1. Introduction
1. An increasing number of States
recognise the role played by diasporas and promote their involvement in
home policies by developing national policies for engaging diasporas
and by adopting governmental strategies for their implementation.
2. Traditionally, States have pursued two types of policies in
relation to their diasporas. Some seek merely to strengthen cultural
ties with the community through educational programmes and cultural
promotion abroad, without moving towards a genuine inclusion strategy.
Others implement measures on political participation, citizenship,
identity, and the human capital represented by nationals living
abroad, to ensure a genuine bond between them and their country
of origin.
3. In a globalised world where migration is constantly on the
rise, Europe must promote a streamlining of national diaspora policies,
in order to recognise, valorise and dignify its presence either
to the countries of origin, either in the host countries. Clearly,
thought needs to be given to establishing a common core of practices
to be followed by the member States of the Council of Europe when
formulating strategies targeting the diasporas in question.
4. This report seeks to draw conclusions from previous resolutions
made by the Parliamentary Assembly, pointing out how strengthening
diaspora policies represents a decisive opportunity in terms of
the economic, social and cultural development of the countries of
residence and origin, and a greater cohesion and inclusiveness in
society.
5. In the report, I have looked closely at the existing policies
in member States, ranking the mechanisms and strategies put in place
by States vis-à-vis diasporas. As the factual basis of this report,
I have used the replies by the national parliaments of the member
States to the European Centre for Parliamentary Research and Documentation
(ECPRD) questionnaire on diaspora related issues.The replies by
national parliaments to this questionnaire can be found in document
AS/Mig/Inf(2021)02.
6. States must create an attractive climate so that these diasporas
can contribute to the national interests (of countries of origin
and host countries) by safeguarding the position of diasporas in
the political decisions that are made. Today, many countries still
limit foreign nationals' access to information and maintain legal
and administrative barriers to their economic engagement, such as
access to employment and property rights. To counter this, interaction
between national authorities and diaspora organisations should be
strengthened by developing, at European level, various legislative
proposals, policy initiatives and administrative measures. Adopting
a common policy in this area is imperative in order to capitalise
fully on all the opportunities that diasporas bring.
7. A set of concrete recommendations on policy instruments and
on improving inter-State co-operation as regards diaspora related
policies proposed in this report could be used for the development
of a European strategy on diasporas.
2. The Assembly’s previous work
8. The Assembly began its work
on diaspora issues in 1999, when it adopted
Recommendation 1410 (1999) “Links between Europeans living abroad and their countries
of origin”. The positive role of diasporas has been highlighted
in several Assembly reports, resolutions and recommendations, showing
that expatriate communities play a crucial role in contributing
to the socio-economic development of their countries of origin and
host countries, including “Engaging European diasporas: the need
for governmental and intergovernmental responses”,
“Democratic participation of migrant
diasporas”,
“Educational and cultural networks
of migrant and diaspora communities”,
and “Diaspora cultures”
as well as “Integration of migrants in
Europe: the need for a proactive, long-term and global policy”
and “Ensuring that migrants are
a benefit for European host societies”.
9. Diaspora-related policies differ significantly from country
to country. In this respect, the report produced by the Assembly
in 2014 on “Democratic participation for migrant diasporas”
provides a good overview of different
practices in member States as regards political participation of
diasporas. For example, as regards the right to vote and to stand
for election in different types of elections, and the arrangements
for voting from abroad, some European countries impose restrictions
on their citizens’ right to vote, related to the length of stay abroad
or activity performed.
10. These reports remind us that diaspora groups are transnational
actors who assist both countries of origin and countries of destination
in different ways: building and strengthening peace and development,
trade, human rights, or cultural interaction and exchanges of know-how.
In addition, diasporas can be key intermediaries in helping migrant
workers to become better integrated into their new social environment. Including
diasporas in national policies, in the case of both sending and
receiving States, does in fact lead, therefore, to economic, social
and cultural benefits, as the Assembly has consistently pointed
out.
11. The Assembly, and in particular the Committee on Migration,
Refugees and Displaced Persons, reaffirmed its determination to
tackle diaspora-related issues by setting up a Sub-Committee on
diasporas and integration, and the Parliamentary Network on Diaspora
Policies was tasked with making specific recommendations in this
area (see below).
12. In 2009, the Assembly adopted
Resolution 1696 (2009) and
Recommendation
1890 (2009) “Engaging European Diasporas: the need for governmental
and intergovernmental responses”. The Recommendation invited the
Committee of Ministers “to give further consideration to the establishment,
under the auspices of the Council of Europe, of a Council of Europeans
abroad, a body representing European Diasporas at the pan-European
level, which could organise a forum of Europeans abroad at regular
intervals”. Subsequently, the Assembly adopted
Resolution 2043 (2015) “Democratic participation for migrant diasporas”. The
result of almost 20 years’ work of the Assembly on diaspora issues
thus initiated the establishment of the Parliamentary Network for
Diaspora Policies in 2017.
