Print
See related documents
A. Draft resolution
(open)
B. Draft recommendation
(open)
C. Explanatory memorandum
by Ms Aurora Floridia, rapporteur
(open)
Report | Doc. 16493 | 29 September 2026
Europe, the fastest-warming continent: accelerating climate action with young people
Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development
A. Draft resolution 
(open)1. The Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) has established that human activities, principally
through emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), have unequivocally
caused global warming. Since its first assessment report in 1990,
the IPCC’s conclusions on this causal link have become increasingly confident.
By adopting the Paris Agreement in 2015, States committed themselves
to keeping the increase in the global average temperature below
2°C and to pursuing efforts to limit it to 1.5°C above pre-industrial
levels. In 2023, the IPCC established that this threshold was expected
to be reached as early as the beginning of the 2030s, even under
scenarios involving substantial reductions in emissions, and that
warming could reach 3.2°C by 2100 if the current trajectory were
maintained. Yet in the face of this clear prognosis, GHG emissions continue
to rise.. On 2 September 2026, the United Nations Environment Programme
announced that warming would not be halted before reaching 1.5°C
and that the overshoot of 1.5°C would henceforth have to be managed.
2. The Parliamentary Assembly asserts that this overshoot must
not be treated as insignificant: 3°C is not simply a worsening of
the climate, but a shift towards a world marked by extreme heatwaves,
massive pressures on water, food, insurance, infrastructure, etc.
Nor can it be interpreted as rendering obsolete the commitments
made under the Paris Agreement. On the contrary, it requires the
right economic, social and democratic questions to be asked, and
emissions to be reduced immediately in order to limit the scale
and duration of the overshoot. Present action must not be deferred
by relying on the uncertain promise that the carbon emitted today
could be removed from the atmosphere tomorrow. A possible return
below the 1.5°C threshold can neither erase the damage caused while
that threshold was exceeded nor serve as a climate policy.
3. The summer of 2026 confirmed it: Europe is experiencing the
effects of global warming more intensely than other continents.
The World Meteorological Organization and the European Union’s Earth
observation programme – Copernicus – report that over the past thirty
years, the continent has warmed by around 0.56°C per decade, more
than twice as fast as the global average, and its temperature is
already around 2.5°C above pre-industrial levels. The summer of
2026 was the third hottest ever recorded in Europe and the hottest
on record in Western Europe, with an average temperature 2.54°C
above the 1991–2020 average, compared with 1.34°C higher in 2022
and 1.54°C higher in 2024. By the end of July 2026, half of the
European Union and United Kingdom was affected by drought; Europe’s
four major rivers – the Loire, Po, Rhine and Danube – had reached
exceptionally low levels, and more than 500 000 hectares of land
had been burnt in wildfires by August 2026.
4. The Assembly joins its voice to that of the scientific community
in warning member States: the climate change is destroying the conditions
in which all forms of life, including humans, can thrive, and thus
poses a direct threat to the planet’s habitability. The Assembly
calls for the concept of habitability to be placed front and centre
in European climate action, as a non-negotiable value on which all
others must rest. For the habitability of the planet is the primary
condition for life and thus the starting point and the heart of
all other human rights enshrined in the European Convention on Human
Rights (ETS No. 5) and the European Social Charter (revised) (ETS
No. 163). Without a liveable climate, accessible water, clean air,
and working ecosystems, human rights and the freedoms and dignity
they rely on are merely abstract concepts.
5. Climate change kills. It undermines livelihoods and exacerbates
vulnerabilities and inequalities. The 2026 Lancet Countdown report
puts the number of heat-related deaths in Europe in 2024 at 62 000
and notes an increase in such deaths in 99.6% of the regions monitored.
Between 2015 and 2024, heatwave exposure among infants and elderly
persons increased by 121% and 266% respectively compared with the
period 1991–2000. This is compounded by the fact that, in all member
States, the adverse effects on health and living conditions caused
by climate change are concentrated among those least able to protect
themselves.
