1. Introduction
1. Children are among the most
vulnerable groups of migrants and asylum seekers and are therefore particularly
in need of protection against violence, sexual abuse, trafficking
and exploitation. When Europol stated in 2016 that approximately
10 000 registered child migrants were missing in Europe,
calls for their protection were
high on the political agenda. Nevertheless, action to protect refugee
and migrant children remains insufficient. It is estimated that
a child goes missing in Europe nearly every two minutes
and that one registered migrant
child is reported missing or dead every day globally.
2. These realities prompted me to table a motion for a resolution
on missing refugee and migrant children in Europe in 2017 (
Doc. 14417). Once designated as rapporteur on this subject, I submitted
a questionnaire to the European Centre for Parliamentary Research
and Documentation (ECPRD - Request n° 4067), in order to receive
more information about national action. I am very grateful for the
replies to this request which are summarised in document AS/Mig/Inf(2019)12
and are taken into account in this report. The high number of replies
shows that national parliaments take this subject seriously, which
is encouraging and has been reflected in the conclusions of this
report.
3. I also appreciated that ECPRD contacts from non-member States
replied. Nearly all refugees and migrants in Europe arrive from
non-European countries. The plight of missing refugees and migrants
has a global dimension.
It is therefore useful and necessary
to co-operate with non-European countries and exchange experience
and information, in particular as the disappearance of refugee and
migrant children often happens when they move between countries.
4. Based on my experience in my own country, I have described
the situation in Turkey in document AS/Mig/Inf(2019)11. Before I
began work on the present report and in the framework of a committee
report on integration, empowerment and protection of migrant children
through compulsory education (
Doc.
14524), the committee held, in December 2017, on my proposal,
a hearing with experts from Turkey on educational structures in
Turkey for primary-age refugee children in Turkey. In a related
context, in March 2018 I also had the opportunity to make a presentation
to the committee about the situation of Rohingya refugees in Myanmar. I
hope that other members will also analyse and bear witness to the
situation in their respective countries, in order to better devise
adequate policies and action to protect refugee and migrant children
and to reduce the alarming numbers going missing.
2. Categories of missing refugee and migrant
children
5. For the purpose of this report,
a child is considered missing when his or her whereabouts are unknown by
parents or guardians, school authorities or employers as well as
public authorities competent for registering or supervising the
child. When children go missing it is most likely that their rights
are endangered or violated. As national parliamentarians, we cannot
remain indifferent to such human tragedy, but must take positive political
action in our constituencies and countries and seek synergies at
European level.
6. Missing refugee and migrant children are not a homogeneous
group. There may be various reasons for their disappearance as well
as different vulnerabilities. This makes it very difficult to analyse
this phenomenon and draw conclusions leading to concrete political
and legal initiatives to protect refugee and migrant children from
going missing. Depending on the circumstances, different or multiple
action will be necessary. In my report I try to distinguish the
main characteristics of missing refugee and migrant children which
have led to their disappearance.
2.1. Age
categories
7. The United Nations Convention
on the Rights of the Child defines a child in its Article 1 as “every
human being below the age of eighteen years unless, under the law
applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier”. This definition
is generally applied by all member States as regards refugees and
migrants. However, the UN Convention also recognises that children
below eighteen years of age require different protection according
to their age, maturity and capacities.
8. Article 5 of this convention stipulates, for instance, that
“States Parties shall respect the responsibilities, rights and duties
of parents (…) to provide, in a manner consistent with the evolving
capacities of the child, appropriate direction and guidance in the
exercise by the child of the rights recognised in the present Convention.”
If the responsibilities, rights and duties of parents to provide
appropriate direction and guidance in the exercise of children’s
rights by their child is dependent on these “evolving capacities”,
when children are alone, member States must provide this guidance,
and adopt age-adequate approaches to refugee and migrant children.
This applies to situations where children are at risk of going missing,
as well as when they have been located and placed under protection.
9. Likewise, Article 12 (1) of the UN Convention on the Rights
of the Child requires that “States Parties shall assure to the child,
who is capable of forming his or her own views, the right to express
those views freely in all matters affecting the child, the views
of the child being given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity
of the child.” Therefore, member States must distinguish their action
affecting refugee and migrant children, depending on this “age and
maturity”, and policies and action to prevent refugee and migrant
children going missing should take into account the different motivations
and risks related to age. Services dealing with refugee and migrant
children who are found after going missing should include staff
trained in care for children of different ages and with different
capacities of understanding and expression.