2.1. Parliamentary
Network on Diaspora Policies
13. While the Council of Europe
is clearly relevant for diasporas in Europe, it has never had the
issues of diaspora as a particular focus. The Parliamentary Network
on Diaspora Policies has been a timely project to enable representatives
from different countries to come together and exchange ideas and
examples of best practices in this area. It brings together more
than 200 members, of which 110 are MPs (members of national parliaments
and/or Assembly members) from 25 countries and 61 representatives
of diaspora associations from 26 countries.
14. The network mainly focused its work towards exchanges and
co-operation with members of parliaments, diaspora associations,
and State institutions from the countries of origin and host countries
of migrants, with the aim of building inclusive societies through
the introduction and implementation of national diaspora policies.
15. Since the Launching Conference of the Parliamentary Network
on Diaspora Policies in 2017 in Lisbon, the Network met at two annual
forums and five conferences.
16. Four major issues were dealt with by the Network in depth
since its creation:
- The question
of how diasporas can contribute to the fight against extremism and
radicalisation; a sensitive problem, which concerns not only migrants,
but also the population of host countries;
- The question of how diasporas can become economic, cultural
and social “bridges” between countries of origin and countries of
destination and hence contribute to development;
- The question of how public authorities at various levels
can (and should) co-operate with diasporas, in particular in countries
of origin, in order to tap into the potential that emigration has
for communities of origin;
- The question of how diasporas can contribute to the State-building
processes of their countries of origin and host countries, in particular
how the State authorities can reduce administrative and bureaucratic barriers
and remove legal restrictions to diasporas’ active contribution.
17. All events brought together parliamentarians, high-level officials,
experts, academics, members of diaspora networks and civil society
on diverse and contemporary diaspora-related topics.
18. In 2018, the Network created a European Diaspora Prize to
reward the most outstanding diaspora association each year, with
the best accomplishments in supporting integration in host countries,
fostering cultural identity, or developing links with countries
of origin. The Platform of Women of the Congolese Diaspora of Belgium
was awarded the first European Diaspora Prize in 2019.
19. The conclusions drawn from the activities of the Parliamentary
Network underline the urgent need to develop a European strategy
on diasporas: the differences in national practices regarding diasporas
slow down the process of inclusion in the host countries and inhibit
the ability of host States and States of origin to mutually benefit
from the diasporas.
3. Diaspora’s
definition
20. Speaking about a future European
diaspora policy, it is important to understand how the term “diaspora” is
used in different European countries. The replies to the above mentioned
ECPRD questionnaire provide clarification of this question. Many
countries do not distinguish between the terms “emigrants” and “diaspora”. In
some countries, like France, Turkey, Italy and the Russian Federation,
the members of diaspora are called “French/Italian/Turkish compatriots
living abroad”. A legal definition of diaspora is given only in
a few countries, including Croatia, Georgia, Portugal, Serbia, the
Slovak Republic and Ukraine.
21. Generally speaking, migrant workers, refugees and second and
third generation immigrant families are referred to as diaspora
communities. The movement of these groups is caused by different
factors and challenges with which they are confronted. Yet, the
communities remain culturally, socially and linguistically connected,
regardless of the reasons of their movement, which is calling us
to look at the wide range of changes as well as challenges caused
by the wave of migration, refugee flows, emergence of transnational networks
and, finally, of diasporic communities.
22. Therefore, for the purpose of this report and summarising
different existing definitions, the term “diaspora” is used to define
a group of people originated from the same country residing abroad
and keeping strong cultural, economic and social links with their
country of origin.
4. Diaspora
contribution to European societies
23. Diaspora members make a positive
contribution to the development of European countries and communities
in many ways, including by the promotion and transfer of their cultural
and democratic values, norms and practices. They can also facilitate
the integration of, and provide support to, newly arrived migrants in
their countries of destination by upholding their economic, political,
legal and cultural interests, by helping them to cope with psychological
factors which relate to language barriers, loss of usual social
networks, legal uncertainty and inequality of access to social welfare.
24. It is said, that some diaspora members, especially those originating
from conflict areas import these conflicts into their host countries.
It should however be stressed that diaspora communities are not homogeneous
and often include opposing groups. Some critics supporting the discourse
of “failing integration of migrants in Europe” accuse diaspora of
contributing to the existence of “parallel societies”. Personally,
I do not support such accusations, notwithstanding that there will
always be members of a community who take a different path. It is
a task of the State to develop policies which encourage the social
cohesion of each community member and accompany the integration
process of each migrant.
25. Diasporas’ participation in State-building is a multi-layered
matter, involving not only international institutions but also national,
regional and local ones.
26. National parliaments have a central role to play in determining
diaspora policies in their countries along with numerous international
organisations such as the United Nations (UN), the International
Organisation for Migration (IOM) and the United Nations Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), which recognise and
support cultural, social and political rights of diaspora groups.