6. The negative economic impacts attributable to climate change
in the member States are now visible and quantifiable. In the European
Union, extreme weather events have caused losses totalling 822 billion
euros since 1980, including €208 billion over the period 2021-2024
alone. These figures do not include productivity losses, healthcare
expenditure and other indirect costs. According to the European
Climate Risk Assessment, annual losses could reach 2.2% of GDP by
the year 2070 and a quarter of EU regions could experience GDP losses
greater than 5%, even if global warming is limited to +1.5°C. Warming
of around 4°C could reduce global GDP by 10–23% by 2100, compared
with a scenario in which no further warming occurs.
7. Young people are uniquely vulnerable here: they have contributed
little to cumulated emissions yet will suffer the consequences throughout
their lives. Among them, girls and young women may be particularly vulnerable
when climate change deepens existing inequalities: it can undermine
their access to education, resources and healthcare, including sexual
and reproductive healthcare, and increase their exposure to violence.
This injustice also extends across generations. A child born in
2020 will be 80 years old in 2100: for them, the end of the century
is not an abstract horizon, but an entire lifetime. According to
the IPCC, they will experience a near five-fold increase in extreme
weather events under a 3°C global warming scenario. This vulnerability
is not only a future concern: in Europe, approximately 43% of schools
are located in urban heat islands, where the average temperature
is at least 2°C higher than in the surrounding areas. Young people
will have to cope with the impacts on their health, livelihoods
and personal development, while also funding adaptation measures
and attempting to repair the damage that delayed action will have
exacerbated.
8. Yet Europe does have a genuine capacity for action. Recent
studies estimate that, even if other regions of the world were not
to step up their efforts, reducing European emissions would cost
less than the damage to our continent that inaction would entail.
Insufficient global action is therefore no justification for a European wait-and-see
approach. The decisions taken today will have a very tangible impact
on the quality of life on the continent for the remainder of the
lives of young people today and the generations to come. Intergenerational equity
demands that those who currently hold the power to decide and act
in our European countries do not pass on the burden of risks, damage
and reparations to their children.
9. The Assembly is convinced that young people’s creativity,
dynamism, social engagement and skills must be mobilised to address
climate change. This does not mean tokenistic consultations without
any genuine follow-up. Young people should participate in setting
priorities and making trade-offs, including choices concerning the
economic, tax and financial frameworks that shape incentives and
investment decisions. In particular, they should be involved in
defining the criteria governing public support, so that such support
ceases to favour activities harmful to the climate and ecosystems
and instead encourages low-emission and resource-efficient models,
the circular economy, biodiversity protection and sustainable entrepreneurial
initiatives led by young people.
10. In its Resolution 2553 (2024) “Strengthening the youth perspective
in the work of the Parliamentary Assembly” reaffirmed in Resolution 2639
(2026) “Strengthening democracies with young people: from participation
to shared responsibility” the Assembly committed to integrate a
youth perspective into the follow-up to its work. Youth involvement
in its work on the environment and climate crisis is essential.
11. The Assembly underlines moreover the importance of the Maastricht
Principles on the Human Rights of Future Generations, which provide
a useful framework for addressing the long-term effects of public
decisions, the representation of future generations and intergenerational
equity in climate action.
