Print
See related documents

Report | Doc. 14511 | 12 March 2018

Modification of the Assembly’s Rules of Procedure: the impact of the budgetary crisis on the list of working languages of the Assembly

Committee on Rules of Procedure, Immunities and Institutional Affairs

Rapporteur : Ms Petra De SUTTER, Belgium, SOC

Origin - Reference to committee: Reference 4355 of 22 January 2018. 2018 - March Standing Committee

Summary

The draconian reduction in the Parliamentary Assembly's budget for 2018 and 2019, as a consequence, among other things, of the Turkish decision to revert to its initial status of ordinary contributor to the Council of Europe budget, calls for drastic measures. The first of these is to no longer cover out of the Assembly's budget the cost of interpretation in Turkish in plenary sittings and in committee meetings. Indeed, in 2015, the Assembly made the introduction of Turkish as a working language in the Assembly strictly conditional on the Committee of Minister’s decision to allocate to it in the biennial budget for 2016-2017 and in subsequent budgets the necessary and adequate corresponding financial allocations.

The budgetary difficulties of the Assembly have been amplified by the decisions taken by the Committee of Ministers to maintain a strict zero nominal growth policy for 2018 and 2019, and the refusal of the Russian Federation to pay the first third of its contribution to the 2018 budget.

The draft recommendation presented by the Committee on Rules of Procedure, Immunities and Institutional Affairs invites the Committee of Ministers to meet its obligations and to defend the Council of Europe.

A. Draft resolution 
			(1) 
			Draft resolution adopted
by the committee on 9 March 2018.

(open)

B. Draft recommendation 
			(2) 
			Draft recommendation
adopted by the committee on 9 March 2018.

(open)

C. Explanatory memorandum by Ms Petra De Sutter, rapporteur

(open)

Appendix – Dissenting opinion 
			(4) 
			Rule 50.4
of the Assembly’s Rules of Procedure: “The report of a committee
shall also contain an explanatory memorandum by the rapporteur.
The committee shall take note of it. Any dissenting opinions expressed
in the committee shall be included therein at the request of their
authors, preferably in the body of the explanatory memorandum, but otherwise
in an appendix or footnote.” by Mr Şaban Dişli (Turkey, EPP/CD), member of the committee

(open)