27. The IOM refers to the “3 Es”
to better connect the contribution
of transnational communities and diasporas: Engage, Enable and Empower:
Engage via outreach in the countries of origin through networks, investors,
skilled professionals or academics, and in the host countries through
embassies and consulates, migration community associations and social
media. Enable by guaranteeing their access to essential public services;
by ensuring respect of their social rights in return for their respect
of local laws and customs. Certain policies are promoted by the
IOM in order to facilitate the integration of migrants in host countries:
promoting ethical labour recruitment which protects job-seekers
from abuse and exploitation, reducing costs of remittances, and
mainstreaming migration into national development policies. Empower
by giving diaspora communities the opportunity and capability to
establish their own priorities of action between communities abroad
and the countries of origin.
4.1. Engage
diaspora
28. When we speak about diaspora’s
engagement, we need to have, first of all, a very clear idea about
the general profile of diaspora communities relating to their particular
country and their interests, needs and potential. In scientific
language this process is called “mapping diaspora”. It involves
a deep analysis of the number of people represented, their socio-demographic
characteristics and the way they are organised and interact with
society. This information is essential for the policy making process,
as depending on these factors it will be possible to define realistic
objectives and calculate necessary resources for the implementation
of these policies.
29. The main challenge in mapping diaspora is obtaining reliable
information, taking into account that national statistic systems
are often unable to provide this. There are different sources of
information such as data gathered by statistical offices of governments,
diplomatic representations and a range of surveys. However, this
information is not centralised and is widely dispersed among different
institutions. Moreover, the percentage of registered migrants in
consulates and diplomatic representations is very low. In this regard, regular
co-operation with host countries is very important, as they can
provide information and contacts on different migrant communities,
their organisations and their involvement at the local level. In
this regard, the main task of policy makers is to compile all this
relevant information and to provide its quantitative and qualitive analysis.
30. Here we come to a very important tool in the design and implementation
of the diaspora related policy of the State, namely an institutional
mechanism. Even in the process of diaspora mapping, it becomes essential to
have a single institutional body bringing together all diaspora
related information and providing regular updates.
31. The analysis of the ECPRD questionnaire shows that in many
European countries, such institutional bodies, very often called
“offices”, are created under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This
can be explained by the mandate of this ministry to deal with matters
related to foreign countries. However, countries such as Armenia,
Bulgaria, Croatia and Turkey, which have important communities abroad,
have created separate governmental agencies dealing with diaspora
communities.
32. It should be stressed that the diaspora mapping process and
the involvement in it of diaspora communities and foreign partners
is a rather challenging task, which needs a specially designed methodology and
strategy. To my mind, the international organisations, including
the Council of Europe could be of great help in designing such a
methodology on the basis of existing best practices.
33. The diplomatic representations of the countries abroad, such
as the embassies, the consulates, as well as the cultural institutes,
have to play an important role in developing good relations with
diaspora associations, so that the members of diaspora have trust
in governmental bodies and actively contribute to the development of
diaspora related policies. The practice of the appointment of a
special diplomatic counsellor on diaspora and citizens abroad in
each diplomatic representation could facilitate this task.
34. Speaking about diaspora engagement policies, over the past
decade, a wide range of different strategies, policies, programmes
and projects have been developed and implemented across Europe. Diaspora
engagement strategies differ a lot from country to country depending
on their goals and motivations; some countries prioritise the promotion
of their culture and language abroad, others the economic engagement of
diasporas in development, or provide direct support to diaspora
organisations abroad. Whatever the approach, leveraging and harnessing
the resources, contacts, knowledge, and talents of diasporas from
all over the world, is now generally viewed as an effective State
policy approach. Therefore, governments should consider their diasporas
as an important political, economic, cultural and diplomatic asset,
and not simply as migrants, with all the prejudices this consideration
involves.
35. In this regard, Portugal, Ireland, or Italy, all countries
with very ancient and large diasporas, provide very interesting
examples of creation of policies and political and administrative
bodies to strengthen the ties with their citizens living abroad.
36. As mentioned previously, the diaspora engagement process includes
also economic, political, cultural and migration spheres, therefore,
the State bodies responsible for these domains should be actively
involved in the policy making process. In this respect, the exchange
of experience between such bodies in different countries, and their
capacity building, could be supported by the work of international
organisations.
4.2. Enable
diaspora
37. Freedom of movement amongst
member States of the European Union (EU), labour mobility throughout Council
of Europe member States and conflict-driven migration, past and
present, have contributed to the increase of diaspora communities
across Europe. Combined with technological advances which facilitate connectivity
and information-sharing across borders, this results in diaspora
communities having an increasingly prominent role in democratic
processes in their countries of origin, as well as in their host countries.
38. In some member States, diaspora communities significantly
contribute to the gross national product of their countries of origin
by sending remittances. This substantial economic contribution to
their countries of origin should be accompanied by the right to
participate in political processes.
39. To enable diaspora communities to better contribute to the
development of their countries of origin and host countries, member
States of the Council of Europe should ensure respect for their
rights and create the necessary conditions for the best use of their
potential.