10. Care must be taken to provide protection and support which
is appropriate to the age and capacities of refugee and migrant
children, as well as being specific to the gender of the children
concerned, especially protecting girls from the risk of gender-based
violence and abuse.
2.2. Accompanied
and unaccompanied minors
11. If accompanied minors go missing,
their family will generally contact the police, except in cases
of family involvement in mistreatment or neglect. Unaccompanied
minors are more vulnerable in this respect, as their disappearance
may go unnoticed if they are not cared for within formal structures,
or depends on mechanisms of alert through guardians or other designated
officials in contact with the police. It is therefore important
to distinguish between accompanied and unaccompanied refugee and
migrant children.
12. States’ duties to respect and ensure the rights of all persons
within their territory and jurisdiction include on the one hand
respecting a family’s rights in relation to a dead or missing child,
and on the other hand, protecting their rights in the country where
they are living. The most relevant rights for families in relation
to missing children (included dead children) include the right to
participate in an investigation, the right to know if their child
has died, the right to family and private life, including in relation
to burial, the right of children to special protection, protection
from inhuman or degrading treatment; and the right to reparation.
These rights should apply equally, of course, in the context of
migration and migrants.
13. The number of refugee and migrant children in Europe is very
high. In 2017, the UN Department of Economics and Social Affairs
counted 1 404 194 refugee and migrant children in Turkey, 894 851
in the United Kingdom, 797 981 in the Russian Federation, 777 919
in Germany, 717 632 in France, 648 374 in Spain and 603 806 in Italy.
14. Looking at new asylum applications in the European Union between
January and December 2018, UNICEF estimated
that
there were 191 360 child applicants, of whom 20 325 were unaccompanied
and separated minors. They mostly applied in Germany (78 270 child
applications), France (24 145 child applications) and Greece (21 770
child applications). However, not all minors apply for asylum, because
some countries also grant them subsidiary or humanitarian protection
and do not return unaccompanied minors to their countries of origin.
15. Unaccompanied minors constitute a high percentage of all refugee
and migrant children in Europe. They accounted for 83% of the children
who arrived in Italy in 2018, 81% in Spain and 14% in Greece.
At a meeting of the committee in
April 2019, Ms Paula Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik presented and updated her
European Migration Network (EMN) study on unaccompanied minors with
international protection status in Germany, which showed that 90 %
of the unaccompanied minors who had applied for asylum were male
and between 16 and 17 years old, mostly from Afghanistan, Somalia
and Guinea.
2.3. Voluntary
and involuntary disappearance
16. Statistical information does
not really exist in this field, which makes it difficult to understand
the intensity of the problem. In the framework of the preparation
of the report on “Pushback policies and practice in Council of Europe
member States” (
Doc.
14909), my colleague Mr Domagoj Hajduković reported to the
committee in March 2019, that 3500 out of 5900 applications for
asylum launched since 2014 in Croatia had been withdrawn due to
the disappearance of the applicants, which meant that more than
two thirds of the applicants had absconded moving probably on to
other EU countries.
17. In the latter cases, emergency help or hotlines would only
be contacted by a child, if a voluntary action became involuntary
over time. For such a process, for example, information and awareness-raising
could be as vital as protection measures for victims of human trafficking.
The preparation of
Resolution
2280 (2019) on the situation of refugees and migrants on Greek islands
by Ms Petra De Sutter
drastically showed the brutal strategies
used to force migrants including children into exploitation in the
Reception and Identification Centre at Moria on the island of Lesbos.
18. Taking into account the best interests of the child in cases
of voluntary or involuntary disappearance, measures for the security
of the child should be taken with special attention to the child’s
psychology and the state’s child protection systems are activated.
19. Therefore, measures for the protection of children from going
missing must take into account that a certain percentage would voluntarily
initiate, or contribute to, their disappearance from a host family,
guardian, school, employer or other established situation. Such
a voluntary disappearance may rapidly turn into an involuntary one
through exploitation and abuse.