12. The Assembly welcomes the adoption of Recommendation CM/Rec(2024)6
of the Committee of Ministers to member States on young people and
climate action, the first international instrument specifically dedicated
to this issue. It invites member States to implement it fully and
without delay. In order to make it an effective lever for accelerating
climate action, it calls on them in particular to:
12.1. enshrine in their laws and climate
plans ambitious overall and intermediate targets that are compatible
with human rights and accompanied by deadlines, monitoring, corrective
measures and an assessment of their effects on young people and
future generations, in order to ensure an equitable distribution
of efforts between generations;
12.2. establish permanent mechanisms enabling young people in
all their diversity, while ensuring in particular the effective
participation of girls and young women, to contribute to the formulation,
arbitration and monitoring of climate policies, including their
economic, tax and financial dimensions, with a clear mandate, sufficient
resources and an obligation for the authorities to respond publicly
to their proposals;
12.3. include youth delegates, with appropriate status, training
and resources, in national delegations participating in European
and international climate negotiations, and to report publicly on
their contribution;
12.4. establish, at national, regional and local levels, participatory
budgets and multi-annual funds enabling young people and youth organisations
to design, select and implement projects for mitigation, adaptation
and nature restoration, while ensuring that small organisations
and informal groups have access to this funding;
12.5. equip all young people with the knowledge and skills they
need to understand climate choices, counter misinformation and greenwashing,
and take part in collective action, through schooling, vocational
training, higher education, non-formal learning and youth work,
as well as through equitable access to reliable and accessible information,
while ensuring that curricula, textbooks, teaching resources and
information materials provide scientifically accurate, up-to-date
information tailored to young people’s ages and needs;
12.6. develop paid pathways to quality jobs in sectors essential
for reducing GHG emissions and for society’s adaptation to the effects
of climate change, and to ensure that climate policies do not exacerbate
precarity among young people, particularly in terms of access to
housing, energy, food and mobility;
12.7. prevent and address the effects of climate change on young
people’s physical and mental health, particularly eco-anxiety, through
accessible and tailored services, while strengthening their capacity
to take collective action;
12.8. prevent the discrimination that young people face related
to climate change, to pay special attention to young people who
are vulnerable or marginalised, especially those exposed to multiple
and overlapping forms of discrimination, and to ensure that climate
policies are based on the principles of climate justice, fairness,
and intergenerational solidarity;
12.9. ensure protection of young environmental defenders against
threats, excessive surveillance, strategic lawsuits against public
participation (SLAPPs), disproportionate use of force and any undue restriction
of their freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association;
12.10. provide local and regional authorities with the necessary
powers and resources to work with young people to develop local
mitigation and adaptation policies, and to make schools, universities, youth
centres and other essential services resilient to climate risks.
13. The Assembly calls on national parliaments to carry out an
annual review of the implementation of climate commitments. This
review should take the form of a public debate involving young people
in all their diversity, during which the government would report
on the gap between the targets set and the results achieved, the
public and private funding mobilised and the corrective action proposed.
14. Lastly, the Assembly calls on those member States which have
not yet done so to recognise at national level the right to a healthy
environment and to support, within the Council of Europe, the drafting
of a legally binding instrument guaranteeing this right as a standalone
one, with particular regard to the rights of young people and future
generations.
B. Draft recommendation 
(open)1. The Parliamentary Assembly
refers to its Resolution… (2026) “Europe, the fastest-warming continent: accelerating
climate action with young people”. It notes that the habitability
of the planet is the primary condition for the values of freedom
and dignity enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights
(ETS No. 5) and the European Social Charter (revised) (ETS No. 163)
and that the decisions taken today will determine this habitability
throughout the lives of present and future generations.
2. The Assembly welcomes Recommendation CM/Rec(2024)6 of the
Committee of Ministers to member States on young people and climate
action, the first international instrument specifically dedicated
to this issue. The recommendation establishes an essential framework
for protecting young people’s rights, supporting their action and
ensuring their effective participation in climate decisions. It
is now time to accelerate and make visible its implementation across
all member States.
3. The Assembly stresses that every delay in climate action shifts
an increasing share of the risks, harm and effort required onto
today’s young people and future generations. In this regard, the
judgment in Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz
and Others v. Switzerland is particularly significant:
the European Court of Human Rights recognised the need for a fair
distribution of the burden between generations and for immediate
action to avoid placing a disproportionate burden on future generations.
The judgment makes clear that compliance with the obligations arising
from the European Convention on Human Rights cannot be reduced to
setting climate targets. It requires an effective framework, a pathway
with interim targets and verifiable deadlines, the quantification
of national emissions limits through a carbon budget or an equivalent
method, and concrete measures to ensure that emissions are actually
reduced.
4. The Assembly also welcomes the adoption of the Council of
Europe Strategy on the Environment (2025-2030) and its Action Plan,
which follow up on the commitments made by Heads of State and Government
in the Reykjavík Declaration and help implement the Reykjavík process
on environment and human rights. It considers that their implementation
provides an opportunity to embed the youth perspective and intergenerational
equity permanently in the Organisation’s work.
