarian
organisations. Israeli efforts to find a sustainable solution to
the water and energy situation in Gaza should be supported.
74. The blockade of the Gaza Strip imposed by Israel, which entered
its tenth year in June 2016, must be lifted. The blockade has subjected
the Palestinians living in Gaza to collective punishment in flagrant contravention
of international human rights and humanitarian law. The blockade
has to end to ensure that the population of Gaza has access to basic
and inalienable human rights.
75. To prepare the removal of the blockade the crossing points
between Israel and Gaza in Kerem Shalom need to be further upgraded
and action has to be undertaken to develop further crossing points
at Erez and Karni. It is also important to assist in easing Gaza’s
exports to Israel, the West Bank and beyond, particularly of agricultural
products and textiles, and to enable Palestinian workers to seek
employment in Israel.
76. All Palestinian groups must reject and condemn acts of terrorism
against Israel. The International community must have a dialogue
with all relevant partners in the conflict.
77. Israeli and Palestinian women must be involved in the process
to solve the conflict, as is mentioned in the United Nations Resolution
1325.

78. Certainly, the main precondition for the normalisation of
the lives of the people in Gaza is respect for the cease-fire. For
this, it is important to upgrade security co-operation between the
Palestinian authorities, Israel, Egypt, the United States Security
Coordinator (USSC) and the European Border Authority Management (EUBAM)
(in co-operation with the European Union Coordinating Office for
Palestinian Police Support (EU COPPS)) in line with the relevant
articles of the Agreement on Movement and Access of November 2005.
79. To enable a peaceful solution to the crisis in Gaza, the Palestinian
authorities must be encouraged to form an effective and cohesive
government, bridging the two territories. This government, in co-operation
with the member countries of the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee (which
includes the Palestinian National Authority, the Government of Israel,
Israel and Palestine's neighbouring States, as well as the leading
members of the international donor community), should prepare a
multi-annual Action Plan for Palestinian State Building, as was
agreed in April 2016.
80. The Action Plan in question must provide for the construction
of the physical infrastructure of the State of Palestine: plan for
a road and railway network, and create the enabling conditions –
in the spheres of security and environment – for the construction
of a seaport and an airport for Palestine. It has to include measures
to ease access and movement and conclude an Israeli-Palestine agreement
over water, to guarantee full and equal water rights and supplies
to the Palestinian people.
81. Finally, I would like to reiterate the Assembly’s constant
position that only a negotiated two-State solution to the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict and cessation of the construction of new settlements and
extension of old ones on the Palestinian territory can create the
necessary framework for the normalisation of the humanitarian situation
in Gaza and the promotion of Palestinian State-building. It is therefore
the role of the Assembly to encourage the Government of Israel and
the Palestinian authorities to start negotiations on a mutual and
full commitment to this solution.