2.4. Registered
and undocumented minors
20. Undocumented or clandestine
migrants are extremely vulnerable, because they live outside the
law and thus without protection by the law. From 2007-2009, the
EU funded the research project CLANDESTINO, which estimated between
3.8 and 1.9 million irregular foreign residents in the EU in 2008.
The tremendous increase in arrivals
of migrants and refugees in 2015 and 2016 most likely increased
the number of undocumented minors in Europe.
21. When the committee heard Ms Agnès Callamard, Special Rapporteur
of the UN Human Rights Council on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary
executions, in September 2018, she told the committee that statistics
on dead migrants would only mirror the tip of the iceberg. Given
the dangerous situation migrants had to face in most countries of
transit outside Europe, it can be assumed that many more migrants
perish or go missing before they are finally registered in a country
in Europe. As they were often not registered before, their death or
disappearance remains unnoticed. This constitutes an enormous human
tragedy for the many victims and their families, but also for our
human society as a whole.
22. Associated Press journalists recently estimated the numbers
of deceased migrants much higher than the figures of the United
Nations, by counting anonymous burials and referring to local sources.
The ICRC held at Milan University
in November 2013 a conference on the management and identification
of unidentified decedents with an emphasis on dead migrants, which
was followed up by subsequent seminars.
The recommendations proposed at
that time have not had a measurable impact yet. The International
Organisation for Migration (IOM) of the United Nations published
in 2019 an Analysis of Best Practices on the Identification of Missing
Migrants.
3. National
action
23. Through the ECPRD (see paragraph
2 above), I asked national parliamentary research departments the following
three questions: (1) How many refugee and migrant children are missing
in your country? (2) If a refugee or migrant child disappears, who
(e.g. authority, accommodation centre, school, employer, guardian, host
family) is legally obliged to notify such disappearance to the police?
(3) How are refugee and migrant children registered and identified
in your country?
24. The replies indicated that most countries were able to provide
figures of missing refugees and migrants. Some countries had also
specific action for missing refugee and migrant children. However,
member States were obviously far from having mutually coordinated
approaches and an effective co-operation across national borders.
25. While national authorities typically depend on cross-border
co-operation and mutual legal assistance
regarding missing refugees and migrants,
it is clear that those national authorities must do their own homework at
first, because they bear primary responsibility for protecting refugee
and migrant children from going missing in the first place.
4. International
action
4.1. United
Nations
26. While there is no specific
body of the United Nations dealing with missing refugee and migrant
children, several specialised UN bodies pursue also action for them
or related action. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
creates obligations for States Parties. Refugee and migrant children
are fully entitled to those fundamental rights. The child’s best
interest is generally the yard stick which measures national action concerning
a child.
27. The Missing Migrants Project of the International Organization
for Migration (IOM) collects statistical data on refugees and migrants
who have gone missing or died.
Although those figures might be
the tip of the iceberg only, this statistical information is an
important indicator for policy-makers. For the purpose of this report,
age categories should be identified in such data as well as other
potential vulnerabilities such as gender, disabilities and health
problems. In this regard, the IOM publication Fatal Journeys Volume
4: Missing Migrant Children is of particular interest.
28. UNHCR produced in 1988 its Guidelines on Protection of Refugee
Children and Care
and publishes regularly data on
refugee and migrant children in Europe, together with IOM and UNICEF.
Besides policy and advocacy work,
UNICEF is running projects for Syrian refugee children, for instance
in the Middle East and Turkey.
29. Created in 1995, the UN Inter-agency Working Group on Unaccompanied
and Separated Children (IAWG-UASC)
produced a Toolkit
and a Field Handbook
on Unaccompanied and Separated Children, both
of which provide useful guidance to international stakeholders as
well as national authorities alike.
4.2. Interpol
30. On 6 September 2019, Mr Cyril
Gout, Assistant Director of Forensics and Police Data Management
of Interpol informed the committee about Interpol’s “Yellow Notices”
which are global police alerts for missing persons which are published
for victims of parental abductions, criminal abductions or unexplained disappearances.
They can be made public via the
Interpol website, where 7207 public Yellow Notices are currently
in circulation.
This tool is not specific for migrants
or refugees, but obviously of significance in finding those missing.