4.2.1. Political
participation
40. There are two levels of democratic
participation which have implications for diaspora: political participation
in the host countries where they are naturalised and have the right
to political activism, participation and representation; and political
participation in the countries of origin, enabling them to participate
in national elections and referendums. The host countries should
support the right to political participation and representation
of the country of origin of diaspora communities.
41. The issue of voting rights and citizenship for diaspora communities
with due regard to the integrity of elections and political processes
is a main guarantee to their political participation. Council of
Europe member States’ approaches to voting and dual citizenship
rights of diaspora communities are far from uniform. The degree
to which diaspora communities are free to vote and enjoy dual citizenship
rights varies, with some countries still preventing migrant and
diaspora communities from voting in their host countries, while
others maintain a restrictive approach by depriving their diaspora
of their right to vote once they have left their country of origin.
Such differences of approach inevitably create cases where, depending
on the policies of a host country or country of origin, certain
diasporas will exercise greater political influence than others.
Unless properly managed, these discrepancies run the risk of creating
tensions amongst countries of origin and host countries due to fears
of expansionist policies and negative discourse with regard to the
perceived political and cultural loyalties of diaspora communities.
42. Diaspora policies across member States should focus on promoting
the political integration of diaspora communities into their host
countries, while also encouraging and facilitating ongoing democratic
engagement with their countries of origin. Without advocating a
“one shoe fits all” approach member States should harmonise standards
and procedures, so far as possible, to enable diaspora communities,
where appropriate, to continue exercising their right to democratic
participation in their countries of origin and also in their host countries.
43. Diaspora communities should also encourage political participation
of their community members, which includes empowering eligible members
of the community to run for election.
44. Member States, parliamentarians and diaspora associations
should actively promote and communicate positive narratives about
diaspora communities by highlighting their accomplishments as contributors
to their host countries and countries of origin and as facilitators
of diplomatic and political ties between countries.
45. However, as it is rightly pointed out by Steven Vertovec “for
host countries, the dual political loyalties suggested by diasporas
may raise fears of “enemies within” and terrorist sleepers cells.”
Supported
by media such rhetoric can provoke xenophobia and discrimination.
At the same time, for the countries of origin, diasporas can cause
political problems by supporting voices critical to governments
or the opposition.
46. The media also has a major role to play in the promotion of
political and cultural diversity both within and across nations
and in countering negative stereotypes about migrant and diaspora
communities by displaying their political, economic and cultural
potential as active members of society. In this context, media in
the host countries directed to its diasporas need to have the necessary
attention and support. Additionally, social media serves as an important
platform for connecting and mobilising diaspora on the politics
of their countries of origin. This is particularly relevant during
election and referendum campaigns. Amid emerging concerns about the
potentially harmful aspects of online political mobilisation, social
media companies should facilitate the online political engagement
of diaspora communities while ensuring that community standards
relating to online election and referenda campaigns uphold the integrity
of the political process and international standards on fair and
free elections.
47. Governments should engage diaspora in decision-making processes
on issues which directly affect them, notably through recognising
and facilitating the possibility for diaspora to elect representatives
of their communities to national parliaments. This can be facilitated
by the creation of formal institutional channels dedicated to diaspora
issues under the remit of relevant government agencies and departments.
4.2.2. Economic
development and building cohesive societies
48. The economic development of
any country depends upon its capacity to better utilise people’s
skills and talents and to promote innovative technologies and businesses.
In a time of economic and political crisis in Europe and in many
other parts of the world, all efforts should be deployed to create
cohesive societies, enabling the full and active participation of
every member in their development and economic growth.
49. Diaspora’s involvement in the State economy is one of the
main conditions for building strong and successful cohesive societies.
50. Diasporas have a comparative advantage in their ability to
connect with a wide range of potential partners and supporters in
countries of origin and host countries. These connections encourage
investment, outsourcing and trade in general, as well as fostering
strategic partnerships. There are vast diaspora communities of skilled
professionals and entrepreneurs all over Europe who have strong
economic potential for the region. These diaspora communities are
an economic asset for their countries of origin through the sending
of remittances, as well as for their host countries who benefit
from their skills and expertise. Diasporas can participate in investment
projects aimed at attracting investments for the economic development
process of the country of origin.
51. Countries with higher levels of diaspora involvement have
proved their better prospects for economic growth, and some governments
have introduced programmes to encourage diasporas and their families
to invest. Some States officially recognise their diasporas as an
integral part of national development plans. But despite the obvious
advantages of attracting investors and entrepreneurs from diasporas
to work with their countries of origin, many countries still impose
restrictions on them. For instance, some States place limits on foreign
nationals’ ownership of real estate property and land, which can
hinder engagement for second and subsequent-generation diasporas
if they have chosen another nationality. Complicated procedures
for diploma recognition, limited access to complex and/or strict
financial systems and administrative procedures hamper diasporas
integration in the host societies. It is necessary to include provisions
in the national legislation which regulate the migrant workforce
and their access to working visas and work permits, as well as ensure recognition
of their diplomas and professional qualifications.