5. The Assembly therefore recommends that the Committee of Ministers:
5.1. organise, before the five-yearly
review scheduled for 2029, a mid-term review of the implementation
of Recommendation CM/Rec (2024)6, based on common indicators, information provided
by States and independent contributions from national youth councils,
youth organisations and young environmental defenders, and publish
the results and any best practices identified;
5.2. supplement the Action Plan related to the Council of Europe
Strategy on the Environment (2025–2030) with an initiative on futures
literacy and intergenerational justice, drawing on the methods developed
by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO), the work of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation
and Development (OECD) on intergenerational governance and the United
Nations Declaration on Future Generations, and adapting them to
the Council of Europe’s needs;
5.3. make the supervision of the execution of the judgment Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others
v. Switzerland an opportunity to ensure exemplary execution
in full compliance with the positive obligations identified by the
European Court of Human Rights, based on the adoption of an ambitious carbon
budget accompanied by binding intermediate targets, as well as on
a mechanism endowed with sufficient resources and genuine supervisory
powers; such execution should be guided by the protection of the
rights of young people and by the need to avoid placing a disproportionate
burden on future generations;
5.4. without further delay, begin drafting of a legally binding
instrument recognising, at Council of Europe level, the autonomous
right to a healthy environment, guaranteeing substantive and procedural rights,
giving due consideration to present and future generations and providing
for an independent monitoring mechanism to which civil society and
young people can contribute;
5.5. strengthen the ambition, transparency and exemplary nature
of the Council of Europe’s internal approach to reducing its carbon
footprint, by publishing annually its carbon footprint, the progress
made in relation to its trajectory and the implementation of its
action plan, by explaining any deviations and adopting the necessary
corrective measures, and involve the Advisory Council on Youth in
this monitoring.
6. The Assembly recommends that the Committee of Ministers recognise
that armed conflicts and environmental destruction can significantly
increase climate vulnerability and have long-term consequences for young
people and future generations, and ensure that climate resilience,
environmental restoration and reconstruction policies take into
account their rights, needs and interests.
C. Explanatory memorandum
by Ms Aurora Floridia, rapporteur 
(open)1. In preparing this report, the
rapporteur sought to follow up on the commitment made in Resolution 2553 (2024)
“Strengthening the youth perspective in the work of the Parliamentary
Assembly” to hold an annual thematic debate with the participation
of the Advisory Council on Youth, a commitment reaffirmed in Resolution 2639
(2026) “Strengthening democracies with young people: from participation
to shared responsibility”. She therefore took care to involve youth
representatives in the preparation of this report and in its debate
in the plenary session.
2. The climate emergency is no longer a projection: it is a scientifically
established reality and one that Europeans are experiencing at first
hand. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has unequivocally
demonstrated the role of human activities in global warming and
warned that every additional fraction of a degree increases the
risks. Its findings have been confirmed and clarified in relation
to Europe by the World Meteorological Organization, the European
Union’s Copernicus programme and numerous other studies. The continent
is warming by 0.56°C per decade – more than twice as fast as the
global average – and its temperature is already around 2.5°C above
pre-industrial levels. The summer of 2026 – the third hottest ever recorded
in Europe and the hottest in Western Europe – saw deadly heatwaves,
droughts affecting half of the European Union and the United Kingdom,
exceptionally low water levels in major rivers and more than 500 000 hectares
ravaged by wildfires. The economic arguments are no less compelling:
extreme weather events have already caused €822 billion in losses
across the European Union since 1980, including €208 billion between 2021
and 2024, not to mention healthcare costs and productivity losses.
The data cited in the GIEC report all point to the same conclusion:
inaction will cost far more than action, whereas reducing emissions
has the potential to yield substantial economic and health benefits.
Taking action on climate change is not only a scientific and humanitarian
imperative, therefore; it is also the economically responsible choice.
3. To articulate what is at stake today, it is proposed that
the Assembly embrace the concept of habitability.