In addition, Interpol publishes Black Notices with the data of unidentified
corpses. Such notices can help clarifying the fate of missing persons.
This work is carried out in accordance with the data processing policy
on refugees adopted by the Interpol General Assembly in 2017.
Finally, the database of Stolen
and Lost Travel Documents may be of help in identifying missing
child migrants.
4.3. European
Union
31. The European Union’s Fundamental
Rights Agency (FRA) produced the publication “Guardianship for children
deprived of parental care – A handbook to reinforce guardianship
systems to cater for the specific needs of child victims of trafficking”.
The EU’s Frontex published the “VEGA
Handbook: Children at airports, Children at risk on the move – Guidelines
for border guards”.
Data on migrants within the EU are
produced by the EU’s Eurostat.
32. FRA also provides monthly overviews of the fundamental rights
situation (including missing children) of people arriving in those
Member States that have been particularly affected by large migration
movements and has issued opinions on the respect of children’s rights
in the context of migration and legislative proposals.
33. The problem of missing unaccompanied migrant children was
identified as a priority in the EU Action Plan on Unaccompanied
minors (2010-2014),
which triggered various legislative
initiatives (including the reform of the EU asylum package) and
funding being made available to support EU agencies and other organisations
dealing with this issue. As of 2017, with the support of the European
Commission and the EU agencies, the member States are encouraged
to: a) collect and exchange comparable data to facilitate the cross-border
tracing of missing children and the verification of family links;
b) apply child-friendly and gender-sensitive approaches when collecting
fingerprints and biometric data; c) ensure that a person responsible
for child protection is present at an early stage of the identification
and registration phase and that child protection officers are appointed
in each hotspot; d) put in place the necessary procedures and protocols
to systematically report and respond to all instances of unaccompanied
children going missing.
34. The EU co-funded and launched in 2014 together with Missing
Children Europe the project SUMMIT (Safeguarding Unaccompanied Migrant
Minors from going Missing by Identifying Best Practices and Training Actors
on Interagency Cooperation), which is trying to identify best practices
in member States to prevent disappearances.
Among the results of the SUMMIT
project were guidelines for professionals dealing with migrant children,
as well as, for instance, a publication entitled “Lost in Migration:
Working together to protect children from disappearances, from European
priorities to local realities”,
which brings together good practices
from different European cities aimed to avoid children going missing,
including policies for early integration, support extending beyond
the age of 18, involvement of civil society, etc.
35. Through the EU Schengen Information System (SIS), an alert
on a missing person is made available to police officers and border
guards in all EU and Schengen countries participating in SIS.
The NGO Amber Alert advocated including
preventive alerts (for children who are at risk of abduction or
are particularly in danger of being harmed if they go missing) in
the SIS for missing children.
36. The European Parliament addressed the disappearance of migrant
children in several resolutions in 2014 and 2016.
The
texts called twice on the European Commission to ensure that unaccompanied
minors do not disappear, and to design a strategy for that purpose
and for finding the whereabouts of missing children. Key recurring
oral questions have related to measures to be taken to prevent children
from going missing from the asylum system, to improve the reporting
of child disappearances, and how it supports member States in relocating
more children from Greece and Italy. In November 2017, the Civil
Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Committee of the European Parliament
voted to include preventive alerts for children at high risk of
going missing in the SIS system.
4.4. Red
Cross and Red Crescent
37. The International Committee
of the Red Cross (ICRC) has a long tradition of reuniting missing
and separated persons. Its action ranges from practical action,
such as helping unaccompanied child refugees reunite with their
families in Nigeria,
to policy recommendations.
In May 2019, the ICRC contributed
to a specific session of the Hellenic Parliament on humanitarian
and legal issues concerning the fate of the missing migrants.
Through the Red Cross and Red Crescent
societies and movements, the ICRC can help in many countries when
refugee and migrant children are missing.
38. The Turkish Red Crescent Restoring Family Links (RFL)
Programme is organised by the International Red
Cross and Red Crescent Movement and implemented by Red Cross and
Red Crescent national societies in co-operation with the International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Its vocation is to trace missing people
and reunite separated families. The ICRC and national societies
form the global Family Links Network, which coordinates the tracing
of missing people, communication of family messages, family reunification
as well as co-operation with the relevant authorities and institutions.