52. The impact of diaspora’s remittances has been internationally
recognised and for some countries they represent as much as 10-30%
of their gross domestic product. The Covid-19 pandemics has significantly impacted
remittances to countries of origin. These remittances may fall by
about 20% in 2020, impacting on some of the poorest populations.
European governments should facilitate formal remittances by migrants
and diaspora members during the crisis by lowering transfer fees
and ensuring the security of money transfers.
53. Social security of migrants is one of the most important aspects
of their inclusion process and is therefore a good investment in
the economic development of the country. The creation of a European
mechanism for fostering social security and protection for working
migrants and their families would be useful for the social inclusion
of migrants and hence the prosperity of host countries.
54. It is important to develop qualification standards and facilitate
the recognition of migrants’ diplomas and skills. Necessary vocational
training for migrants and diaspora members can be promoted by a
partnership between governments, business communities and the diaspora
associations. More co-operation is needed between various international
stakeholders in order to promote economic inclusiveness of diaspora
members.
55. Social and economic inclusion can be facilitated by speeding
up and facilitating the acquisition of nationality of migrants.
4.2.3. Cultural
and social cohesion
56. The experience of many European
countries had shown that diaspora could be powerful partners for
the States to foster not only economic development but also build
cultural and diplomatic bridges between home and host countries.
57. Culture can easily bring together people of different origins
and backgrounds. Migrants representing different cultures and religions
bring diversity in the society and contribute to cultural exchanges.
However, a lack of knowledge of the host society, its culture, language
and traditions can create major obstacles for migrants’ entrance
into the social and economic fabric of the host country.
58. There is growing interest in questions relating to intercultural
dialogue in a European and global context where efforts to establish
closer ties and collaboration between communities within our societies
and between peoples, to build together for the common good, are
constantly imperilled by lack of understanding, high tension and
even barbarous acts of hatred and violence.
59. Violence, racism and hate speech are not only barriers to
migrants’ integration but felonies in their own right, and provoke
an increased fear of those who have different origins, beliefs or
cultures which, in turn, leads to migrants being increasingly discriminated
against.
60. Only long-term investment in policies and strategies promoting
intercultural and inter-religious dialogue between diasporas and
host countries can bring noticeable results in changing the mentality
and behaviour of people.
61. Representatives of various cultures and religions have a pivotal
role in helping the integration of migrants by offering them a message
of moderation and tolerance, by giving them support and help as
appropriate and by dissociating from and condemning those who spread
a message of hatred and intolerance in the name of a culture or
religion.
62. Authorities of both countries of origin and host countries
should engage and co-operate with representatives of diasporas in
order to devise and implement measures aimed at promoting integration
and avoiding radicalisation and extremism of migrants.
63. Local and regional authorities play a pivotal role in helping
the integration of migrants, however they are rarely involved in
diaspora engagement policy making. In most European countries diaspora
related policies are developed at the national level and the main
resources are concentrated in the national agencies, while local
authorities are responsible for the integration and social inclusion
of migrants. I believe it is very important to develop co-operation
between the local authorities of countries of origin and host countries
and empower local authorities with diaspora policy implementation
functions.
64. Non-governmental actors working at the local level and playing
an important role in the integration of migrants, such as civil
society organisations, churches, ethnic professional associations,
educational associations should also be involved as partners of
the authorities in the implementation of diaspora related activities
and benefit from appropriate resources.
65. Education plays an essential role in the promotion of democratic
citizenship. More generally, education is a defence against the
rise of violence, racism, extremism, xenophobia, discrimination
and intolerance.
66. Schools and other education establishments should be prepared
to welcome children and students speaking a language other than
that of the host country. Special educational programmes should
be developed to promote knowledge of different cultures, languages
and religions.
67. Schools should also promote pluralism and diversity at an
early age. Students at primary, secondary or graduate levels must
be made aware of the scientific, literary and political achievements
of diasporas throughout history.
68. The international community, in general, and the Assembly,
in particular, have an important role and responsibility to provide
a framework for inter-cultural and inter-religious dialogue and
promote a message of tolerance.
4.3. Empower
diaspora
69. Diaspora associations contribute
greatly to the creation of a positive image of their country of
origin abroad. Many European governments use the potential of their
diasporas as an important foreign policy instrument, whereby active
support from the country of origin allows diaspora communities to
influence the policy of their host countries. However, it is important
to prevent any manipulation of diaspora communities as vehicles
for promoting expansionist policies and violating the sovereignty
of other countries. At the same time, it is also true that many
countries lack knowledge of diasporas and their interaction with
their countries of origin, therefore these countries cannot respond
to the needs of diasporas and effectively support their activities.
The establishment of trust between governments and diasporas is
also a challenge. It is important to understand how States can empower
diasporas by providing necessary support to their associations and
contributing to their successful integration in host countries.
70. Many experts believe that the future of a globalised society
is the creation of global networks of people, united with the same
ideas and the same social, cultural or economic interests. Diaspora
networks are good models contributing to the humanistic aim of creating
better societies. The tremendous work done by diaspora organisations
in helping during crisis situations and supporting post-crisis recovery
processes in their countries of origin is only one example of their
positive contribution.
