Sitemap

  • EN
  • FR
  • Extranet
The COE website

Parliamentary Assembly

  • Home
  • Site
  • Work
  • Amendment
Back to the document Post-monitoring dialogue with Turkey

Draft Text(s)

  • Doc.  13160
  • 08/04/2013
  • en html, en version pdf

Compendium of amendments

  • Final version
  • Download
  • en html, in pdf version

List of amendments

  • Amendment 1
  • Amendment 2
  • Amendment 3
  • Amendment 4
  • Amendment 5
  • Amendment 6
  • Amendment 7
  • Amendment 8
  • Amendment 9
  • Amendment 10
  • Amendment 11
  • Amendment 12
  • Amendment 13
  • Amendment 14
  • Amendment 15
  • Amendment 16
  • Amendment 17
  • Amendment 18
  • Amendment 19
  • Amendment 20
  • Amendment 21
  • Amendment 22
  • Amendment 23
  • Amendment 24
  • Sub-Amendment to Amendment 24
  • Amendment 25
  • Amendment 26
  • Amendment 27
Amendment preview
Amendment 6 | Doc. 13160 | 22 April 2013

Signatories: Ms Pelin GÜNDEŞ BAKIR, Turkey, EDG ; Mr Jonathan EVANS, United Kingdom, EDG ; Mr Edward LEIGH, United Kingdom, EDG ; Ms Ganira PASHAYEVA, Azerbaijan, EDG ; Dame Angela WATKINSON, United Kingdom, EDG

In the draft resolution, in paragraph 14.3, delete the third sentence.

Explanatory Note :

The geographical limitation implemented by Turkey is not a reservation of Turkey but quite the contrary; a right recognized by article 1(B) of the 1951 Geneva Convention. The judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of A.G. and others v. Turkey (Application No. 40229/98, 15 June 1999) makes it very clear that geographical limitation and reservation cannot be considered as a discrimination regarding the rights defined in the European Convention on Human Rights.

Published version
  • Amendment
  • Download
  • en html, en version pdf

 

Assembly's voting results

See all voting results on the adopted text (Resolution, Recommendation, Opinion) detailed page.

Back to the detailed page