In Turkey, the Red Crescent has established national mechanisms
and frameworks in co-operation with the Ministry of the Interior,
the Ministry of Defence and other stakeholders to regulate and facilitate
the collective and coordinated work on solving individual applications
and referrals submitted by partners. The RFL has observed a sharp
increase in situations of natural disasters or emergencies resulting
in mass population movements over the last years which does not show
signs of improvement.
4.5. Non-governmental
organisations
39. Among the non-governmental
organisations helping to find missing children, Missing Children
Europe has done specific work on missing refugee and migrant children.
Missing Children Europe defines missing refugee and migrant children
as ‘minors that are registered with state authorities and go missing
from the reception centres provided for them after their registration’.
They may be unaccompanied or separated,
but also children in families.
40. Its president, Ms Maud De Boer-Buquicchio, Special Rapporteur
of the UN Human Rights Council on the sale and sexual exploitation
of children, including child prostitution, child pornography and
other child sexual abuse material, addressed the committee in June
2018. She outlined the need to increase international co-operation,
because refugee and migrant children were particularly inclined
to cross borders also within Europe. In addition, it was necessary
to provide them with easily reachable helplines and protection,
which they could use in confidence without fear of being exposed
to perceived risks to them, for instance regarding their migration
status. Missing Children Europe established 19 hotlines across Europe.
41. Missing Children Europe initiated in May 2017 the project
AMINA (Safeguarding Migrant Children across Europe). Amina in Arabic
means the “safe one”. The project aims to close the protection gaps
that lead to the disappearance and exploitation of children in migration
in Europe. It provides children with access to information on the
rights they are entitled to and on the opportunities and services
they can access in different countries in the EU, for instance through
the development of “MINIILA”, a smartphone application, which providing
useful information (hostels, support centres, services, etc.) to
migrant and refugee children in the European Union.
The project involves 12 organisations
from 7 different EU countries, including The Smile of the Child
(Greece), Missing People (UK), Centre Français de Protection de
l’Enfance and La Mouette (France), Child Focus and Médécins du Monde
(Belgium and France). Its aim is to improve procedures for managing cases
of disappearance, trafficking and exploitation of minors at both
cross-border and horizontal levels.
42. Child Rescue
is a pilot project that aims at
raising awareness and is exploring two different projects in Greece,
which is coordinated by Smile of the Child, and in Belgium, coordinated
by Child Focus. Together with Missing Children Europe and the ICRC,
these organisations launched an application and platform managed
by the Red Cross to inform publicly about the search for missing
children.
43. Following an European Commission decision of February 2007,
the 116 000 European hotline for missing children
was established, operating through
local grassroots organisations in 31 countries in Europe, under
the coordination of Missing Children Europe. It provides free and
immediate emotional, psychological, social, legal and administrative
support 24/7. It includes unaccompanied missing children of third-country
origin in certain countries.
44. AMBER Alert Europe is an international NGO with 22 members
(law enforcement, ministries and NGOs) in 16 countries. Its police
network consists of over 35 experts representing law enforcement
from 12 EU countries. Although the network is designed to search
for all missing children, its international network lends itself
to seeking missing migrant children and its results appear encouraging.
45. Also in other parts of the world, migrant children are at
risk. For instance, a publication by Save the Children addresses
child refugees in South East Asia.
Europe may learn from those examples.
4.6. Council
of Europe
46. Two Council of Europe legal
treaties are particularly relevant in this context: the Convention
on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings of 2005 (CETS No.
197) as well as the Convention on the Protection of Children against
Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse of 2007 (CETS No. 201). Both
conventions have set up intergovernmental committees for monitoring
the respective obligations by their parties. The Directorate General
of Democracy of the Council of Europe serves both conventional committees
and pursues projects for assisting member States in this respect.