71. In recent years, diaspora associations have been active in
developing civil society in many European and other countries. Diaspora
communities play an important role in the adaptation of migrants
to the social, cultural and political environments of their host
countries. They also act as lobby groups for the interests of migrant
communities. At the same time, diaspora members bring the democratic
experience with civil society organisations of their host countries
back to their countries of origin. Thus, they help in the development
of social, humanitarian, educational and cultural sectors and help
to promote democratic values, norms and practices.
72. With the development of new information technologies, the
role of diaspora associations has become even more important, as
it creates new ways for these groups to contribute to their countries
of origin without physically having to return there.
73. Diaspora associations also provide an opportunity for empowerment
of migrant women. In the last decades, there has been a global trend
in terms of feminisation of migration and many migrant women are joining
or even creating diaspora associations to keep closer ties with
their countries of origin. The Platform of Women of the Congolese
Diaspora of Belgium, is one such diaspora associations, which became
the first winner of the European Diaspora Prize awarded by the Parliamentary
Network on Diaspora Policies of the Assembly in 2019 for its work
on the integration of migrant women in Belgium.
74. The significant potential of diaspora members is often overlooked
by decision makers. Diaspora representatives are rarely consulted
on matters relating to their activities; diaspora associations are
frequently excluded from official funding programmes in the context
of civil initiatives; there is a lack of information on different
diaspora initiatives and on their different forms of contribution;
there are a number of legal limitations to diasporas’ involvement
which could be easily lifted.
75. On the other side, diaspora communities are very diverse and
have different needs and, in some countries are very numerous. There
is still a lack of co-operation between “old” diaspora organisations
and newly arrived migrant organisations. Also, co-operation between
diaspora associations is often insufficient or even replaced by
competition over influence with authorities and the limited resources
available.
76. Therefore, the development of strategic partnerships between
States, civil society, the private sector and international organisations
to create a framework for diaspora empowerment to facilitate the
transfer of resources and knowledge sharing, should be a primary
task for the development of the European diaspora policy.
77. To facilitate this process, member States can promote special
platforms on social media to connect with diaspora populations,
both in countries of origin and host counties, and organise open
online platforms for all diaspora-related projects and initiatives
for the co-ordinated and effective cultural, voluntary or philanthropic engagement
of diaspora members.
78. Diaspora communities should be encouraged to organise themselves
in regional/inter-regional networks and establish appropriate mechanisms
that will enable their enhanced participation in social and political
life of both their countries of origin and their host countries.
79. The State authorities can benefit from close co-operation
with diaspora associations and should therefore ensure necessary
conditions for better empowerment of diasporas. Public authorities,
at national, regional and local levels, as well as international
organisations, should take into account good practices and experiences
aimed at enhancing relations with diaspora associations, as well
as carry out regular and rigorous evaluations of diaspora engagement
strategies and thereby endeavour to foster a culture of critical
reflection and constructive reform in this area.
80. National and international donors should discourage competition
for access to resources among diaspora representative organisations
and support partnerships and networks of organisations which co-operate
effectively and leverage each other in order to obtain practical
results.
81. Accessibility to consular services is the key to institutional
and administrative contact between diaspora residing in the host
countries and the institutions of the country of origin. The more
effective and accessible these services, the better can diaspora
representatives fully enjoy their rights and duties when living
abroad. Diaspora should feel a sense of belonging in both the country
of origin and in the country of residence.
82. The experiences of countries such as Portugal, Georgia, Ireland,
Poland and Ukraine show the potential of diaspora communities for
mobilising public opinion in the host countries and creating a positive
image of the country of origin abroad.
4.3.1. Promotion
of intercultural dialogue
83. Policies and strategies aimed
at promoting intercultural dialogue between the host countries and
the countries of origin have already been developed. The essential
task is to promote transnational resources, modernise the link between
national institutions and diaspora, invest in economic, social,
educational and cultural exchanges and emphasise the importance
and amplify the role of diaspora communities around the world. It
is from the viewpoint of “recognition” and not “paternalism” that
initiatives should be promoted by and with diaspora.
84. The exercise of citizenship, representativeness of communities,
solidarity with diaspora communities around the world, investment,
entrepreneurship and internationalisation will help keep alive the
culture and foster intercultural dialogue between diasporas and
host countries.
85. Some countries have signed bilateral agreements supporting
the integration process for migrants, which facilitate the study
of the language, culture and legal procedures existing in the receiving
countries. On the other hand, policies promoting the study of the
native language, culture, historical heritage, religion, traditions and
customs are indispensable for maintaining the national identity
of diasporas.
86. The governments should recognise the significance of cultural
identity for diaspora members and support diaspora’s initiatives
aimed at maintaining the cultural links with their countries of
origin. A legal framework for granting support in promoting the
language and culture, social inclusion, training and professional
development should be created.