Habitability does
not merely refer to the ability of human beings to survive in a
given environment: it is based on the interdependent relationships
through which the diversity of life produces and sustains the conditions
enabling all forms of life, including humanity, to exist, thrive
and reproduce. Human societies are not separate from the biosphere
therefore, but rather dependent on its health. Just as freedom and
dignity have become core values in the protection of the human person,
so habitability must become a core value of European climate action,
enabling decisions to be assessed in terms of their impact on living
conditions, both today and in the long term.
4. Young people must not be regarded solely as a vulnerable group
or as the future beneficiaries of climate action. Their knowledge,
experience and capacity for mobilisation must contribute, as of
today, to the design, negotiation and monitoring of public policies.
Building on Recommendation CM/Rec(2024)6 of the Committee of Ministers
to member States on young people and climate action, the draft resolution
proposes making their participation permanent and effective, supporting
their initiatives, giving them access to knowledge, skills and quality
jobs, protecting young environmental defenders, ensuring respect
for their rights, and preventing climate change from negatively
impacting their living conditions and their physical and mental
health.
5. The rapporteur attaches particular importance to ensuring
that this participation encompasses the economic choices that determine,
in practical terms, the manner and pace of the climate transition.
In her view, it is important that economic incentives and public
support cease to favour activities that are harmful to the climate
and ecosystems and instead encourage companies that effectively
reduce their emissions, preserve resources and biodiversity, develop
the circular economy or commit to a measurable transition towards sustainable
models.
Attention should
be paid to young people’s entrepreneurial initiatives and to businesses created
around these objectives. The gradual phasing out of ineffective
fossil fuel subsidies would free up resources to support these initiatives.
6. The draft resolution and recommendation aim to ensure that
climate action is sustainable and verifiable. They propose interim
targets aligned with electoral terms of office, rather than merely
distant deadlines, as well as regular parliamentary scrutiny and
an assessment of the consequences for young people and future generations.
The draft recommendation calls on the Committee of Ministers to
use the monitoring of the execution of the Verein
KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland judgment
as an opportunity to ensure that it is implemented in an exemplary
manner, thereby giving substance to the positive obligations identified
by the European Court of Human Rights and providing guidance to
member States. However, the rapporteur points out that the indirect
protection afforded by the European Convention on Human Rights (ETS No.
5) and the European Social Charter (ETS No. 35 and ETS No. 163 (revised))
is not sufficient to remedy the absence, within the European Convention
system, of an autonomous right to a healthy environment. While other
regional human rights protection systems have already enshrined
this right, it is time – as the Assembly has been calling for since
1999 – for the Council of Europe to fill this gap by commencing
work without further delay on drafting a separate, legally binding
instrument, guaranteeing substantive and procedural rights together
with an independent monitoring mechanism.
7. Lastly, the rapporteur attaches great importance to the Council
of Europe setting an example through its own operations. The Organisation
already has a carbon footprint that is updated annually, a quantified emissions-reduction
pathway and an action plan. The draft recommendation proposes strengthening
this approach by incorporating the reduction pathway into decisions
concerning buildings, travel, procurement, digital activities and
events; publishing the results, any deviations and the corrective
measures adopted; and involving the Advisory Council on Youth in
monitoring them. The Council of Europe would thus demonstrate that
youth participation, transparency and climate accountability must
also guide the functioning of international organisations.
8. This report constitutes an initial policy response, one that
is deliberately concise and action-oriented. It sets in motion a
process that will be continued and explored in greater depth by
Ms Yuliia Ovchynnykova’s (Ukraine, ALDE) report on “Climate action
as a human and democratic responsibility”. That report will examine more
broadly the institutions, democratic safeguards and accountability
mechanisms needed to drive long-term climate action, share the burden
fairly, combat inequalities, ensure an informed public debate and
hold public authorities and economic actors to account. The proposals
set out here on youth participation, the long-term perspective,
parliamentary scrutiny, intergenerational equity and the right to
a healthy environment are intended to feed into this discussion
and to be further developed in this second report and in the continuation of
the Assembly’s work on the urgent question of climate action.