47. Through the adoption of
Resolution
2136 (2016) on harmonising the protection of unaccompanied minors
in Europe, the Assembly urged member States in particular to:
- ensure that national police
forces co-operate to constitute reliable, comprehensive and regularly
updated databases on unaccompanied children who go missing, involving
Europol and Frontex in investigations against criminal groups that
might harm and exploit unaccompanied children;
- fully co-operate in efforts to track missing children
and to support the further development of the Schengen Information
System (SIS);
- assure protection of children from trafficking and criminal
activities to which they are particularly vulnerable and step up
co-operation with the countries of origin and transit in this area;
- prevent unaccompanied migrant children from going missing,
ensuring that responsibilities are transferred seamlessly during
the different stages of the procedure, from reception to integration
of migrant minors, in order to minimise the risk of unaccompanied
minors “slipping through the gaps” in protection and absconding.
48. In the field of child protection, the Assembly actively follows
and supports or even initiates action by the Council of Europe,
such as the Parliamentary Campaign to End Immigration Detention
of Children, which ended in June 2019 and had contributed to the
Global Campaign to End Child Detention.
49. In addition, the Assembly addressed clandestine migration
in
Recommendation 1211
(1993) on “clandestine migration: traffickers and employers
of clandestine migrants”, which recommended to the Committee of
Ministers to “draw up a convention designed to combat clandestine
immigration in all its forms, with provision for penalties for traffickers
and employers of illegal immigrants, and drawing upon the provisions of
Resolution 1983/30 of the United Nations Economic and Social Council
on the suppression of the traffic in persons and of the exploitation
of the prostitution of others and
Resolution 1991/35 on the suppression of the traffic in persons.”
50. Together with the Fundamental Rights Agency of the EU, the
Council of Europe published a Handbook on European law relating
to the rights of the child
and a Handbook on European law relating
to asylum, borders and immigration.
5. Conclusions
51. The registration and identification
of refugee and migrant children, whether they are in possession
of identity documents or not, are a necessary condition for guaranteeing
the capacity to take note of their disappearance and initiate searches.
This is particularly important in the case of migrant street children,
who are even more exposed to exploitation and mistreatment than
those residing in organised accommodation.
52. Improving the conditions for registered refugee and migrant
children will help avoiding that they go intentionally missing.
This includes adequate guardianship, housing, healthcare, schooling
or employment as well as assistance in finding their family members.
53. Like most refugees and migrants, children make use of smugglers
in order to reach safe countries of destination. This fact exposes
them to organised crime and the related risks. The high sums to
be paid to smugglers have to be generated by those smuggled. Children
normally have little financial resources and, as child labour is
prohibited, they are generally excluded from earning such high sums
through other means than illegal employment, prostitution or criminal
activities such as drug dealing. Missing children thus become perpetrators
of crime as well as victims. The latter activities seem to favour
an undocumented or clandestine status.
54. The identification of deceased persons including children
serves at least two important purposes: to inform the family of
the deceased, and to inform the public about the deadly risks of
such persons in order to prevent similar cases from occurring in
the future again.
55. Given the importance and urgency of this subject, a multitude
of political recommendations might spring to mind. However, this
report shall focus on those where the Council of Europe can be of
added value due to its existing work. In addition, the parliamentary
dimension of relevant work should be increased, in order to have
a greater impact at national and European levels. Given the importance
and urgency of this subject, the issue of missing migrant and refugee
children in Europe should be turned into a parliamentary campaign.
56. There are many actions and projects which are helpful for
protecting refugee and migrant children from going missing. Several
stakeholders are contributing through own projects. Most of them
have a specific focus and are not necessarily coordinated at European
level. National parliaments could be instrumental in supporting
such activities and hereby creating synergies and coordination.
57. Legal assistance and cross-border co-operation between relevant
national and regional authorities, including the police, is a key
element of any effective strategy to prevent refugee and migrant
children from going missing. The Council of Europe has a long experience
in facilitating such co-operation in Europe and creating the necessary
foundation for it under international law. As parliamentarians working
under the roof of the Council of Europe, we should use its unique
experience to establish a basis for co-operation on the issue of
missing migrant and refugee children, for whom it is presently not
even possible to determine figures.
58. Practical support for such co-operation is for instance provided
by technical agencies such as Interpol, Europol, Frontex, Red Crescent
and Red Cross as well as by non-governmental organisations. Political guidance
and support by the Assembly may be beneficial in this respect.
59. The tools of Europol, Interpol and Frontex for finding missing
children should be strengthened and their effectiveness increased
by providing financial, technical and personnel support.