87. The development of a plural identity and of cultural links
with the country of origin builds the basis for successful integration
of migrants. The challenge to preserve links with the country of
origin is especially felt by the youth of second and third generation
migrants. Diaspora networks and associations, supported by the authorities,
have an important role to play in this regard.
88. The media has a major role to play in the promotion of political
and cultural diversity and in the cohesion and awareness of diasporas.
To counter stereotypes portraying migrants as victims or criminals,
the media should provide more opportunities for migrants to speak
about their success stories, and to present the intellectual and
economic potential of migrants as a benefit for their host countries
and their countries of origin. Media in host countries dedicated
to diasporas play a major role that needs to be recognised and supported.
5. Good
practices
5.1. Portugal
89. Portugal is one of the countries
which since the beginning of its new-found democracy, in April 1974,
has always followed and supported the Portuguese diaspora with a
number of political and administrative instruments, in order to
recognise the importance and dignity of diaspora for the country.
In this sense, in 1974, during the first democratic government,
the Office of the Secretary of State of Emigration was created,
under the supervision of the Ministry of Labour. Only one year later,
in July 1975, the Secretary of State of Emigration was transferred
to the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, where it
currently remains. Today, it is the Office of the Secretary of State
of the Portuguese Communities, that is responsible for public policy
relating to the Portuguese diaspora, namely promotion of the Portuguese
language and education in Portuguese, consular services, support
for associations, programmes to involve Portuguese entrepreneurs
abroad and cultural policies.
90. In fact, relations with the diaspora is one of the main vectors
of Portuguese foreign policy, together with relations with the European
Union, transatlantic relations, co-operation with the Portuguese
language speakers, the internationalisation of the economy and culture
and the promotion of multilateralism.
91. On the other hand, the Portuguese diaspora deserves constitutional
consideration. In the Portuguese Constitution, Article 14, concerns
“The Portuguese Abroad”, and establishes that Portuguese citizens
living abroad have the protection of the State for the exercise
of their rights and they are also submitted to duties not incompatible
with their absence from the country.
92. Is this sense, it is of major importance for the relationship
which exists with the diaspora that since the beginning of Portugal’s
new democracy in 1974 the legislators decided to give parliamentary
representation to Portuguese citizens living abroad, with 4 members
elected to the parliament to represent Portugal’s diaspora in the
world, 2 persons representing the diaspora in Europe and 2 outside
of Europe. In this context, Portuguese abroad also have the right
to vote for the Portuguese Parliament since 1975 and the President
of the Republic since 2001, and also take part in referenda. They
can also vote for members of the European Parliament, even if they
live outside the space of the European Union. Since 2018, all those
in possession of a Portuguese identity card, living abroad, are
automatically entitled to the right to vote in elections.
93. The government also created a consultative body of the government,
composed of 60 directly elected members, called the Council of the
Portuguese Communities, representing Portuguese citizens spread
all over the world. There is also specific financial support given
to Portuguese diaspora entrepreneurs to invest in Portugal, and
financial support also to the activities of diaspora associations.
5.2. Georgia
94. Georgia, as an example, has
well-developed global diaspora communities accounting for 5 million people.
According to official statistics, there are over 300 Georgian diaspora
organisations abroad. The Georgian authorities, with the assistance
of international organisations active in the area, have developed
a comprehensive diaspora strategy. Since 2018, the Constitution
of Georgia contains a provision on State care for maintaining and
developing connections with diasporas. Both the government and the
parliament have special organs within their structures dedicated
to diaspora-related policies.
5.3. Italy
95. Italy being a country welcoming
a wide range of migrant and diaspora communities, has made several important
steps to ensure better co-operation between diasporas and national
and local authorities. In 2014 it adopted Law n.125,
on international development co-operation,
which created the conditions to allow diaspora associations to actively
participate in development policies. In addition, ad hoc bodies
have been set up in order to enable and facilitate dialogue with
diaspora organisations and associations.
96. With the aim of its implementation, the Italian Government
created the National Summit of diasporas, an annual meeting between
the members of the institutions, foundations and associations working
on diaspora related projects. Diaspora organisations and associations
also participate in economic development and they can collaborate
with civil society organisations and/or local authorities.
97. Speaking about the Italian policy towards its citizens abroad,
specific provisions were included in the Italian legislation to
ensure the possibility for Italian diaspora to contribute to the
development of their home country.
98. Italian citizens living abroad for more than 12 months can
register in the AIRE (Register of Italians living abroad). It is
managed by the municipalities on the basis of data and information
furnished by the consular representations abroad and it is a prerequisite
for the use of a range of services provided by consular representations
and for the exercise of important rights (such as the right to vote).
According to the law of 16 August 1992 n. 91, the acquisition of
a foreign nationality does not mean the loss of Italian nationality,
unless the Italian citizen formally renounces it.
99. The law of 27 December 2001 n. 459 allows Italian citizens
living abroad a right to postal vote in parliamentary elections
and in referenda. On the contrary, the same possibility is not provided
in local and regional elections; in this case, Italian legislation
is limited to facilitating the return to Italy in order to take
part in elections.
100. The law of 6 November 1989 n. 368 created the General Council
of Italians Abroad (Consiglio Generale Italiani all’estero). It
is the highest representative body of expatriate Italians and its
main function is to inform the government and the parliament on
the major issues and concerns of the Italian communities in the
world. In addition, the Committees of the Italians abroad are bodies
representing Italians abroad in the context of relations with diplomatic-consular
representations. Created in 1985, they now have 101 elective committees and
5 nominated by the consulates (47 are in Europe, 42 in the Americas,
10 in Asia and Oceania and 7 in Africa). Furthermore, on 27 November
2019 a bill was presented for the establishment of a Bicameral Parliamentary
Commission on emigration and mobility of Italians in the world.
5.4. Spain
101. In Spain, between 2008 and
2014, almost three million people left the country to look for a
job or better opportunities, most of them young people. In contrast
to previous migratory flows, those migrating in this period were
highly skilled professionals. Their countries of destination were
the United Kingdom, France, the United States, Germany and Switzerland.
102. The Secretary General of Immigration and Emigration (SGIE)
promotes cultural links and educational programmes for young diaspora
members. Through its Youth programme it provides grants to young
people for training and career guidance, language learning and return
programmes.
103. The SGIE also supports mobility projects aimed at reducing
unemployment in the country. It established on-line information
on job opportunities abroad for unemployed young people by providing
information on job opportunities, work and accommodation possibilities
in different countries. It offers information on international agreements
relating to youth mobility, double citizenship, recognition of diplomas,
taxation, etc. It funds projects through the diplomatic missions
for NGOs and diaspora associations helping Spanish citizens integrate
in their host countries. Many of them target young Spanish migrants,
supporting their training or social integration or return back to
Spain. Spain also signed more than 20 bilateral agreements with
host countries on the portability of social security benefits.
5.5. Turkey
104. Starting in the 1960s, Turkey signed
a number of labour agreements with various European countries, which
resulted in the creation of a Turkish diaspora in Europe when many
Turkish workers migrated to European countries. Though Turkish workers
initially did not consider permanently settling in their host countries,
gradually they began the process of integration.. Family reunification
allowed many Turkish family members to reunite in the host countries,
which laid down the foundations for the Turkish diaspora which now numbers
almost seven million, the majority of whom are living in European
countries.
105. Turkey has a diaspora policy which considers integration as
a two-way process in which migrants and host country governments
have responsibilities in encouraging active participation. To this
end, Turkish diaspora policy encourages the active participation
of the Turkish community in the social, economic, cultural and political
life of host countries while maintaining their ties to the motherland.
Support is given to education in the mother tongue and cultural
activities are encouraged. In co-operation with host countries,
Turkey provides Turkish language and culture teachers, as well as
religious officers who are assigned by the Presidency of Religious
Affairs and who perform religious services for the benefit of the
Turkish community and help them accomplish their religious duties.
106. In 2010, the Presidency for Turks Abroad and Related Communities
(YTB) was established with the purpose of responding to the challenges
faced by Turkish diaspora members, facilitating their links with
their homeland and their integration within host countries. YTB
aims to protect the family structure, socio-cultural values of the
Turkish diaspora and to support civil society activities in these
fields.
107. In 2012, the Turkish Parliament adopted an amendment to the
Election Law which enabled Turkish citizens living abroad, for the
first time to cast their votes in the 2014 presidential election.
108. Turkey also gives importance to easy access of its diaspora
members to consular services, having 248 diplomatic missions (embassies,
consulate generals, permanent missions) abroad. This also allows Turkey
the opportunity to support its diaspora community, in particular
in the fields of education and social services. The legal advisors
working at the Turkish Embassies and Consulate Generals provide
Turkish citizens living abroad with free legal assistance on a variety
of issues and problems, primarily linked to any kind of discrimination
they may face.
6. Conclusions
109. Diasporas by their nature are
actively involved in globalism, cosmopolitanism and multi-culturalism. They
make a positive contribution to the societies in which they live
and through their dynamism can be at the forefront of new developments
including new technologies. Countries can benefit even more from
what diasporas can offer if they work closely with relevant stakeholders
including diasporas and their associations, authorities from the
host countries, of countries of origin, as well as local authorities,
non-governmental actors and others. Diasporas and their organisations
can only play a positive role when the authorities of the countries concerned
engage with them, examine and respond to their needs, include them
in decision-making processes and co-operate with them in formulating
diaspora-oriented policies. The recommendations provided in this report
can facilitate the development of such policies and strategies by
member States and these policies can be promoted further through
international co-operation on diaspora related issues.
110. Integration of diaspora should be promoted via democratic
participation, access to education and the labour market, and strong
dialogue between the host countries, diaspora and countries of origin.
The Council of Europe can play a major role in this process by bringing
together the multiple actors that shape national diaspora policies,
including parliaments, governments, diaspora associations, NGOs,
media and research organisations, and establish a European Forum
of Diasporas as a platform for international exchanges between different
diaspora communities.